REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6320
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorCudowska, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-16T11:46:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-16T11:46:51Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, Vol. 22 nr 3, 2017, s. 133-143pl
dc.identifier.issn1689–7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/6320-
dc.description.abstractIn an era of shaky familial relations, child custody and the principles of the best interest of the child have emerged with more strength and fortified protections than ever before. With the growing divorce rates, children remain the most vulnerable parties, thereby making them prone to some of the more damaging consequences of family dissolution. When analyzing child custody/protection laws around the globe, there are clear differences as to the enactment and enforcement of certain protections for children. This paper will explore the differences and similarities between Poland and the United States’ (specifically, Minnesota) best interest factors. Additionally, this paper will aim to find a common ground between the common law and civil law regulations in place in both Minnesota and Poland.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherTemida 2pl
dc.subjectchild custodypl
dc.subjectbest interest factorspl
dc.subjectfamily lawpl
dc.subjectdomestic violencepl
dc.subjectopieka nad dzieckiempl
dc.subjectzasada nadrzędnego dobrapl
dc.subjectochrona dzieckapl
dc.subjectprzemoc domowapl
dc.titleChild Custody in Minnesota and in Poland. The Best Interest Factors – A Comparative Overviewpl
dc.title.alternativeSprawowanie opieki nad dzieckiem w stanie Minesota i w Polsce. Koncepcja “nadrzędnego interesu dziecka” – analiza porównawczapl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2017.22.03.12-
dc.description.Emailmcudowska@wp.plpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteMaria Cudowska – doktorantka w Zakładzie Prawa Handlowego, Katedra Prawa Cywilnego Wydziału Prawa Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.pl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteMaria Cudowska – PhD Candidate at the Institute of Commercial Law, Department of Civil Law, Faculty of Law, University of Bialystok.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniwersytet w Białymstokupl
dc.description.referencesAbrams D.E., Cahn N.R., Ross C.J., Meyer D.D., Contemporary Family Law, Hardcover 2009.pl
dc.description.referencesApplication no. 78296/11 Karolina NADOLSKA and Bronek LOPEZ NADOLSKA against Poland.pl
dc.description.referencesBailey A.M., Prioritizin Child Safety as the Prime Best – Interest Factor, “FamLQ” vol. 47.pl
dc.description.referencesBlair D.M., Weiner M.H., Resolving Parental Custody Disputes – A Comparative Exploration, “Family L.Q.” 2005, vol. 39.pl
dc.description.referencesBoulette M.P., A Practioner’s Guide To Minnesota’s New Best Interest Factors, 9 Wm. Mitchell J. L. & Prac.pl
dc.description.referencesGaskill v. Gaskill, 936 S.W.2d 626 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).pl
dc.description.referencesHague Conference on Private International Law, Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, 29 May 1993.pl
dc.description.referencesHains v. Hains, 36 So. 3d 289, (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010).pl
dc.description.referencesMączyński A., Mączyńska J., National Rerport: Poland, available at: http://cefl online.net/wp-content/uploads/Poland-Parental-Responsibilities.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesMINN. STAT. § 518.17, (2016).pl
dc.description.referencesRaleigh v. Watkins, 97 Mich. App. 258, 293 N.W.2d 789 (1980).pl
dc.description.referencesRexine v. Rexine 2015 WL 6442560 (Min. Ct. Appeals 2016).pl
dc.description.referencesStojanowska W., Dobro dziecka w aspekcie sprawowanej nad nim władzy rodzicielskiej, “Studia nad Rodziną” 2000, 4 no 1(6).pl
dc.description.referencesUN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577.pl
dc.description.referencesUniform Marriage and Divorce Act, 9A U.L.A. 91 (1979).pl
dc.description.volume22-
dc.description.number3-
dc.description.firstpage133pl
dc.description.lastpage143pl
dc.identifier.citation2Białostockie Studia Prawniczepl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2017, Vol. 22 nr 3

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_22_3_M_Cudowska_Child_Custody_in_Minnesota_and_Poland.pdf4,15 MBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)