REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6257
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorDaszkiewicz, Michał-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T11:30:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T11:30:31Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCrossroads. A Journal of English Studies 16 (1/2017), pp. 4-18pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/6257-
dc.description.abstractThe paper reports on a study with over 600 respondents (EFL students) from 18 countries, concerning their personal approach to mastering two selected topics (Clothes and Sport). The hypotheses and the major conclusions relate to four facets – structure, lexis, correctness, fluency – which are presented in the paper as components to which L2 students need to be positively oriented to fully master any given topic. The study reveals structural orientation (within and across topics) to be approached least positively and, contrary to initial expectations – correct use of language being as much desired as the mastery of lexis and attainment of fluency. Most crucial empirical observations concern intercultural differences detected on the topical level, discrepancies between declared practices and indecisiveness in learning, and resignation from learning habits boosting control over the language learnt. The study is grounded in the concept of ‘composing one’s own English’ as a personalised approach conducive to what is referred in the paper as formal control over it.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherThe University of Bialystokpl
dc.subjectComposing Your Own Englishpl
dc.subjectattitude to L2pl
dc.subjectpersonalised learningpl
dc.subjectlanguage mastery/masterpiecepl
dc.subjectintercultural differencespl
dc.titleDo English learners from different countries approach (“compose”) topics differently? A study reportpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/cr.2017.16.1.01-
dc.description.Emailpedmd@univ.gda.plpl
dc.description.BiographicalnoteMichał Daszkiewicz holds a PhD in applied linguistics and teaches at the Institute of Education at the University of Gdańsk. He is the initiator and coordinator of the international Educational Role of Language Network, the chief aim of which is to bridge the gap between educational and linguistic studies. His recent publications address this interdisciplinary blend and issues such as personal experiencing of language, second language oracy, relation between L2 reception and production, and, more broadly, educational linguistics. Currently, he is working on the relationship between general education and language skills, particularly the productive ones.pl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Gdańskpl
dc.description.referencesAnnoussamy, D. 2006. Psychological aspects of language acquisition. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology Vol. 32, No.2. 84-92pl
dc.description.referencesArnold, J. and H.D. Brown. 1999. A map of the terrain. In: J. Arnold (ed.), Affect in Language Learning, 1-24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presspl
dc.description.referencesArnold, J. 2011. Attention to affect in language learning. Anglistik. International Journal of English Studies 22/1. 11-22pl
dc.description.referencesBarcelos, A.M.F. 2015. Unveiling the relationship between language learning belief, emotions and identity. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 5(2). 301-325pl
dc.description.referencesBates, E., A. Devescovi, and B. Wulfeck. 2001. Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52. 369-396.pl
dc.description.referencesBrutt-Griffler, J. 2012. World English. A Study of its Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matterspl
dc.description.referencesCameron, L. 2001. Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presspl
dc.description.referencesDaszkiewicz, M. 2017. Compose your own English. Theoretical foundations and practical aspects of a personalized speaking-oriented EFL approach. Filologičeskie Nauki. Naučnye Doklady Vysšej Školy 2. 37-50pl
dc.description.referencesDewaele, J-M. 2015. On emotions in foreign language learning and use. JALT 2015 conference article online. The Language Teacher 39.3, JALT Publications. 13-15pl
dc.description.referencesDörnyei, Z., and K. Csizér. 2012. How to design and analyze surveys in SLA research? In: A. Mackey & S. Gass Malden (eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide, 74-94. MA: Wiley-Blackwellpl
dc.description.referencesDuranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presspl
dc.description.referencesEvans, R. and D. Jones 2009. Perspectives on oracy – towards a theory of practice. In: R. Evans & D. Jones (eds.), Metacognitive Approaches to Developing Oracy. Developing Speaking and Listening with Young Children, vii-xvii. Rochester: Routledge, Taylor & Francispl
dc.description.referencesGarrett, P.B. 2004. Language contact and contact languages. In: A. Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, 46-72. Malden: Blackwell Publishingpl
dc.description.referencesHenry, A., S. Davydenko, and Z. Dörnyei, 2015. The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of l2 motivation. Modern Language Journal 99(2). 329-345.pl
dc.description.referencesLantolf, J.P. 2011. The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. In: D. Atkinson (ed.), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, 24-47. London: Routledgepl
dc.description.referencesLinn, A., N. Bermel, and G. Ferguson (eds.) 2015. Attitudes towards English in Europe. English in Europe Vol. 1, Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, Incpl
dc.description.referencesMacGowan-Gilhooly, A. 1991. Fluency first: reversing the traditional ESL sequence. Journal of Basic Writing Vol. 10, No. 1. 73-87.pl
dc.description.referencesMcKinney, C. and B. Norton B. 2008. Identity in language and literacy education. In: B. Spolsky & F.M. Hult (eds.), The Handbook of Educational Linguistics, 192-215. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltdpl
dc.description.referencesMcKullen, E. and J.R. Saffran. 2004. Music and language: A developmental comparison. Music Perception Vol. 21, No.3. 289-311.pl
dc.description.referencesMota, M.B. 2010. Interlanguage development and L2 speech production: How do they relate? In: L. Scliar-Cabral (ed.), Psycholinguistics. Scientific and technological challenges, 220-227. Porto Alegre: Leonor Scliar-Cabralpl
dc.description.referencesNiemierko B. 1999. Pomiar wyników kształcenia [‘Measurement of educational outcomes’]. Warszawa: WSiP.pl
dc.description.referencesWenzel, R. 2015. Language education and teaching by the learner’s text creation. In: K. Janczukowicz & M. Rychło (eds.), General Education and Language Teaching Methodology. The Gdańsk School of ELT, 113-114. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Langpl
dc.identifier.eissn2300-6250-
dc.description.issue16 (1/2017)-
dc.description.firstpage4pl
dc.description.lastpage18pl
dc.identifier.citation2Crossroads. A Journal of English Studiespl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2017, Issue 16

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Crossroads_16_2017_M_Daszkiewicz_Do_English_learners_from_different_countries_approach.pdf224,4 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)