REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/2479
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorPlucker, Jonathan A.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-26T08:26:13Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-26T08:26:13Z-
dc.date.issued2014-12-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 2014, pp. 228-232.pl
dc.identifier.issn2354-0036-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/2479-
dc.description.abstractGlăveanu (2014b) provides a wide-ranging analysis and critique of the science of creativity. Many of his points are fair and reasonable, and addressing the questions he poses will unquestionably advance the field. But definitional issues receive too much attention, and some of the arguments are over-extended. The six recommendations are difficult to argue against, but would following all of them lead to the more impactful field that Glăveanu desires?pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherFaculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Bialystokpl
dc.subjectParadigmatic assumptionspl
dc.subjectCulturepl
dc.subjectDefinitionspl
dc.titleA Critical Response to “The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading”pl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/ctra.2014.01.02.09-
dc.description.Emailjonathan.plucker@uconn.edupl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Connecticut, USApl
dc.description.volume1-
dc.description.issue2-
dc.description.firstpage228-
dc.description.lastpage232-
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2014, Vol. 1, Issue 2

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons