REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies
  4. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2019, Issue 27

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/8885
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorAwier, Martyna-
    dc.date.accessioned2020-03-09T10:31:00Z-
    dc.date.available2020-03-09T10:31:00Z-
    dc.date.issued2019-
    dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 27 (4/2019), pp. 4-21pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/8885-
    dc.description.abstractPoliticians recruit conceptual metaphors, as these means enable them to talk about abstract political problems in terms of more tangible and commonplace entities. This study aims to explore linguistic aspects of Trump’s presidential campaign and is conducted in light of premises derived from Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Metaphor Theory. The selected speeches were analyzed using a corpus research tool, i.e. Metaphor Identification Process was implemented. Donald Trump’s campaign speeches were retrieved from internet sources. The period from January 24th, 2015 to October 20th, 2016 was chosen for compiling the primary corpus of 20 speeches. The qualitative analysis indicates that the President used metaphorical expressions frequently. The author of the article enumerates some grand metaphorical themes underlying Donald Trump’s campaign speeches.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherThe University of Bialystokpl
    dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0*
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
    dc.subjectDonald Trumppl
    dc.subjectcampaign speechespl
    dc.subjectconceptual metaphorpl
    dc.subjectMIPpl
    dc.subjectdiscoursepl
    dc.titleDonald Trump’s political campaign rhetoric. A cognitive studypl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.15290/cr.2019.27.4.01-
    dc.description.BiographicalnoteMartyna Awier is a PhD student at the University of Białystok, Poland. Her academic interests are in the areas of cognitive linguistics and discourse studies. Her current research focuses on conceptual metaphors and Critical Discourse Analysis.pl
    dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.description.referencesBarczewska, S. 2017. Conceptualizing Evolution Education. A Corpus-Based Analysis of US Press Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeard, A. 2000. The Language of Politics. London: Routledge.pl
    dc.description.referencesBloch, M. (ed.). 1975. Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society. London/New York/San Francisco: Academic Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCameron, L. 2010. The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In: L. Cameron & R. Maslen (eds.), Metaphor Analysis. Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities, 77-98. London, Oakville: Equinox.pl
    dc.description.referencesCap, P. 2008. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17-41.pl
    dc.description.referencesCharteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approach to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.pl
    dc.description.referencesCharteris-Black, J. 2005. Corpus Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.pl
    dc.description.referencesChilton, P. & Lakoff, G. 1989. Foreign policy by metaphors. Center for Research in Language 3/5: 2-19.pl
    dc.description.referencesCienki, A. 2005. Metaphor in the ‘Strict Father’ and ‘Nurturant Parent’ cognitive models: Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics 16: 279-312.pl
    dc.description.referencesDeignan, A. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.pl
    dc.description.referencesFabiszak, M. 2010. Vilification of the enemy: Different enemies, the same linguistic strategies. In: D. Stanulewicz, T. Wolański & J. Redzimska (eds.), Lingua Terra Cognita II: A Festschrift for Professor Roman Kalisz, 73-97. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.pl
    dc.description.referencesFabiszak, M. & Konat, B. 2013. Zastosowanie korpusów językowych w językoznawstwie kognitywnym. In: P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Metodologie językoznawstwa. Ewolucja języka. Ewolucja teorii językoznawczych, 131-142. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.pl
    dc.description.referencesGibbs, R. W. 2017. Metaphor Wars. Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesGórska, E. 2008. Four arguments for patterns of metaphorical thought. Acta Philologica 35: 15-31.pl
    dc.description.referencesGórska, E. 2014. Dynamiczne podejście do metafory. Prace Filologiczne LXIV/2: 109-122.pl
    dc.description.referencesGrey, W. 2000. Metaphor and meaning. Minerva 4: 1-8.pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. 2002. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate – The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. 2006. Thinking Points: Communicating Our American Values and Vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. 2008. The neural theory of metaphor. In: R. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor, 17-38. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. 2016a. How to help Trump. http://georgelakoff.com/2016/12/15/how-to-helptrump/ (2 May 2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. 2016b. Understanding Trump’s use of language. http://georgelakoff.com/2016/08/19/understanding-trumps-use-of-language/ (2 May 2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. 2017. The president is the nation: The central metaphor Trump lives By. http://georgelakoff.com/2017/08/01/the-president-is-the-nation-the-central-metaphor-trump-lives-by/ (2 May 2019).pl
    dc.description.referencesLakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesPragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22/1: 1-39.pl
    dc.description.referencesTurner, M. 1994. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesVan Dijk, T. A. 1997. What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11: 11-52.pl
    dc.description.referencesWodak, R. 2009. Language and politics. In: J. Culpeper, F. Katamba, P. Kerswill, R. Wodak & T. McEnery (eds.), English Language: Description, Variation and Context. A definitive new textbook in English language, 577-592. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
    dc.description.issue27 (4/2019)-
    dc.description.firstpage4pl
    dc.description.lastpage21pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5371-8871-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (SzkDokt)
    Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2019, Issue 27

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Crossroads_27_2019_M_Awier_Donald_Trump’s_political_campaign_rhetoric.pdf255,35 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons