Sensitivity to extralinguistic cues to identify generic and non-generic meaning

Pole DC	Wartość	Język
dc.contributor.author	Karczewski, Daniel	-
dc.contributor.author	Buivolova, Olga	-
dc.date.accessioned	2017-03-20T12:00:10Z	-
dc.date.available	2017-03-20T12:00:10Z	-
dc.date.issued	2015	-
dc.identifier.citation	Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies 10 (3/2015), pp. 4-14	pl
dc.identifier.issn	2300-6250	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11320/5295	-
dc.description	The authors are thankful to Anna Bakłażec who designed pictorial stimuli for the study.	pl
dc.description.abstract	Generic sentences convey generalizations about kinds. In contrast, non-generics express facts about specific individuals or groups of individuals. However, to identify generic meaning, we have to integrate multiple cues. This study tested whether the discrepancy between the noun phrase and the number of objects (extralinguistic cues) present should force a generic interpretation whereas the match between the noun phrase and the number of objects present would give rise to a non-generic interpretation. Results demonstrated that adults are sensitive to the match and the mismatch situations in three out of four conditions tested. The data also indicate the importance of world knowledge cues in construing sentences as generic.	pl
dc.description.sponsorship	The study was supported by the Erasmus Mundus Action 2 project Aurora II (2013-2521) grant to Karczewski.	pl
dc.language.iso	en	pl
dc.publisher	The University of Bialystok	pl
dc.subject	generics	pl
dc.subject	non-generics	pl
dc.subject	extralinguistic cues	pl
dc.subject	adults	pl
dc.subject	Russian	pl
dc.title	Sensitivity to extralinguistic cues to identify generic and non-generic meaning	pl
dc.type	Article	pl
dc.identifier.doi	10.15290/cr.2015.10.3.01	-
dc.description.Email	Daniel Karczewski: daniel.karczewski@gmail.com	pl
dc.description.Email	Olga Buivolova: ovbuyvolova@edu.hse.ru	pl
dc.description.Biographicalnote	Daniel Karczewski holds a PhD in linguistics, and works in the Institute of Modern Languages at the University of Białystok. His research interests include: cognitive linguistics and psycholinguistics. He has recently published a book Generyczność w języku i w myśleniu. Studium kognitywne (Genericity in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Study).	pl
dc.description.Biographicalnote	Olga Buivolova is an MA student in linguistic theory at the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia. Her main research interests are neurolinguistics and neuropsychology.	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	Daniel Karczewski - University of Białystok, Poland	pl
dc.description.Affiliation	Olga Buivolova - National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia	pl
dc.description.references	Akhutina, T. 2015. Luria’s classification of aphasias and its theoretical basis. Aphasiology, 30, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1070950	pl
dc.description.references	Alda, M., Beyssade, C., and Del Prete, F. (eds.) 2012. Genericity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Brandone, A.C., and Gelman, S.A. 2009. Differences in preschoolers’ and adults’ use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: A window onto a conceptual divide. Cognition, 110(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.005	pl
dc.description.references	Carlson, Gregory N. 1980. Reference to Kinds in English. New York: Garland.	pl
dc.description.references	Cimpian, A., Meltzer, T. J. and Markman, E. M. 2011. Preschoolers’ use of morphosyntactic cues to identify generic sentences: Indefinite singular noun phrases, tense, and aspect. Child Development, 82, 1561–1578. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01615.x	pl
dc.description.references	Cimpian, A., and Markman, E. M. 2008. Preschool children’s use of cues to generic meaning. Cognition, 107, 19–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.008	pl
dc.description.references	Dąbrowska, E. 2012. “Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment”. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2:3, 219-253. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab	pl
dc.description.references	Dayal, Veneeta. 2011. “Bare Noun Phrases”. In C. Maeinborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 33.2, 1087-1108.	pl
dc.description.references	Dragoy, O., Bergelson, M., Iskra, E., Laurinavichyute, A., Mannova, E., Skvortsov, A., and Statnikov, A. 2015. Comprehension of reversible constructions in semantic aphasia. Aphasiology, 30, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1063582	pl
dc.description.references	Ermolenko, S. S. 1987. Образные средства морфологии. Киев: Наукова думка.	pl
dc.description.references	Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child. Oxford: Oxford University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Gelman, S. A. and Raman, L. 2003. Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics. Child Development, 74, 308–325. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00537	pl
dc.description.references	Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K., Hartman, E., and Pappas, A. 1998. “Beyond labeling: The role of parental input in the acquisition of richly structured categories”. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 235, Vol. 63, No.1.	pl
dc.description.references	Golovan, E. A. 2013. “Переносное значение формы единственного числа имен существительных и их нереферентное употребление”. In Akhmetova, M.N., Ivanova, U.V., Laktionov, K.S., Komogortsev, M.G., Akhmetova, V.V., Brezgin, V.S., Kotlyarov, A.V., and Yakhina, A.S. (eds.), Современная филология: материалы II международной научной конференции (Уфа, январь 2013 г.). Уфа: Лето, 62–64.	pl
dc.description.references	Jespersen, O. 2002. Философия грамматики. Москва: Едиториал УРСС.	pl
dc.description.references	Karczewski, D. 2016. Generyczność w języku i w myśleniu. Studium kognitywne. Kraków: Universitas.	pl
dc.description.references	Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., ter Meulen, A., Link, G., and Chierchia G. 1995. “Genericity: An Introduction”. In G. N. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–124.	pl
dc.description.references	Leslie, S.-J. 2007. Generics and the structure of the mind. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 375–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00138.x	pl
dc.description.references	Leshkova, O. O. 1984. “К вопросу о функционально-семантической категории собирательности в русском и польском языках”. Советское славяноведение 5, 92–101.	pl
dc.description.references	Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.	pl
dc.description.references	Pappas, A., and Gelman S. A. 1998. “Generic noun phrases in mother-child conversations”. Journal of Child Language 25, 19-33. doi: 10.1017/S0305000997003292	pl
dc.description.references	Peirce, J. W. 2009. Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2(10), 1–8. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008	pl
dc.description.references	Shelyakin, M. A. 1985. “О функциональной модели форм числа существительных в русском языке”. In Ученые записки Тартуского государственного университета №719: Функциональные аспекты грамматики русского языка. Тарту: Издательство Тартуского университета, 3–22.	pl
dc.description.pages	4-14	pl
dc.description.issue	10 (3/2015)	-
dc.description.firstpage	4	-
dc.description.lastpage	14	-
dc.identifier.citation2	Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies	pl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):	Artykuły naukowe (WFil) Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 2015, Issue 10

Pliki w tej pozycji:

Plik	Opis	Rozmiar	Format
Crossroads_10_2015_D.Karczewski_O.Buivolova_Sensitivity_to_extralinguistic_cues_to_identify_generic_and_non-generic_meaning.pdf		278 kB	Adobe PDF	Otwórz

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki