REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/4584
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorDubicki, Andrzej-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-26T09:50:41Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-26T09:50:41Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, z. 20/B, 2016, s. 259-272pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/4584-
dc.description.abstractIn the Romanian political system the presidential office appeared for the first time in the year 1974, when Nicolae Ceauşescu finally consolidated his power and then created the uninominal office of the head of state. His power was very widely denominated to underline his real position – the leader of the party and of course of the state. After the Romanian revolution from December 1989, which ousted him and part of the communist party from power, the presidential office was maintained, but of course, only after necessary changes arising from the adoption of democratic principles had been implemented. After proclamation of the stable constitution from 1993, presidential powers were officially diminished but in reality the president still had the final word, e.g. during the process of creating the government. Until the amendment of the constitution in 2003, the president was undoubtedly considered as leader of the state, this resulting from the commonpresidential and parliamentary elections which were polled simultaneously. Due to the fact that the electoral campaign was common, it was almost natural that the president should be considered the stronger person in comparison to the prime minister. Also they were always from the same party. The aforementioned amendment of the constitution changed the situation. From 2004 the elections were held separately, thus leading to cohabitation between the president and the prime minister. This occurence led to the development of a cold war between thepolitical factions involved, who usually held entirely different views on relations of state. This became especially visible in 2009 and again between 2012 and 2015, even on two occasions leading, albeit unsuccessfully, to attempts at impeachment. Presently this conflict is at stalemate following the serious political crisis of November 2015. Romanian politics now awaits the local and parliamentary elections to be held in 2016.pl
dc.language.isoplpl
dc.publisherTemida 2pl
dc.subjectRomaniapl
dc.subjectpresidencypl
dc.subjectpolitical systempl
dc.subjectRumuniapl
dc.subjectprezydentpl
dc.subjectsystem politycznypl
dc.titleEwolucja polityczna prezydentury w Rumuniipl
dc.title.alternativePolitical evolution of the Romanian presidencypl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2016.20B.17-
dc.description.AffiliationUniwersytet Łódzkipl
dc.description.referencesW. Brodziński. 2009, Ustrój konstytucyjny Rumunii po „rewolucji” z grudnia 1989 roku, [w:] Dwie dekady zmian. Rumunia 1989-2009, Warszawa: Difin.pl
dc.description.referencesA. Burakowski. 2008, Geniusz Karpat. Dyktatura Nicolae Ceauşescu 1965-1989, Warszawa: Trio.pl
dc.description.referencesA. Burakowski. 2014, System polityczny współczesnej Rumunii, Warszawa-Kraków: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN; Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej.pl
dc.description.referencesA. Burakowski, M. Stan. 2012, Kraj smutny pełen humoru. Dzieje Rumunii po 1989 roku, Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN; Trio.pl
dc.description.referencesR. Carp. 2005, “Rule of law vs. Presidential Power: the case of exculpation decrees”, Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review, (1) 2005: 131-141.pl
dc.description.referencesD. Cătănuş. 2011,” Întărirea centralismului absolut şi tetania puterii absolute, 1987”, Arhivele totalitarismului, (1-2) 2011: 215-222.pl
dc.description.referencesS. Demian. 2008, “Romania. A blow for Băsescu”, Transitions Online, 07/01/2008: 1-4.pl
dc.description.referencesD. Dragoman. 2014, “Schimbăm (doar) ca să câştigăm? Huliganismul politic şi schimbarea regulilor electorale în România”, Polis. Revista de Știinţe Politice, (4) 2014: 87-105.pl
dc.description.referencesCr. Ghinea. 2003, “Noua Constituţie prelungeşte lupta dintre palate”, Dilema, 511/2003: 1.pl
dc.description.referencesM. Kubát, M. Brunclík. 2014, “Parlamentarismus nebo poloprezidencialismus? Spor o klasifikaci středoevropských demokratických režimú”, Central European Political Studies Reviev, (2-3) 2014: 120-122.pl
dc.description.referencesKonstytucja Rumunii z 21 listopada 1991, [tłum.] A. Cosma, [wstęp] W. Brodziński, Warszawa 1996.pl
dc.description.referencesKonstytucja Socjalistycznej Republiki Rumunii, [tłum:] S. Gebethner, [wstęp] W. Sokolewicz, J. Zakrzewska, Wrocław – Warszawa 1978.pl
dc.description.referencesC.G. Marian, R.F. King. 2010, Plus ça change: Electoral law reform and the 2008 Romanian parliamentary elections”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, (43) 2010: 7-18.pl
dc.description.referencesM. Neemes, Ion Iliescu. 2002, “The Political leadership style”, Studia Universitatis Babes Bolyai Politica, (1) 2002: 37-50.pl
dc.description.referencesG. Sartori. 2008, Ingineria constituţionala comparata, Bucureşti: Polirom.pl
dc.description.referencesG. Sartori. 2011, Srovnávací ústavní ínženýrství, Praha: Slon.pl
dc.description.referencesJ. Šedo, P. Bršťáková. 2009, “Pozice rumunského prezidenta v ústavě a v praxi po roce 1989”, Politologická revue, (2) 2009: 23-47.pl
dc.description.referencesH.A. Welsh. 1994, “Political Transition Processes in Central and Eastern Europe”, Comparative Politics, (26), 4 (1994): 379-394.pl
dc.description.pages259-272pl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2016, Z. 20/B

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_20B_Dubicki.pdf335,87 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)