Perfekcjonizująca rola prawa w teorii Roberta P. George’a

Pole DC	Wartość	Język
dc.contributor.author	Czarnecka, Agata	-
dc.date.accessioned	2018-09-06T08:02:39Z	-
dc.date.available	2018-09-06T08:02:39Z	-
dc.date.issued	2017	-
dc.identifier.citation	Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica T. 16, Z. 2, 2017, s. 55-67	pl
dc.identifier.issn	1732-9132	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6874	-
dc.description.abstract	I start this article by introducing the new natural theory and its best-known authors. I reconstruct their conception of law and I focus on Robert P. George and his specific conception of law and its role. According to George, there is no law without morality and law should always promote a certain conception of good life. It is through the law that a state imposes some moral values on its citizens. Therefore, among other functions of the legal system there is a perfectionist one. I also stress that George tries to promote such model through his own life and academic career by making his own public philosophy.	pl
dc.description.sponsorship	Autorka uzyskała środki finansowe na przygotowanie rozprawy doktorskiej z Narodowego Centrum Nauki w ramach finansowania stypendium doktorskiego na podstawie decyzji numer DEC-2013/08/T/HS5/00489.	pl
dc.language.iso	pl	pl
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku	pl
dc.subject	perfectionism	pl
dc.subject	new natural law theory	pl
dc.subject	Robert P. George	pl
dc.subject	perfekcjonizm prawa	pl
dc.subject	nowa teoria prawa naturalnego	pl
dc.title	Perfekcjonizująca rola prawa w teorii Roberta P. George’a	pl
dc.title.alternative	Robert P. George’s Perfectionist Conception of Law	pl
dc.type	Article	pl
dc.identifier.doi	10.15290/mhi.2017.16.02.04	-
dc.description.Email	agatato@umk.pl	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu	pl
dc.description.references	Bradley Gerard V., The Moral Bases for Legal Regulation of Pornography, [w:] The Social Costs of Pornography. A Collection of Papers, red. J.R. Stoner Jr., D. M. Hughes, Princeton 2010.	pl
dc.description.references	Ceaser James W., What is Public Philosophy, [w:] Public Philosophy and Political Science. Crisis and Reflection, red. E. Robert Statham Jr., Oxford 2002.	pl
dc.description.references	Dworkin Gerald, Devlin Was Right: Law and the Enforcement of Morality, „William and Mary Law Review” 1999, t. 40, nr 3.	pl
dc.description.references	Finnis John, Natural Theory and Limited Government, [w:] Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality, red. R.P. George, Oxford 2002.	pl
dc.description.references	Finnis John, Prawo naturalne i uprawnienia naturalne, Warszawa 2000.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., Gerard V. Bradley, Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council, Inc. and Focus on the Family in Support of the Respondent, 2003.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., Making Children Moral: Pornography, Parents, and the Public Interest, [w:] idem, The Clash of Orthodoxies. Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis, Wilmington 2001.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., Making Men Moral. Civil Liberties and Public Morality, Oxford 2002.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., Natural Law and Positive Law, [w:] The Autonomy of Law. Essays on Legal Positivism, red. R. P. George, Oxford 2005.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., Natural Law, „American Journal of Jurisprudence” 2007, t. 52.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., Natural Law, „Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy” 2008, t. 31, nr 1.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., Natural Law, God, and Human Dignity, [w:] idem, Conscience and Its Enemies, Wilmington 2013.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert P., The Concept of Public Morality, [w:] idem, The Clash of Orthodoxies. Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis, Wilmington 2001.	pl
dc.description.references	George Robert, Sherif Girgis, Ryan Anderson, Amici Curiae Brief of Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal, 2013.	pl
dc.description.references	Grisez Germain, The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the „Summa Theologiae”, 1–2, q. 94 a. 2, “Natural Law Forum” 1965, t. 10.	pl
dc.description.references	Grisez Germain. Joseph Boyle, John Finnis, Practical Principles, Moral, and Ultimate Ends, “The American Journal of Jurisprudence” 1987, nr 32.	pl
dc.description.references	Lippman Walter, Essays in Public Philosophy, 1955.	pl
dc.description.references	Miętek Agata, Miejsce Johna Mitchella Finnisa we współczesnej teorii prawa, „Dialogi Polityczne” 2007, nr 8.	pl
dc.description.references	Miętek Agata, Nowa teoria prawa naturalnego. Główne konteksty i problemy, „Dialogi Polityczne” 2008, nr 9.	pl
dc.description.references	Paul van Seters, From Public Sociology to Public Philosophy: Lessons for Law and Society, “Law & Social Inquiry” 2010, t. 35, nr 4.	pl
dc.description.references	Pigliucci Massimo, Leonard Finkelman, The Value of Public Philosophy to Philosophers, “Essays in Philosophy” 2014, t. 15, nr 1.	pl
dc.description.references	Reiman Jeffrey, John Rawls’s New Conception of the Problem of Limited Government: Reply to Michael Zuckert, [w:] Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality, red. R. P. George, Oxford 2002.	pl
dc.description.references	Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S.620 (1996).	pl
dc.description.references	Sandel Michael, Public Philosophy. Essays on Morality in Politics, Cambridge – London 2005.	pl
dc.description.references	Sandel Michael, Democracy’s Discontent. America in Search of Public Philosophy, Cambridge– London 1996.	pl
dc.description.references	Selznick Philip, A Humanist Science. Values and Ideals in Social Inquiry, Stanford 2008.	pl
dc.description.references	Tinur´e Maris K¨opcke, Finnis on legal and Moral Obligation, [w:] Reason, Morality, and Law. The Philosophy of John Finnis, red. J. Keown, R. P. George, Oxford 2013.	pl
dc.description.references	Tollefsen Christopher, Pure Perfectionism and the Limits of Paternalism, [w:] Reason, Morality, and Law, red. R. P. George, J. Keown, Oxford 2013.	pl
dc.description.references	Tully James, Public Philosophy in a New Key, t. 1, Cambridge 2008.	pl
dc.description.references	Weinstein Jack R., What Does Public Philosophy Do? (Hint: It Does Not Make Better Citizens), “Essays in Philosophy” 2014, t. 15, nr 1.	pl
dc.description.references	Zuckert Michael P., Is Modern Liberalism Compatible with Limited Government? The Case of Rawls, [w:] Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality, red. R. P. George, Oxford 2002.	pl
dc.description.volume	16	-
dc.description.firstpage	55	pl
dc.description.lastpage	67	pl
dc.identifier.citation2	Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica	pl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):	Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 2017, tom XVI, Z. 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:

Plik	Opis	Rozmiar	Format
MHI_16_2_2017_A_Czarnecka_Perfekcjonizujaca_rola_prawa_w _teorii_Roberta_ P_Georg'a.pdf		147,62 kB	Adobe PDF	Otwórz

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki