Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20625Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ropuszyńska-Surma, Edyta | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Węglarz, Magdalena | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-02T11:47:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-02T11:47:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Optimum. Economic Studies, Nr 2(124) 2026, s. 290-308 | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1506-7637 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20625 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose | The purpose of this article is to present a preliminary analysis of the business models (BM) of innovative enterprises in terms of their sustainability and to identify the extent to which social aspects are incorporated. Research method | The Triple Layered Business Model Canvas was applied to characterise the BMs, while the Methodological Sheets for Social Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) supported the identification of social aspects. The analysis covered selected innovative enterprises that participated as panellists in three science and technology parks, where research was conducted using the Open Space method. Results | The findings align with existing research on sustainable enterprises and business model development. Owners, managers and employees highlighted the key role of social aspects in fostering innovation. All companies adapted their BMs toward sustainability by integrating social dimensions, though to varying degrees. A stakeholder‑based perspective shows that consumer‑ and community‑related activities are the least developed, while the “workers” category is the most difficult to evaluate. Integrating social aspects into sustainable BMs may yield benefits such as attracting skilled and loyal employees, enhancing organisational resilience, strengthening dynamic capabilities and improving societal readiness for new technologies and social innovations. Originality / value / implications / recommendations | The novelty lies in applying the Triple Layered Business Model Canvas to describe the business models of innovative enterprises. Additional value is provided by the use of the Social LCA methodology to identify and characterise the social components embedded in these BMs. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku | pl |
| dc.subject | business model | pl |
| dc.subject | sustainable business model | pl |
| dc.subject | Triple Layered Business Model Canvas | pl |
| dc.subject | Social Life Cycle Assessment | pl |
| dc.subject | innovative enterprises | pl |
| dc.title | Identification of Social Elements in Business Models Based on the Example of Selected Innovative Enterprises in Poland | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Uniwersytet w Białymstoku | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15290/oes.2026.02.124.15 | - |
| dc.description.Email | Edyta Ropuszyńska-Surma: edyta.ropuszynska-surma@pwr.edu.pl | pl |
| dc.description.Email | Magdalena Węglarz: magdalena.weglarz@pwr.edu.pl | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Edyta Ropuszyńska-Surma - Wrocław University of Science and Technology | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Magdalena Węglarz - Wrocław University of Science and Technology | pl |
| dc.description.references | Benoît C., Bernard M., 2009, Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products, United Nations Environment Programme. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Benoît‑Norris C., Vickery‑Niederman G., Valdivia S., Franze J., Traverso M., Ciroth A., Mazijn B., 2011, Introducing the UNEP/SETAC Methodological Sheets for Subcategories of Social LCA, “The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment”, vol. 16(7), pp. 682–90, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-011-0301-y. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bocken N.M.P., Short S.W., Rana P., Evans S., 2014, A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 65, pp. 42–56, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Boons F., Lüdeke‑Freund F., 2013, Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State-of-the-Art and Steps towards a Research Agenda, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 45, pp. 9–19, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Carroll A.B., 2016, Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR: Taking Another Look, “International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility”, vol. 1, 3, DOI: 10.1186/s40991‑016‑0004‑6. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Curtis S.K., Mont O., 2020, Sharing Economy Business Models for Sustainability, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 266, 121519, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121519. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Elkington J., 1997, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone Publishing, Oxford. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Evans S., Vladimirova D., Holgado M., Van Fossen K., Yang M., Silva E.A., Barlow C.Y., 2017, Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, vol. 26(5), pp. 597–608, DOI: 10.1002/bse.1939. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Freeman E.R., 2010, Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach, digitally printed version, University Press, Cambridge. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Geissdoerfer M., Vladimirova D., Evans S., 2018, Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Review, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 198, pp. 401–16, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Joyce A., Paquin R.L., 2016, The Triple Layered Business Model Canvas: A Tool to Design More Sustainable Business Models, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 135, pp. 1474–86, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Karami M., Madlener R., 2021, Business Model Innovation for the Energy Market: Joint Value Creation for Electricity Retailers and Their Customers, “Energy Research and Social Science”, vol. 73, 101878, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101878. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Laukkanen M., Tura N., 2020, The Potential of Sharing Economy Business Models for Sustainable Value Creation, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 253, 120004, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120004. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Laukkanen M., Tura N., 2022, Sustainable Value Propositions and Customer Perceived Value: Clothing Library Case. “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 378, 134321, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134321. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lüdeke‑Freund F., Carroux S., Joyce A., Massa L., Breuer H., 2018, The Sustainable Business Model Pattern Taxonomy – 45 Patterns to Support Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Innovation, “Sustainable Production and Consumption”, vol. 15, pp. 145–62, DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lüdeke-Freund F., Dembek K.. 2017, Sustainable Business Model Research and Practice: Emerging Field or Passing Fancy?, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 168, pp. 1668–78, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.093. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Manninen K., Koskela S., Antikainen R., Bocken N., Dahlbo H., Aminoff A., 2018, Do Circular Economy Business Models Capture Intended Environmental Value Propositions?, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 171, pp. 413–22, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.003. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Norris S., 2023, A Matter of Framing: Analyzing Value Communication in Sustainable Business Models, “Organization and Environment”, vol. 36(4), pp. 503–528, DOI: 10.1177/10860266231178795. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y., 2010, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Schaltegger S., Lüdeke Freund F., Hansen E.G., 2012, Business Cases for Sustainability: The Role of Business Model Innovation for Corporate Sustainability, “International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development”, vol. 6(2), 95–119, DOI: 10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Schaltegger S., Hansen E.G., Lüdeke Freund F., 2016, Business Models for Sustainability: Origins, Present Research, and Future Avenues, “Organization & Environment”, vol. 29(1),pp. 3–10, DOI: 10.1177/1086026615599806. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Schoneveld G.C., 2020, Sustainable Business Models for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of Inclusive Business, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 277, 124062, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124062. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Shakeel J., Mardani A., Chofreh A.G., Goni F.A., Klemeš J.J., 2020, Anatomy of Sustainable Business Model Innovation, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 261, 121201, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121201. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Stubbs W., Cocklin C., 2008, Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model”, “Organization & Environment”, vol. 21(2), pp. 103–27, DOI: 10.1177/1086026608318042. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sureau S., Mazijn B., Garrido S.R., Achten W.M.J., 2018, Social Life-Cycle Assessment Frameworks: A Review of Criteria and Indicators Proposed to Assess Social and Socioeconomic Impacts, “The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment”, vol. 23(4), pp. 904–20, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-017-1336-5. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Traverso M., Valdivia S., Luthin A., Roche L., Arcese G., Neugebauer S., Petti L., D’Eusanio M., Tragnone B.M., Mankaa R., Hanafi J., Benoît Norris C., Zamagni A., 2021, Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) 2021, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Upward A., Jones P., 2016, An Ontology for Strongly Sustainable Business Models: Defining an Enterprise Framework Compatible With Natural and Social Science, “Organization & Environment”, vol. 29(1), pp. 97–123, DOI: 10.1177/1086026615592933 | pl |
| dc.description.references | Velter M.G.E., Bitzer V., Bocken N.M.P., Kemp R., 2020, Sustainable Business Model Innovation: The Role of Boundary Work for Multi-Stakeholder Alignment, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 247, 119497, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119497. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Wells P., Seitz M., 2005, Business Models and Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Typology, “Supply Chain Management: An International Journal”, vol. 10(4), pp. 249–51, DOI: 10.1108/13598540510612712. | pl |
| dc.description.number | 2(124) | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 290 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 308 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Optimum. Economic Studies | pl |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-0163-8810 | - |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-4201-7225 | - |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Optimum. Economic Studies, 2026, nr 2(124) | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E_Ropuszynska_Surma_M_Weglarz_Identification_of_Social_Elements.pdf | 253,58 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)
