REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2020, Vol. 7, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20007
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorPłóciennik, Elżbieta-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-07T09:21:42Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-07T09:21:42Z-
    dc.date.issued2020-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2020, pp. 168-182pl
    dc.identifier.issn2354-0036-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20007-
    dc.description.abstractThe paper presents an analysis of diagnostic and exploratory the author’s studies carried out in various Polish cities, whose main purpose was to identify and analyze specific manifestations of wisdom (with creativity as its strong predictor) in older preschool children. Such research and analysis of collected research material would only be possible using mixed methods. Integration of quantitative and qualitative analyses enabled the analysis of collected research materials to be more in-depth and broader. Likewise, when drawing wider conclusions, the use of this approach allowed to generalize results. Combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis of the research material also allowed to compare research results against a number of studies and concepts supporting child development, especially in cognitive sphere.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectWisdompl
    dc.subjectCreativitypl
    dc.subjectPre-school age childpl
    dc.subjectEducational researchpl
    dc.subjectMixed-methodspl
    dc.titleSearching for Wisdom in Children’s Dialogues: A Mixed Approach in Educational Practicepl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2020 Elżbieta Płóciennik, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2020-0010-
    dc.description.Emailelzbieta.plociennik@uni.lodz.plpl
    dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Łodz, Polandpl
    dc.description.referencesArdelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275-324. doi: 10.1177/0164027503025003004.pl
    dc.description.referencesBaltes, P.B., & Staudyngier, U. (2000). Wisdom: a metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue towards excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122-136. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122 PMid:11392856.pl
    dc.description.referencesBruner, J.S. (1983). Child's talk: learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCraft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education. A lifewide foundation. London - New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.pl
    dc.description.referencesCraft, A., Gardner, H., & Claxton, G. (2008). Creativity, wisdom, and trusteeship. Exploring the role of education. Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Corwin Press, A Sage Company.pl
    dc.description.referencesCreswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Sage Publications Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesCreswell, J.W. (2009), Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Third Ed. Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Sage Publications Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesCropley, A.J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning. A guide for teachers and educators. London, England: Kogan Page.pl
    dc.description.referencesDewey, J. (1993). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.pl
    dc.description.referencesFisher, R. (1998). Thinking about thinking: developing metacognition in children. Journal Early Child Development and Care, 141, 1-15. doi: 10.1080/0300443981410101.pl
    dc.description.referencesFlick, U. (Ed.). (2007). The Sage qualitative research kit. London: Sage Publications Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L., Straßer, I., & Wiedermann, W. (2013). How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00405.pl
    dc.description.referencesGuba, E.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E.G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-27). Newbury Park, C.A.: Sage Publications Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesHall, S. (2010). Wisdom: From Philosophy to Neuroscience. New York: Vintage Books Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesHamilton, S.J. (2005). Development in reflective thinking. Retrieved from https://www. reap.ac.uk/reap/reap07/Portals/2/CSL/keynotes/trudy%20banta/Development_ in_Reflective_Thinking.pdf Accessed 20 June 2016.pl
    dc.description.referencesHowe, K.R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis, or, Dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17, 10-16. doi: 10.3102/0013189X017008010pl
    dc.description.referencesHoutz, J.C. (Ed.). (2003). The educational psychology of creativity. Cresskill, N.Y.: Hampton Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesJohnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004), Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33/7, 14-26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014pl
    dc.description.referencesLee, W.Y., & Wright, S. (2017). Interlocutor-child interactions: Supporting children's creativity in graphic-narrative-embodied play. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42 (3), 73 - 81. doi: 10.23965/ajec.42.3.09pl
    dc.description.referencesMaslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row Publishers Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesMarton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New York: Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesMeacham, J. (1990). The loss of wisdom. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom, its nature, origins, and development (pp.181-211). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesNelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning, and memory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesPaul, R., & Elder, L. (2005). Critical thinking competency standards. Standards, principles, performance indicators, and outcomes with a critical thinking master rubric. A guide for educators. Tomales, C.A.: Foundation for Critical Thinking.pl
    dc.description.referencesPłóciennik, E. (2013). Teaching for wisdom in modern early education. Journal of Preschool and Elementary School Education, 4, 27-48; http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-ea4a1a61-115a-4236-bbe9-b7a3b4c6ec8d? q=bwmeta1.element.desklight-82d07083-1c85-4519-88ea-e32cfaa874c7;1&qt =CHILDREN-STATELESSpl
    dc.description.referencesPłóciennik, E. (2017). Divergent Tasks in the Diagnosis of Wisdom in Older Preschool Children. The New Educational Reviev, 47, 279-291. doi: 10.15804/tner.2017.47.1.22pl
    dc.description.referencesPłóciennik, E. (2018). Children’s creativity as a manifestation and predictor of their wisdom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.009pl
    dc.description.referencesRichardson, J.T.E. (1999). The Concepts and Methods of Phenomenographic Research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 53-82.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A. (2005). Creative giftedness. In R.J. Sternberg, J.E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 295-311). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (Ed.). (1990). Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2005). The WICS Model of Giftedness. In: R.J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 327-340). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2018). Yes, Creativity Can Predict Academic Success! Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 2 (5), 142-14. doi: 10.1515/ctra-2018-0010pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorienko, E.L. (2009). Teaching for wisdom, intelligence, creativity, and success. Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Corwin A SAGE Company.pl
    dc.description.referencesTarricone P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. Hove: Psychology Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesVygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesVygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Massachusetts: MIT Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesWood, D. (2003). How children think and learn. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesWood, D.J., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.14697610.1976.tb00381.x.pl
    dc.description.referencesYin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Sage Publications Inc.pl
    dc.description.volume7pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage168pl
    dc.description.lastpage182pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2020, Vol. 7, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_7_1_2020_E_Plociennik_Searching_for_Wisdom_in_Children’s_Dialogues.pdf334,62 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons