REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/12704
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorIslam, Khandakar Ashraful-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T08:43:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-02T08:43:30Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 34 (3/2021), pp. 16-26pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/12704-
dc.description.abstractBiopolitics—the maneuvers and stratagems employed to regulate, manage and govern people—is one of the most contested theoretical paradigms, which deals with the relation between state politics and human lives. While Foucault links the biopolitical nomos with the oppressive practices which render the human body docile, Giorgio Agamben sheds light on the new biopolitical nomos, which applying the most draconian means, subdue people within the law. According to Agamben, the arbitrary use of such sovereign power not only robs of the constitutional rights of the individuals but also denies their rights to live. Agamben observes that under the new biopolitical nomos each individual is exposed to the threat of being treated as a Homo Sacer, whose life can be taken with impunity. Focusing on Foucault’s concept of biopolitics and applying Agamben’s concepts like “state of exception” and Homo Sacer, the present paper investigates into Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and The Ministry of Utmost Happiness to argue that in present-day India; the enactment of juridico-discursive power (communal riots, lynching, and violence to the lower caste) is not only denying the human rights of the minority groups but also exposing them to a “bare life.”pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Bialystokpl
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/-
dc.subjectBiopoliticspl
dc.subjectHomo Sacerpl
dc.subjectState of exceptionpl
dc.subjectRiotpl
dc.subjectArundhati Roypl
dc.titleBiopolitical Nomos and “bare life” in Arundhati Roy’s novelspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holderAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/CR.2021.34.3.02-
dc.description.Emailashraf.2205@nstu.edu.bdpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteDr. Khandakar Ashraful Islam is an Assistant Professor of English at Noakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh. He has obtained his PhD degree from Osmania University, Hyderabad, India in 2021. His major areas of academic interest comprise postcolonial and cultural studies with a focus on narratives of resistance.pl
dc.description.AffiliationNoakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladeshpl
dc.description.referencesAcocella, Joan. 2017, June 5 & 12. Arundhati Roy returns to fiction, in fury. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/06/05/arundhati-roy-returns-to-fiction-in-fury.pl
dc.description.referencesAgamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. USA: Stanford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBose, B. 2017, July–September. A fearless antinovel. Review Biblio.pl
dc.description.referencesDas, S. 2001. The Nehru years in Indian politics: From a historical hindsight. Edinburgh Papers South Asian Studies 16:1, 2-35.pl
dc.description.referencesFoucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.pl
dc.description.referencesFoucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College De France 1975-76. London: Picador.pl
dc.description.referencesGhosh, J. 2016. Indira Gandhi’s call of emergency and press censorship in India: The ethical parameters revisited. Global Media Journal– Indian Edition 7:2, 1-15.pl
dc.description.referencesGhoshal, S. 2017, June 6. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness by Arundhati Roy: A Far Cry from the Writer’s Brilliant First—The God of Small Things. Huffington Post India. https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/06/01/book-review-the-ministry-of-utmosthappiness- by-arundhati-roy_a_22121017/pl
dc.description.referencesLemke, T. 2005. A zone of indistinction–A critique of Giorgio Agamben’s concept of biopolitics. Outlines: Critical Social Studies 7:1, 3-13.pl
dc.description.referencesManoj, S. 2017. Historicizing fiction: Critiquing contemporary India in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Journal of Literature & Aesthetics 17:1, 111-120.pl
dc.description.referencesMandal, S. 2018. A postcolonial overview of Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Postcolonial English Literature: Theory and Practice. India: Authorpress.pl
dc.description.referencesMichael, H. & Antonio, N. 2000. Empire. United States: Harvard University.pl
dc.description.referencesMinca, C. 2006. Giorgio Agamben and the new biopolitical nomos. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88:4: 387-403, DOI: 10.1111/j.0435- 3684.2006.00229.x.pl
dc.description.referencesMishra, P. 2001, Feb. 11. There’ll always be an England in India. The New York Times Company. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/11/books/there-ll-always-be-an-england-in-india.html.pl
dc.description.referencesNazari, F. & Hossein, P. 2013. Revisiting colonial legacy in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Journal of Educational and Social Research 3:1, 199-210, DOI: 10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p199.pl
dc.description.referencesParfitt, T. 2009. Are the third world poor Homines Sacri? Biopolitics, sovereignty, and development. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 34:1, 41–58.pl
dc.description.referencesPassos, V. 2003. Micro-Universes and Situated Critical Theory: Postcolonial and Feminist Dialogues in a Comparative Study of Indo-English and Lusophone Women Writers. Diss. Utrecht.pl
dc.description.referencesRabinow, P. & Nikolas, R. 2006. Biopower today. Biosocieties 1:2, 195-217.pl
dc.description.referencesRam, K. 2017. Entropic fiction and its narrative strategy: A perspective on The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Journal of Literature & Aesthetics, 17:1, 91-99.pl
dc.description.referencesRoy, A. 1997. The God of Small Things. India: IndiaInk.pl
dc.description.referencesRoy, A. 2002, January 31. Shall we leave it to the experts. The Nation, https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/shall-we-leave-it-experts/pl
dc.description.referencesRoy, A. 2002, April 28. Democracy: Who is she when she’s at home? Outlook (India), http://www.sacw.net/Gujarat2002/arundhatiroyAug2002.htmlpl
dc.description.referencesRoy, A. 2010, September 11. Trickledown revolution, Dawn, https://www.dawn.com/news/562271/the-trickledown-revolution-2pl
dc.description.referencesRoy, A. 2017. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. India: Penguin Random House.pl
dc.description.referencesSahadevan, P. 2013. Managing Internal Conflicts in India, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Myanmar: Strategies and Outcomes. Policy Choices in Internal Conflicts: Governing Systems and Outcomes. New Delhi.pl
dc.description.referencesSumrain, M. & Shadi N. 2016. Postcolonial places as reconstructs of colonial culture: A reading of Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities 12:1, 58-70.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue34 (3/2021)pl
dc.description.firstpage16pl
dc.description.lastpage26pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0176-4518-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2021, Issue 34

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Crossroads_34_2021_KA_Islam_Biopolitical_Nomos_and_bare_life_in_Arundhati_Roys_novels.pdf417,94 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons