REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20002
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorDobińska, Gabriela-
dc.contributor.authorCieślikowska-Ryczko, Angelika-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-07T07:50:18Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-07T07:50:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2020, pp. 123-146pl
dc.identifier.issn2354-0036-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20002-
dc.description.abstractThe paper focuses on the issues of implementing visual methods in social sciences. The following discussion consists of three fundamental parts. The introduction contains a description of theoretical and methodological dilemmas characteristic of the implementation of visual data, namely primarily photographic material, in social studies. The subsequent part is a characterization of the author’s research strategy, oriented towards organizing the fieldwork of probation officers using the photographic walk method. The strategy was inspired by the tenets of visual grounded theory. In the final part, the authors present selected conclusions associated with the possibilities and limitations of the developed research strategy. Key issues included in the final section of the paper refer to questions connected with plasticity of narration and image, the role of the researcher as creator and interpreter of photographs, and the process of objectification of empirical material. Using the potential of the photographic walk to fulfil the objective, the authors implemented visual and mobile methods. Collected empirical data includes nine transcripts of long conversations, based on an informal disposition card, a set of 1,500 photographs taken during the walks, as well as field notes. The paper presents reflections, dilemmas, difficulties and observations connected with the implementation of the selected strategy, which showed multidimensionality of conducted studies at the stage of development, organization, analysis and construction of theoretical statements.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
dc.subjectVisual methodspl
dc.subjectVisual datapl
dc.subjectPhotographic walkpl
dc.subjectPhotography in social studiespl
dc.titleA Photograph as Material for Analysis and as a Creative Act. Visual Methods in Social Studies - Reflections and Dilemmaspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Gabriela Dobińska, Angelika Cieślikowska-Ryczko, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2020-0008-
dc.description.EmailGabriela Dobińska: gabriela.dobinska@uni.lodz.plpl
dc.description.EmailAngelika Cieślikowska-Ryczko: angelika.cieslikowska@uni.lodz.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationGabriela Dobińska - University of Lodz, Polandpl
dc.description.AffiliationAngelika Cieślikowska-Ryczko - University of Lodz, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesBanks, M. (2013). Materiały wizualne w badaniach jakościowych. [Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.pl
dc.description.referencesBanks, M., Ruby, J. (2011). Made to be seen: Perspectives on the history of visual anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the Standard Interview: The Use of Graphic Elicitation and Arts-Based Methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547-570.pl
dc.description.referencesBaudrillard, J. (2012). Fotografia czyli świetlny zapis. [Photography, or the writing of light]. In: P. Sztompka, M. Bogunia-Borowska (Eds.), Fotospołeczeństwo. Analiza tekstów z socjologii wizualnej. [Photosociety. Analysis of texts from visual sociology] (pp.380-387), Kraków: Znak.pl
dc.description.referencesBecker, H. S. (1974). Photography and Sociology. Visual Communication, 1 (1), 3-26.pl
dc.description.referencesBecker, H. S. (1980). Aesthetics, Aestheticians and Critics. Studies in the Anthropology. Visual Communication, 6, 58-68.pl
dc.description.referencesBecker, H. S. (1982). Culture: A Sociological View. Yale Review, 71, 513-28.pl
dc.description.referencesBecker H. S. (1995). Backup of Visual Sociology, Documentary Photography, and Photojournalism: It's (Almost) All a Matter of Context. Visual Sociology 10(1-2): 5-14.pl
dc.description.referencesBecker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade. How to think about Your research while You are doing it. Chicago, London: The University of Chicacgo Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBourdieu, P. (1990). Structures, habitus, practices, in The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.pl
dc.description.referencesChomczyński, P. (2012). Teoria etykietowania. [Labeling theory]. In: K. Konecki, P. Chomczyński (Eds.) Słownik Socjologii Jakościowej [Qualitative Sociology Dictionary] (pp. 287-291), Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Difin.pl
dc.description.referencesCieślikowska-Ryczko A., & Dobińska, G., (2019). Using the Photographic Walk Technique in the Field Work of Probation Officers. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, [Educational Studies Review], 29, 209-235.pl
dc.description.referencesClarke, A.E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. London: Sage Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesCollier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual Anthropology. Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque: The University of New Mexico Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCrilly, N., Clarkson, J., & Blackwell, A. (2006). Graphic Elicitation: Using Research Diagrams as Interview Stimuli. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 341-366.pl
dc.description.referencesDymarczyk, W. (2008). Czy wielość może znaczyć jakość. O różnorodności socjologii wizualnej. [Can multiplicity mean quality? On the diversity of visual sociology]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], IV/3, 75-89.pl
dc.description.referencesEmmison, M., Smith, P., & Mayall, M. (2012). Researching the visual. London: Sage.pl
dc.description.referencesFerrarotti, F. (1993). Culture and Photography: Reading Sociology through a Lens. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 7/1, 75-95.pl
dc.description.referencesFerenc, T. (2001). Socjologia obrazu, socjologia fotografii - praktyki badawcze. [Sociology of image, sociology of photography - research practices]. Przegląd Socjologiczny, [Sociological Review], 2, 1-25.pl
dc.description.referencesFerenc, T. (2010). O tym jak fotografia stworzyła współczesnego turystę. [About how photography created the modern tourist], 37-47. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.pl
dc.description.referencesFerenc, T., Dymarczyk, W., & Chomczyński, P. (2011). Socjologia wizualna w praktyce: Plakat jako narzędzie propagandy wojennej. [Visual sociology in practice: The poster as a tool of war propaganda]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ.pl
dc.description.referencesFigueroa, S.K. (2008). The Grounded Theory and the Analysis of Audio-Visual Texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(3), 1-12.pl
dc.description.referencesFrąckowiak, M. & Rogowski, Ł. (2009). W poszukiwaniu polskiej socjologii wizualnej. [In search for Polish visual sociology]. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, [Culture and Society], LIII(1), 123-152.pl
dc.description.referencesFrąckowiak, M. (2011). Obrazy w procesach negocjacji światów społecznych. [Images and negotation of the social worlds]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], 7(1), 42-56.pl
dc.description.referencesGalman, S.A. (2009). The truthful messenger: visual methods and representation in qualitative research in education. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 197-217.pl
dc.description.referencesGarner, S. (2008). Writing on drawing: essays on drawing practice and research. Bristol: Intellect.pl
dc.description.referencesGlaser, B., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine: Chicago.pl
dc.description.referencesGlaser, B., & Strauss, A.L. (2009). Odkrywanie teorii ugruntowanej. Strategie badania jakościowego. [Discovery of grounded theory]. Kraków: Nomos.pl
dc.description.referencesGlaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Sociology Press, Mill Valley: CA.pl
dc.description.referencesGoffman, E. (1979). Gender Advertisments. New York: Harper & Row.pl
dc.description.referencesGoffman, E. (2006). Rytuały interakcyjne. [Interaction Ritual]. Warszawa: PWN.pl
dc.description.referencesHarper, D. (1986). Meaning and Work: A Study in Photo Elicitation. Current Sociology, 34, 3, 24-46.pl
dc.description.referencesHarper, D. (1994). On the Authority of the Image. Visual Methods at the Crossroads. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 403-412). London, New Delhi: Thousand Oaks: Sage.pl
dc.description.referencesHolliday, R. (2000). We've been framed: visualising methodology. Sociological Review, 48(4), 503-521.pl
dc.description.referencesJones, P., Bunce, G., Evans, J., Gibbs, M., & Hein, J.R. (2008). Exploring Space and Place With Walking In-terviews. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), 1-9.pl
dc.description.referencesKonecki, K., & Potomska, K. (2002). Archetypy w reklamie. [Archetypes in advertising]. Marketing i Rynek, [Journal of Marketing and Market Studies], 7, 1-15.pl
dc.description.referencesKonecki, K. (2005). Wizualne wyobrażenia: główne strategie badawcze w socjologii wizualnej a metodologia teorii ugruntowanej. [Visual perceptions: major research strategies in visual sociology and the methodology of grounded theory]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], 1(1), 42-63.pl
dc.description.referencesKonecki, K. (2012). Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury. [Visual Grounded Theory. Basic rules and procedures]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [Qualitative Sociology Review], VIII(1), 13-45.pl
dc.description.referencesKunat, B. (2015). Pomiędzy sztuką a badaniem naukowym. Etnografia wizualna jako źródło wiedzy o rzeczywistości edukacyjnej. [Between art and scientific research. Visual ethnography as a source of knowledge about the educational reality]. Pogranicze. Studia Społeczne, [Borderland. social studies], XXVI, 89-101.pl
dc.description.referencesKusenbach, M (2003). Street Phenomenology. The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool. Ethnography, 4, 455-485.pl
dc.description.referencesMagala, S. (2000). Szkoła widzenia czyli świat w subiektywie aparatu fotograficznego. [School of seeing or the world in the subject of a camera]. Wrocław: Biblioteka Formatupl
dc.description.referencesMannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91-111.pl
dc.description.referencesMitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Picture theory. Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMitchell, W.J.T. (2009). Zwrot piktorialny. [Pictorial Turn]. Kultura Popularna, [Popular culture], 1, 31-38.pl
dc.description.referencesNiedźwiedź, A. (2012). Wizualność etnograficzna na podstawie materiałów z archiwum domowego profesora Romana Reinfussa. [Ethnographic Visuality in Materials from Professor Roman Reinfuss’s Private Archive]. Prace Etnograficzne, [Ethnographic Works], 40, 1-10.pl
dc.description.referencesNiziołek, K. (2010). Między amatorstwem a etnografią. Fotografia jako narzędzie edukacji. [Between amateur and ethnography. Photography as an educational tool]. In: A. Młynarczuk & M. Sokołowski (Eds.), Uwiecznić Atlantydę. Wielokulturowość Podlasia w edukacji nieformalnej, [To capture Atlantis. Multiculturalism of Podlasie in informal education] (pp. 23-29). Białystok: Fundacja Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku UNIVERSITAS BIALOSTOCENSIS.pl
dc.description.referencesNóżka, M. & Martini, N. (2015). Metody mobilne i wizualne w praktyce badawczej: zastosowanie fotospaceru w socjologicznych badaniach map mentalnych i zachowań terytorialnych ludzi. [Mobile and Visual Methods in Research Practice. Using PhotoWalks in Sociological Research on Mental Maps and Human Territorial Behaviors]. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, [A review of qualitative sociology], 11(4), 34-50.pl
dc.description.referencesO'Connor, P. (2007). 'Doing boy/girl and global/local elements in 10-12 year olds drawings and written texts. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 229-247.pl
dc.description.referencesOlechnicki, K. (2003). Antropologia obrazu. Fotografia jako metoda, przedmiot i medium nauk społecznych. [Image anthropology. Photography as a method, object and medium of social sciences]. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.pl
dc.description.referencesO’Neill, M. (2014). Participatory Biographies: Walking, Sensing, Belonging. In M. O’Neill, B. Roberts, & A. Sparkes (Eds.), Advancesin Biographical Research: Creative Applications (pp. 73-89). London: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesPiejko, M. (2008). Skarby pamięci. Socjologiczna analiza fotografii rodzinnej. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 4(3), 4-50.pl
dc.description.referencesPink, S. (2007a). Doing Visual Ethnography. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sagepl
dc.description.referencesPink, S. (2007b). Walking With Video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240-252.pl
dc.description.referencesPink, S., (2008). Mobilising Visual Ethnography: Making Routes, Making Place and Making Images. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), 1-17.pl
dc.description.referencesRadley, A., Hodgetts, D., & Cullen, A. (2005). Visualizing homelessness: A study in photography and estrangement. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 15(4), 273-295.pl
dc.description.referencesRipa, C. (1998). Ikonologia. [Iconology]. Kraków: Univesristas.pl
dc.description.referencesRose, G. (2001). Visual Methodologies. An Introduction to the lnteroretations of Visual Materials. London: Sage Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesRose, G. (2010). Interpretacja materiałów wizualnych. Krytyczna metodologia badań nad wizualnością. [An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials]. Warszawa: PWN.pl
dc.description.referencesRose, G. (2014). On the relation between ’visual research methods’ and contemporary visual culture. Sociological Review, 62(1), 24-46.pl
dc.description.referencesSchubert, C. (2006). Video Analysis of Practice and Practice of Video Analysis. Selecting field and focus in videography. In H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, & H. G., Soeffner (Eds.), Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology (pp. 115-127). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.pl
dc.description.referencesSikora, S. (2003). Antropologia wizualna i film etnograficzny. [Visual Anthropology and Ethnographic film]. Warszawa: OPCIT, 3 (10)1, 8-9.pl
dc.description.referencesSikora, S. (2004). Fotografia między dokumentem a symbolem. [A photo between a document and a symbol]. Izabelin: Instytut Sztuki PAN.pl
dc.description.referencesSpencer, S. (2011). Visual Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Awakening Visions. London: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesStrauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesSuchar, C. (1997). Grounding visual research in shooting scripts. Qualitative Sociology, 20(1), 33-55.pl
dc.description.referencesSztandara, M. (2003). O „etnograficzności” fotografii. [On the "ethnographic quality" of photography]. Konteksty. Polska Sztuka Ludowa. Antropologia kultury-etnografia-sztuka, [Contexts. Polish Folk Art. Cultural anthropology-ethnography-art], 3-4, 95-101.pl
dc.description.referencesSztompka, P. (2005). Socjologia wizualna. Fotografia jako metoda badawcza. [Visual sociology. Photography as a research method]. Warszawa: PWN.pl
dc.description.referencesThomson, R., & Holland, J. (2005). Thanks for the memory': memory books as a methodological resource in biographical research. Qualitative Research, 5 (2), 201-219.pl
dc.description.referencesTrell, E.M., & Van Hoven B. (2010). Making Sense of Place: Exploring Creative and (Inter) active Research Methods with Young People. Fennia, 88, 91-104.pl
dc.description.referencesWall, K., Woolner, P., & Hall, E. (2012). Visual methodology: Previously, now and in the future. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(3), 223-226.pl
dc.description.referencesWagner, J. (1979). Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills/London: SAGE Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesWorth, S. (1981). Studying Visual Communication. Philadelphia: Pensylvania Press.pl
dc.description.volume7pl
dc.description.issue1pl
dc.description.firstpage123pl
dc.description.lastpage146pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2020, Vol. 7, Issue 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Creativity_7_1_2020_G_Dobinska_A_Cieslikowska_Ryczko_A_Photograph.pdf798,92 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons