REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2024, Vol. 11, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20233
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorMonroy, Ernesto-
    dc.contributor.authorGutierrez-Gonzalez, Lisseth-
    dc.contributor.authorBarrios, Diana-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-05-04T07:28:56Z-
    dc.date.available2026-05-04T07:28:56Z-
    dc.date.issued2024-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2024, pp. 151-167pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20233-
    dc.description.abstractThis qualitative research addresses the psychological study of the confluence between aesthetic experience and creative process in cultural entrepreneurs, taking into account that research in Psychology of Aesthetics and Psychology of Creativity is necessary to achieve a better understanding of innovation in creative industries. We conducted a qualitative study on the role of aesthetic experience in the creative process, through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 12 expert cultural entrepreneurs from the Colombian Caribbean. As a result of a thematic analysis, we found that aesthetic experience is a relevant guide in the creativity of cultural entrepreneurs, usually represented in receptivity to aes thetic sensations that emerge during the creative process. Also, in the midst of the creative process, the entrepreneurs try to maintain a balance between individual and collective needs.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjectaesthetic experiencepl
    dc.subjectcreativitypl
    dc.subjectcultural entrepreneurspl
    dc.subjectcreative industriespl
    dc.subjectqualitative researchpl
    dc.subjectthematic analysispl
    dc.subjectpsychology of aestheticspl
    dc.subjectpsychology of creativitypl
    dc.subjectColombiapl
    dc.subjectCaribbeanpl
    dc.titleAesthetic Experience and Creativity of Expert Cultural Entrepreneurs in Colombia: A Qualitative Studypl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2025 Ernesto Monroy, Lisseth Gutierrez-Gonzalez, Diana Barrios, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2024-0015-
    dc.description.EmailErnesto Monroy: monroye@uninorte.edu.copl
    dc.description.AffiliationErnesto Monroy - Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombiapl
    dc.description.AffiliationLisseth Gutierrez-Gonzalez - University of Southern Queensland, Australiapl
    dc.description.AffiliationDiana Barrios - Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombiapl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. & Pratt, M.G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001pl
    dc.description.referencesAn, D. & Youn, N. (2018). The inspirational power of arts on creativity. Journal of Business Research, 85, 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.025pl
    dc.description.referencesAnokhin, S. & Wincent, J. (2012). Start-up rates and innovation: A cross-country examination. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.47pl
    dc.description.referencesArden, R., Chavez, R., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015pl
    dc.description.referencesAustin Z. & Sutton J. (2014). Qualitative research: getting started. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(6), 436-40. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406pl
    dc.description.referencesBouchiki, H. (1993). A constructivist framework for understanding entrepreneurship performance. Organization Studies, 14, 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400405pl
    dc.description.referencesBraun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oapl
    dc.description.referencesChatterjee, A. & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003pl
    dc.description.referencesChavez, M. & Zambrano, M. (2006). From blanqueamiento to reindigenización: Paradoxes of mestizaje and multiculturalism in contemporary Colombia. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 80, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.9652pl
    dc.description.referencesChiecher, A., Elisondo, R., Paoloni, P., & Donolo, D. (2018). Creatividad, género y rendimiento académico en ingresantes de ingeniería. Revista iberoamericana de educación superior, 9(24), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2018.24.266pl
    dc.description.referencesCreswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesFord, C.M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112–1142. https://doi.org/10.2307/259166pl
    dc.description.referencesFlick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed). Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesFrey, B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (Vols. 1–4). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139pl
    dc.description.referencesGuest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903pl
    dc.description.referencesGuilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487pl
    dc.description.referencesGüss, D., Tuason, M., Göltenboth, N., & Mironova, A. (2018). Creativity Through the Eyes of Professional Artists in Cuba, Germany, and Russia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(2), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117730817pl
    dc.description.referencesHennessey, B. & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416pl
    dc.description.referencesHindle, K. (2010). How community context affects entrepreneurial process: A diagnostic framework. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 599–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.522057pl
    dc.description.referencesHorsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.xpl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688pl
    dc.description.referencesKline, T. (2017). Sample issues, methodological implications, and best practices. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 49(2), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000054pl
    dc.description.referencesKoellinger, P. (2008) Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Business Economics, 31, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9107-0pl
    dc.description.referencesKrumm, G., Arán, V., & Bustos, D. (2014). Inteligencia y creatividad: correlatos entre los constructos a través de dos estudios empíricos. Universitas Psychologica, 13(4), 1531–2143. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-4.icccpl
    dc.description.referencesLeder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811pl
    dc.description.referencesLeder, H. & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode—Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084pl
    dc.description.referencesLong, H. (2014). An empirical review of research methodologies and methods in creativity studies (2003-2012). Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.961781pl
    dc.description.referencesMiles, M. (1979). Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392365pl
    dc.description.referencesMonroy, E., Gutierrez-Gonzalez, L., & Barrios, D. (2023). Creatividad, organizaciones y trabajo. Una revisión bibliográfica sobre estudios cualitativos. Interdisciplinaria. Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 40(3), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2023.40.3.2pl
    dc.description.referencesMumford, M.D. & Gustafson, S.D. (1988). Creativity Syndrome: Integration, Application, and Innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27pl
    dc.description.referencesMuñoz, F. (2011). Construcciones de la neurociencia al entendimiento de la creatividad humana. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 23(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ARIS.2011.v23.n2.36253pl
    dc.description.referencesPeasgood, T., Mackenzie, B., Devlin, N., Rowen, D., Yang, Y., & Kim, D. (2023). Randomised comparison of online interviews versus face-to-face interviews to value health states. Social Science & Medicine, 323(2), 115818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115818pl
    dc.description.referencesRobledo, I., Hester, K., Peterson, D., Barrett, J., Day, E., Hougen, D., & Mumford, M. (2012). Errors and understanding: The effects of error-management training on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677352pl
    dc.description.referencesRomo, M. (1998). Teorías implícitas y creatividad artística. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 10, 11–28.pl
    dc.description.referencesRomo, M. & Alfonso, V. (2003). Implicit theories of Spanish painters. Creativity Research Journal, 15(4), 409 –415. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_pl
    dc.description.referencesSavaş, E.B., Verwijmeren, T., & van Lier, R. (2021). Aesthetic experience and creativity in interactive art. Art & Perception, 9(2), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10024pl
    dc.description.referencesSilvia, P.J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J.C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024071pl
    dc.description.referencesSirelkhatim, F. & Gangi, Y (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business & Management, 2, 105203. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1052034pl
    dc.description.referencesSmith, J.K. & Tinio, P.P.L. (2014). Introduction by the editors. In P.P.L. Tinio & J. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesShusterman, R. (1997). The end of aesthetic experience. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 55, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/431602pl
    dc.description.referencesUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2003). Address by Mr Koïchiro Matsuura Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) on the occasion of the second Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity and the award of the Arirang and Samarkand Taronasi Prizes for safeguarding, protecting and promoting cultural spaces or forms of popular or traditional cultural expression proclaimed by UNESCO as “Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity”. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000132537_eng?posInSet=4&queryId=ddf35e0a-6c51-4521-8e4c-fa9dbbef4b14pl
    dc.description.referencesWong, H.Y.H. & Chan, C.K.Y. (2021). A systematic review on the learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education within higher education settings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2021583pl
    dc.description.referencesWoodman, R., Sawyer, J.E., & Griffin, R.W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761pl
    dc.description.referencesYeh, Y.-C., Hsu, W.-C., & Yastrubinskiy, E. (2021). Decomposing the influences of aesthetic experience processes on creativity learning through various consciousness interventions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100756pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume11pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage151pl
    dc.description.lastpage167pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1810-7482-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9327-5676-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9620-9815-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2024, Vol. 11, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_11_2_2024_E_Monroy_L_Gutierrez_Gonzalez_D_Barrios_Aesthetic_Experience_and_Creativity_of_Expert.pdf280,89 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons