REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/2185
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKulesza, Cezary-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T08:08:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T08:08:39Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, z. 15, 2014, s. 103-116pl
dc.identifier.issn1689-7404-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/2185-
dc.description.abstractThe author deals with the right to appeal against judgments issued in negotiated case-ending settlements in the light of Art. 2 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Polish Constitution. The analysis includes ECHR case law which indicates that the possibility of appeal against court decisions is one of the guarantees of the right to defense. It also highlights the judgments of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court concerning the principle of two-instance appeal proceedings, the right to trial and the reformationis in peius prohibition. From these considerations it is concluded that the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure of 1997 meets, but only in ordinary mode of proceedings, both standards: the standard adopted in Protocol No. 7 of the Convention and the constitutional standard. Considerations also included changes in the consensual modes of criminal proceedings introduced by the reform of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure of 27 September 2013, which points out, inter alia, that the primary limitation of the right to appeal against the judgments issued in these modes is amended Art. 447 § 5, in that it provides to persons convicted of using one of such modes of proceedings (Art. 343, Art. 343a and Art. 387 of the Code) non-appointment as grounds for appeal error of fact and fl agrant disproportion of penalties and of penal measures (art.438 paragraph .3 and 4), which are related to the content of the agreement. Such limitations justify the fear that such fi nal judgments may violate the principle of criminal accurate response (Article 2 § 1 point 1 of the Code), or the principle of material truth (Article 2 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).pl
dc.language.isoplpl
dc.publisherTemida 2pl
dc.subjectreform of criminal procedurepl
dc.subjectconsensual modes of proceedingspl
dc.subjectlimitation of the right to appealpl
dc.subjectconstitutional standardpl
dc.subjectprinciple of material truthpl
dc.subjecterror of factpl
dc.titleZaskarżanie wyroków zapadłych w trybach konsensualnych – standard europejski i prawo polskiepl
dc.title.alternativeChallenging judgments issued in consensual modes of criminal proceedings – European standard and Polish lawpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/bsp.2014.15.07-
dc.description.AffiliationUniwersytet w Białymstokupl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Artykuły naukowe (WP)
Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2014, Z. 15

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
BSP_15_2014_Kulesza.pdf338,99 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycje w RUB są chronione prawem autorskim, z zastrzeżeniem wszelkich praw, chyba że zaznaczono inaczej.