REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20618
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorSzczepkowska-Flis, Agnieszka-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T10:31:25Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-02T10:31:25Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.citationOptimum. Economic Studies, Nr 2(124) 2026, s. 273-289pl
dc.identifier.issn1506-7637-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20618-
dc.description.abstractPurpose | The purpose of the study was to identify and compare the behavior pattern of commercial enterprises, reflected through qualitative indicators, during the period of normal volatility and the period of extraordinary instability of the business environment. It was assumed the behavior pattern is created by the inertia effect based on routines and the prediction effect based on expectations. Research method | The study used qualitative indicators (diagnoses and forecasts) from GUS business tendency surveys in the Polish trade sector. The econometric study (ARDL models and multiplier analysis) was conducted for two subperiods: the pe riod of normal volatility (01.2000–02.2020) and the period of extraordinary instability (03.2020–05.2025). Results | The inertia effect played a key role in shaping the diagnoses. Combined with the prediction effect, it created a stable behavior pattern of commercial enterprises only in the period of normal volatility. This regularity was noted for qualitative indicators of financial situation and sales. No behavior pattern was identified in the period of extraordinary instability. Originality / value / implications / recommendations | The study proved that the behavior pattern and the response of enterprises to extraordinary instability differ depending on their location in the producer–consumer supply chain.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstokupl
dc.subjectbehavior pattern of enterprisespl
dc.subjectinertia effectpl
dc.subjectprediction effectpl
dc.subjectcommercial enterprisespl
dc.subjectqualitative indicatorspl
dc.titleThe Behavior Pattern of Commercial Enterprises in Poland During Periods of Normal Volatility and Extraordinary Instability of the Business Environmentpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Uniwersytet w Białymstokupl
dc.identifier.doi10.15290/oes.2026.02.124.14-
dc.description.Emailagnieszka.szczepkowska-flis@ukw.edu.plpl
dc.description.AffiliationKazimierz Wielki Universitypl
dc.description.referencesBaleanu V., 2007, The Economic Basis in Organisational Behavior – Behavioral Theory of the Firm, “Annals of the University of Petroşani. Economics”, vol. 7, pp. 29–36.pl
dc.description.referencesBludnik I., Wallusch J., 2012, Zmiany poziomu dobrobytu w modelach wielorakiej równowagi, “Studia Ekonomiczne”, vol. 101, pp. 31–42.pl
dc.description.referencesBromiley P., Rau D., 2022, Extending the Behavioral Theory of the Firm to Entrepreneurial Firms, “Strategic Management Review”, vol. 3(1), pp. 99–123, DOI: 10.1561/111.00000038.pl
dc.description.referencesCarlstrom C.T., Fuerst T.S., 2001, Monetary Policy and Self- Fulfilling Expectations: The Danger of Forecasts, “Economic Review”, vol. QI, pp. 9–19.pl
dc.description.referencesFeldman M.S., 2000, Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change, “Organization Science”, vol. 11(6), pp. 611–629.pl
dc.description.referencesGavetti G., Greve H.R., Levinthal D.A., Ocasio W., 2012, The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects, “The Academy of Management Annals”, vol. 6(1), pp. 1–40, DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2012.656841.pl
dc.description.referencesGąsowska M.K., 2025, Logistics Supply Chain Strategies of Manufacturing and Trading Enterprises: Impact of Covid-19 and War in Ukraine, “Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology – Organization and Management Series”, vol. 217, pp. 93–114, DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2025.217.6.pl
dc.description.referencesGreve R., 2007, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm – 40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact, “Organization Science”, vol. 18(3), pp. 337–349, DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0280.pl
dc.description.referencesGUS, 2020, Wpływ pandemii koronawirusa SARS-CoV–2 na koniunkturę gospodarczą – oceny i oczekiwania, https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/koniunktura/koniunktura/koniunktura-w-przetworstwie-przemyslowym-budownictwie-handlu-i-uslugach-2000–2020-kwiecien-2020-z-poglebiona-prezentacja-wynikow-dla-sekcji-zakwaterowanie-i-gastronomia,4,36.html [date of access: 14.01.2026].pl
dc.description.referencesGUS, 2022, Wpływ pandemii COVID-19 i wojny w Ukrainie na koniunkturę – oceny i oczekiwania, https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5516/6/19/1/aneks_do_publikacji_koniunktura_w_przetworstwie_przemyslowym_budownictwie_handlu_i_uslugach_2000–2022_kwiecien_2022.pdf [date of access: 14.01.2026].pl
dc.description.referencesGUS, 2023, Zeszyt Metodologiczny. Badanie koniunktury gospodarczej, https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/koniunktura/koniunktura/zeszyt-metodologiczny-badanie-koniunktury-gospodarczej,5,10.html [date of access: 30.05.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesHagen M., Su W., Junge S., 2024, 60th Birthday of „A Behavioral Theory of the Firm”: A Review of the Relational Concepts and Recommendations for Future Research, “Management Review Quarterly”, vol. 74, pp. 2637–2682, DOI: 10.1007/s11301-023-00369-x.pl
dc.description.referencesHill R.C., Griffiths W.E., Lim G.C., 2011, Principles of Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England.pl
