REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/21186
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorDomagała, Wiktoria-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-06T07:04:48Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-06T07:04:48Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.citationOptimum. Economic Studies, Nr 3(125) 2026, s. 291-308pl
dc.identifier.issn1506-7637-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/21186-
dc.description.abstractPurpose | The purpose of this article is to examine board-level gender diversity in se¬lected Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, in light of European Union (EU) targets for women’s participation in corporate governance.Research method | The study employs a descriptive-comparative research design, based on structural indicator analysis tracking gender representation in corporate boards across the four selected countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland) over the years 2014–2024. The empirical analysis draws on publicly available data from four international sources (Eurostat, the European Institute for Gender Equality, the International Labour Organisation, the World Value Survey), and is complemented by a selective review of theoretical and empirical literature on vertical occupational gender segregation, corporate governance and EU gender equality policy.Results | The empirical analysis reveals persistent underrepresentation of women on corporate boards in all four countries throughout the observed period. According to the study none of the analysed countries has met the EU targets. The analysis further identifies employment gaps, childcare provision shortfalls and cultural attitudes to¬wards gender roles as structural correlates of this underrepresentation. Originality / value / implications / recommendations | The study offers a comparative perspective on board-level gender diversity in the Baltic States and Poland, linked to EU targets and a theoretical framework. It highlights the need for research beyond large, listed companies and underscores that achieving a critical mass of female rep¬resentation is essential for meaningful influence in corporate governance.pl
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was supported by funds granted by the Minister of Science of the Republic of Poland under the “Regional Initiative for Excellence” Programme for the implementation of the project “The Poznań University of Economics and Business for Economy 5.0: Regional Initiative – Global Effects (RIGE)”.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.subjectgender inequalitypl
dc.subjectglass ceilingpl
dc.subjectoccupational segregationpl
dc.titleVertical Occupational Gender Segregation at the Board Level: Evidence from Selected CEE Countriespl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Uniwersytet w Białymstokupl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/oes.2026.03.125.15-
dc.description.Emailwiktoria.domagala@ue.poznan.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationPoznań University of Economics and Business, Polandpl
dc.description.referencesAdams R.B., Funk P., 2012, Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?, “Management Science”, vol. 58(2), pp.219−235.pl
dc.description.referencesBaltina I., Uvarova I., 2015, Gender Balance in Corporate Boards and in Top Management in Latvia, “Economic Science for Rural Development”, vol. 113.pl
dc.description.referencesBanerjee S., Wahl M.F., 2022, Corporate Governance in Estonia: Equilibrium on Board, “Creşterea economică în condiţiile globalizării”, pp. 65−79.pl
dc.description.referencesBertrand M., Black S.E., Jensen S., Lleras-Muney A., 2019, Breaking the Glass Ceiling? The Effect of Board Quotas on Female Labour Market Outcomes in Norway, “The Review of Economic Studies”, vol. 86(1), pp. 191−239.pl
dc.description.referencesBohdanowicz L., 2011, Zróżnicowanie organów statutowych pod względem płci a wyniki finansowe polskich spółek publicznych, “Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Ekonomia”, vol. 42, pp. 105−118.pl
dc.description.referencesByrka-Kita K., Arcisz M., 2016, Sukcesje kobiet w spółkach publicznych notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Finanse, “Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia”, vol. 82, pp. 31−43.pl
dc.description.referencesCiappei C., Liberatore G., Manetti G., 2023, A Systematic Literature Review of Studies on Women at the top of Firm Hierarchies: Critique, Gap Analysis and Future Research Directions, “Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal”, vol. 14(7), pp. 202−231.pl
dc.description.referencesCorrell S.J., Benard S., Paik I., 2007, Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?, “American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 112(5), pp. 1297−1338.pl
dc.description.referencesCouncil of the European Union, 2011, Council Conclusions of 7 March 2011 on the European Pact for Gender Equality 2011–2020. (2011/C 155/02), “Official Journal of the European Union”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2011_155_R_0010_01 [date of access: 1.10.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesDomagała W., 2019, Segregacja zawodowa według płci w krajach OECD, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa,pl
dc.description.referencesDzene O., Sennikova I., 2020, Women’s Representation on Corporate Boards at the Global and European Level, “Journal of Business Management”, vol. 18, pp. 6–25.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission, 2016, Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016–2019, Publications Office of the European Union, DOI: 10.2838/454429.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission, 2022, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European Care Strategy, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022DC0440 [date of access: 16.10.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission, 2024, Special Eurobarometer 545 – Gender Stereotypes, DOI: 10.2838/77926.pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Commission, 2025, A Roadmap for Women’s Rights COM/2025/97 Final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0097 [date of access: 24.10.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Institute for Gender Equality, 2025a, Gender Statistics Database: Largest Listed Companies: CEOs, Executives and Non-Executives; https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs/indicator/wmidm_bus_bus__wmid_comp_compex [date of access: 27.09.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Institute for Gender Equality, 2025b, Gender Statistics Database: Largest listed Companies: Presidents, Board Members and Employee Representatives, https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs/indicator/wmidm_bus_bus__wmid_comp_compbm/metadata [date of access: 27.09.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament, 2011, Women and Business Leadership European Parliament Resolution of 6 July 2011 on Women and Business Leadership (2010/2115(INI)), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52011IP0330&qid=1751020968388 [date of access: 27.09.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament, 2022, Directive (EU) 2022/2381 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 on Improving the Gender Balance among Directors of Listed Companies and Related Measures (Text with EEA relevance), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2381/oj [date of access: 27.09.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union, 2016a, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2016/oj [date of access: 1.10.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEuropean Union, 2016b, Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union signed on 13 December 2007, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2016:202:TOC [date of access: 1.10.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesEurostat, 2025a, Children in Formal Childcare or Education by Age Group, Duration and Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion –% of Children in the Respective at Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion Situation, DOI: 10.2908/ILC_CAINDFORM25B.pl
dc.description.referencesEurostat, 2025b, Employment Rate of Adults by Sex, Age Groups, Educational Attainment Level, Number of Children and Age of Youngest child (%), DOI: 10.2908/LFST_HHEREDCH.pl
dc.description.referencesHoobler J.M., Masterson C.R., Nkomo S.M., Michel E.J., 2018, The Business Case for Women Leaders: Meta-Analysis, Research Critique, and Path forward, “Journal of Management”, vol. 44(6), pp. 2473−2499.pl
dc.description.referencesInternational Labour Organisation, 2025, Ilostat Database, https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/ [date of access: 10.10.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesKanter R.M., 1977, Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women, “American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 82(5), pp. 965−990.pl
dc.description.referencesKirsch A., 2018, The Gender Composition of Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda, “The Leadership Quarterly”, vol. 29(2), pp. 346−364.pl
dc.description.referencesKompa K., Witkowska D., 2018, Gender Diversity in the Boardrooms of Public Companies in Poland: Changes and Implications, “Montenegrin Journal of Economics”, vol. 14(1), pp. 79−92.pl
dc.description.referencesKonrad A.M., Kramer V., Erkut S., 2008, Critical Mass: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards, “Organisational Dynamics”, vol. 37(2), pp. 145−164.pl
dc.description.referencesMatsa D.A., Miller A.R., 2025, Did Board Gender Quotas Break the Glass Ceiling in Europe?, [in:] “AEA Papers and Proceedings”, vol. 115, pp. 529−535.pl
dc.description.referencesMcDonald S., 2011, What’s in the “Old Boys” Network? Accessing Social Capital in Gendered and Racialized Networks, “Social Networks”, vol. 33(4), pp. 317−330.pl
dc.description.referencesNchor D., Náplava R., 2025, Labour Market Inequality among Central and Eastern European Countries: An Emphasis on the Gender Employment and Pay Gap, “Empirical Economics”, vol. 69(6), pp. 1−32.pl
dc.description.referencesNilsen W., Skipstein A., Østby K.A., Mykletun A., 2017, Examination of the Double Burden Hypothesis – A Systematic Review of Work–Family Conflict and Sickness Absence, “The European Journal of Public Health”, vol. 27(3), pp. 465−471.pl
dc.description.referencesOECD, 2025, OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2025, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI: 10.1787/f4f43735-en.pl
dc.description.referencesOsterloh M., Rost K., 2025, Exploring the Leaky Pipeline: Tokenism, Status Group Effects, or Self-Selection?, “European Management Review”, special issue, pp. 1–25.pl
dc.description.referencesOzgirdaitė B., Stewart S., Falloon D., 2020, Glass Ceiling Effect in Lithuanian Private Sector, What Holds Women Back from Moving to the Top Positions, “Advances in Business Research”, vol. 10(1), pp. 95−106.pl
dc.description.referencesSchäfer A., Tucci I., Gottschall K., 2012, Top down or bottom up? A Cross-National Study of Vertical Occupational Sex Segregation in 12 European Countries, “Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives”, vol. 29, pp. 3−43.pl
dc.description.referencesSkare M., Gavurova B., Kovac V., 2024, Sustainability of Gender Employment and Pay Gap Types Regarding Female Participation in Corporate Management, “Environment, Development and Sustainability”, vol. 27, pp. 1−27.pl
dc.description.referencesSzarzec K., Totleben B., Piątek D., 2022, Zróżnicowanie składów zarządów i rad nadzorczych polskich spółek akcyjnych, “Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics”, vol. 309(1), pp. 79−95.pl
dc.description.referencesTaljūnaitė M., 2005, Gender Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Promoting Gender Equality in Lithuania, “Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review”, vol. 41(6), pp. 1041−1055.pl
dc.description.referencesTorchia M., Calabrò A., Huse M., 2011, Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass, “Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 102(2), pp. 299−317.pl
dc.description.referencesTotleben B., Domagała W., 2024, Efekt szklanego sufitu w radach nadzorczych i zarządach polskich spółek akcyjnych, “Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie”, vol. 72(2), pp. 79−94.pl
dc.description.referencesTyrowicz J., Terjesen S., Mazurek J., 2020, All on Board? New Evidence on Board Gender Diversity from a Large Panel of European Firms, “European Management Journal”, vol. 38(4), pp. 634−645.pl
dc.description.referencesWorld Values Survey, 2025, Wave 7: 2017−2022: Online Data Analysis, https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp [date of access: 10.10.2025].pl
dc.description.number3(125)pl
dc.description.firstpage291pl
dc.description.lastpage308pl
dc.identifier.citation2Optimum. Economic Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0244-3166-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Optimum. Economic Studies, 2026, nr 3(125)

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Optimum_3_2026_W_Domagala_Vertical_Occupational_Gender_Segregation_at_the_Board_Level.pdf201,18 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)