REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/4458
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorFlorkowski, Wojciech J.-
dc.contributor.authorŁysiak, Grzegorz P.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-31T08:52:03Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-31T08:52:03Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationOptimum. Studia ekonomiczne, Nr 6(78) 2015, s. 159-167pl
dc.identifier.issn1506-7637-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/4458-
dc.description.abstractPodlaskie Voivodship is located in a climatic zone perceived as unfavourable for pear production. This study examines production, trade and consumption of pears in Poland and argues that Podlaskie Voivodship can exploit the existing demand for pears in the region given the physiological opportunities resulting from the phenomenon known as parthenocarpy. Parthenocarpy permits production of pears despite the flower damaging spring frosts. Regionally important pear cultivars are recognized and consumed by residents in the area and in the neighbouring countries located to the East and Northeast of Podlasie. Although Podlaskie Voivodship plays a secondary role in tree fruit production in Poland, pear production is relatively more important in the region than in the country as a whole. Moreover, it appears that the pattern of large and small crops in the region and in Poland follow different pattern making Podlaskie Voivodship a reliable supplier of pears in when the pear crop may be particularly small in the country as a whole. The growing popularity of pears with Polish consumers and preferences for the familiar cultivars such as ’Beurre Alexandre Lucas’ or ‘Conference’ produced in the region bodes well for producers, but attention to quality is necessary in the very competitive fresh fruit market. Additional markets in the neighbroing countries may offer additional opportunities for growers, who could expand pear production and benefit the regional economy.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.subjectfruit demandpl
dc.subjectparthenocarpypl
dc.subjectpear varietypl
dc.subjectquality attributepl
dc.subjectconsumer preferencespl
dc.titleOpportunities for Horticultural Production in Podlaskie Voivodhsip: Pears for Fresh Fruit Marketpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/ose.2015.06.78.12-
dc.description.EmailWojciech J. Florkowski: wojciech@uga.edupl
dc.description.EmailGrzegorz Łysiak: glysiak@up.poznan.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationProfessor Wojciech J. Florkowski – Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Georgiapl
dc.description.AffiliationDr inż. Grzegorz Łysiak – Faculty of Horticulture, Poznan University of Life Sciencespl
dc.description.referencesAtlas Klimatu Polski, 2005, IMGW, Warszawa.pl
dc.description.referencesBabicz-Zielinska E. 1999 Food Preferences among the Polish Young Adults, “Food Quality and Preference”, 10, pp. 139-145.pl
dc.description.referencesBadanie produkcji roślinnej. Produkcja ogrodnicza. Badanie sadów, 2005, GUS, 20.06.2015 r., pp. 14.pl
dc.description.referencesBłaszczyk J., Łysiak G. 2001 Storage Properties of Czech Pear Cultivars Erica and Dicolor, “Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research”, IX (1-4), pp. 71-76.pl
dc.description.referencesCaputo V., Canavari M. V., Nayga R. M. Jr. 2012 Selected Poster Paper Presented at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, August 12‐14.pl
dc.description.referencesCzernyszewicz E. 2007 Zmiany w produkcji materiału wyjściowego drzewek na Lubelszczyźnie w latach 1994-2004, “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska – Lublin – Polonia”, XVII(1), Sectio EEE.pl
dc.description.referencesGallardo R. K., Kupferman E., Colonna A. 2011 Willingness to Pay for Optimal ‘Anjou’ Pear Quality, “Hortscience” 46(3), pp. 452-456.pl
dc.description.referencesGamble J., Jeager S. R., Harker F. R. 2006 Preferences on Pear Appearance and Response to Novelty among Australia and New Zealand Consumers, “Postharvest Technology and Biology”, 41, pp. 38-47.pl
dc.description.referencesGustafson F. G. 1942 Parthenocarpy: Natural and Artificial, “Bot. Rev.”, 8(9), pp. 599-654.pl
dc.description.referencesHeijerman-Peppelman G., Bucarciuc V., Kemp H., Pasat O. 2009 'Xenia', A New Pear Cultivar from Moldova, First Results in the Netherlands, “Acta Horticulturae”, 814, DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.814.47, pp. 305-308.pl
dc.description.referencesHeinze W., Schreiber D. 1984 Eine neue Kartierung der Winterhärtezonen für Gehölze in Europa, „Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft”, 75, pp. 11-56.pl
dc.description.referencesImport gruszek do Polski w 2013 roku, 2015, GUS, available online at http://www.fresh-market.pl/owoce_i_warzywa/owoce/grusze/import_gruszek_do_polski_w_2013_roku,p1810508680, accessed: 24.02.2015.pl
dc.description.referencesKacprzak E. 2004 Zmiany przestrzenne sadownictwa w Polsce 1990-2002, „Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu”, CCCLX, Ogrodn. 38, pp. 69-82.pl
dc.description.referencesKlepacka A. M., Meng T., Florkowski W. J. 2014 Apples or Oranges – Recent Household Fruit Consumption in Poland, „Zeszyty Naukowe SERiA”, 16 (6), pp. 255-259.pl
dc.description.referencesŁysiak G. 2006 Uprawa i odmiany gruszy, Hortpress, Warszawa.pl
dc.description.referencesŁysiak G. P., Antkowiak W. 2015 Quality Features of Parthenocarpic Pears Collected from Trees Grown on Different Rootstocks, „Acta Sciientarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus”,14 (5), pp. 69-82.pl
dc.description.referencesMoffitt K. 2002 Conditioned Fruit: Is it what Consumers are Looking for?, Proceedings of the Washington Tree Fruit Postharvest Conference, March 12-13, Yakima, Washington, USA, Available online at http://postharvest.tfrec.wsu.edu/PC2002H.pdf, accessed 21.04.2015.pl
dc.description.referencesPlocharski W. J., Konopacka D. 1999 The Relation between Mechanical and Sensory Parameters of Apples and Pears, „Acta Horticulturae”, 485, DOI: 10.17660/Acta Hortic.1999.485.43, pp. 309-318.pl
dc.description.referencesRocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2012, 2013, GUS, Warszawa, available online at http://stat.gov.pl/cps/rde/xbcr/gus/rs_rocznik_rolnictwa_2012.pdf. Accessed on February 26, 2015.pl
dc.description.referencesRocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2014, 2014, GUS, Warszawa, available online at http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/rocznik-statystyczny-rolnictwa-2014,6,8.html, accessed 02.11.2015.pl
dc.description.referencesRynek owoców w Polsce, 2014, Agencja Rynku Rolnego, Warszawa.pl
dc.description.referencesUprawy ogrodnicze – Powszechny Spis Rolny 2010, 2012, GUS, Warszawa, pp, 133.pl
dc.description.referencesWyniki badań GUS. Produkcja ogrodnicza. Badanie sadów w 2012 roku, 2013, GUS, Warszawa, pp. 16.pl
dc.description.pages159-167pl
dc.description.number6(78)-
dc.description.firstpage159-
dc.description.lastpage167-
dc.identifier.citation2Optimum. Studia ekonomicznepl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 2015, nr 6(78)

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
12_Florkowski_Lysiak.pdf209,78 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)