dc.description.referencesHölzl W., 2005, The Evolutionary Theory of the Firm. Routines, Complexity and Change, “Working Papers Series: Growth and Employment in Europe: Sustainability and Competitiveness”, vol. 46, Vienna University of Economics and Business, DOI: 10.57938/a85bb1d8-7921-404a-b582-4cccae621f26.pl
dc.description.referencesIsabiry J., 2021, The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Foundations, Tenets and Relevance, “Technium Social Sciences Journal”, vol. 19, pp. 324–335, https://www.techniumscience.com.techniumscience.pluscommunication.eu/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3219/1235 [date of access: 22.05.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesKamalipoor M., Akbari M., Hejazi S.R., 2025, How Technology-Based Businesses Are Re ducing Their Vulnerability During the Natural Disasters?, “Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies”, vol. 18(2), pp. 385–406, DOI: 10.22059/ijms.2025.382537.677037.pl
dc.description.referencesKowalski T., 1998, Wprowadzenie oczekiwań podmiotów gospodarczych do analizy polityki makroekonomicznej, “Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny”, vol. LX(1), pp. 99–113.pl
dc.description.referencesKrammer S.M.S., Nuruzzaman N., Mukherjee D., 2024, International Connectedness, Governmental Interventions and Firms’ Adaptation to Exogenous Shocks: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic, “Multinational Business Review”, vol. 33(2), pp. 366–397, DOI: 10.1108/MBR-07-2024-0119.pl
dc.description.referencesKuryłek W., Shachmurove Y., 2025, The Effects of COVID-19 on Polish Enterprises, “Economics and Business Review”, vol. 11(1), pp. 82–107, DOI: 10.18559/ebr.2025.1.1899.pl
dc.description.referencesŁyko J., 1992, Zasada inercji i prognozy gospodarczej, Akademia Ekonomiczna im. Oskara Langego, Wrocław, https://dbc.wroc.pl/Content/110833/Lyko_Zasada_inercji_i_prognozy_gospodarczej.pdf [date of access: 27.01.2023].pl
dc.description.referencesMandysová I., 2018, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Specifics of Czech Entrepreneurial Behavior, “E+M Economics and Management”, vol. XX1(1), pp. 85–100, DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2018-1-006.pl
dc.description.referencesNicolò G., 2020, Monetary Policy, Self-Fulfilling Expectations, and the U. S. Business Cycle, “FEDS Working Paper”, vol. 2020–2035, DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2020.035.pl
dc.description.referencesOsiyevskyy O., Shirokova G., Ehsani M., 2023, The Role of Effectuation and Causation for SME Survival amidst Economic Crisis, “International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research”, vol. 29(7), pp. 1664–1697, DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-04-2022-0350.pl
dc.description.referencesÖzşuca E.A., 2023, Firm Survival in Times of Crisis: Do Innovation and Financing Constraints Matter? Insights from the COVID-19 Pandemic, “Eastern European Economics”, vol. 61(5), pp. 421–456, DOI: 10.1080/00128775.2023.2221229.pl
dc.description.referencesRocchetta S., Upadhayay N.B., 2024, Innovation Has the Power: The Case of the Italian Automotive Sector during Economic Downturns, “International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications”, vol. 27(4), pp. 473–492, DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2021.1993158.pl
dc.description.referencesSkawińska E., Zalewski R.I., 2021, Activities of Food Retail Companies in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Context of Food Security, “Sustainability”, vol. 13(7323), pp. 1–23, DOI: 10.3390/su13137323.pl
dc.description.referencesSokołowska E., Chmielewski M., Dziadkiewicz A., 2024, Impact of Macroeconomic Shocks on Financial Performance and Risk Management: A Case Study of LPP SA During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Ukraine War, “Risks”, vol. 12(195), pp. 1–24, DOI: 10.3390/risks12120195.pl
dc.description.referencesStańczyk-Hugiet E., 2014, Routines in the Process of Organizational Evolution, “Management”, vol. 18(2), pp. 73–87, DOI: 10.2478/manment-2014-0043.pl
dc.description.referencesSzczepkowska-Flis A., Kozłowska A., 2023, A Pattern for Assessment of the Economic Situation by Enterprises in an Unstable Environment, “Humanities and Social Sciences”, vol. 30(4), pp. 257–268, DOI: 10.7862/rz.2023.hss.56.pl
dc.description.referencesSzczepkowska-Flis A., Kozłowska A., 2024, Jakościowe wskaźniki ogólnej sytuacji gospodarczej przedsiębiorstw przemysłu przetwórczego w Polsce – efekt inercji i efekt przewidywań, “Ekonomista”, vol. 3, pp. 318–333, DOI: 10.52335/ekon/188822.pl
dc.description.referencesTeece D.J., 2023, Evolutionary Economics, Routines, and Dynamic Capabilities, [in:] The Handbook of Evolutionary Economics, Nelson R., Dopfer K., Potts J., Pyka A. (eds), Routledge, https://haas.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/Evolutionary-capabilities-final.pdf [date of access: 12.05.2025].pl
dc.description.referencesTomczyk E., 2001, Racjonalność oczekiwań respondentów testu koniunktury, [in:] Analiza tendencji rozwojowych w polskiej gospodarce na podstawie testu koniunktury. Metody i wyniki, Adamowicz E., Męczarski M., Podgórska M. (eds), Prace i Materiały Instytutu Rozwoju Gospodarczego SGH, vol. 70, pp. 83–117.pl
dc.description.referencesVerbeek M., 2004, A Guide to Modern Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England.pl
dc.description.number2(124)pl
dc.description.firstpage273pl
dc.description.lastpage289pl
dc.identifier.citation2Optimum. Economic Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3946-426X-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Optimum. Economic Studies, 2026, nr 2(124)

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
A_Szczepkowska_Flis_The_Behavior_Pattern_of_Commercial_Enterprises.pdf272,72 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja jest chroniona prawem autorskim (Copyright © Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone)