REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2025, Vol. 12, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20204
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorPreiss, David D.-
    dc.contributor.authorSternberg, Robert J.-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-28T10:41:43Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-28T10:41:43Z-
    dc.date.issued2025-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 12, Issue 2, 2025, pp. 73-96pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20204-
    dc.description.abstractThe rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the landscape of human cognition, education, and society. This position paper explores the implications of generative AI for human intelligence, creativity, and wisdom, with a particular focus on educational contexts. Drawing on cultural, psychological, and educational theories—especially the framework of adaptive intelligence and the Teaching for Active Concerned Citizenship and Ethical Leadership (ACCEL) model—we argue that AI challenges foundational human cognitive abilities by automating tasks traditionally central to learning and intellectual, creative and ethical development. We examine how AI reshapes the cultural attributes of human intelligence and creativity—context dependence, dynamism, and modifiability—highlighting both the potential for cognitive amplification and the risks of cognitive deskilling. The paper also addresses the erosion of critical thinking and the ethical dilemmas posed by AI’s integration into education. While acknowledging the benefits of AI, such as personalized learning and enhanced productivity, we caution against overreliance and the uncritical adoption of AI-generated outputs. We advocate for an educational response that prioritizes the cultivation of analytical, creative, and ethical reasoning—skills that remain uniquely human and essential for democratic citizenship. The paper concludes by examining the motivational forces driving AI development and adoption, and by calling for a renewed commitment to preserving human autonomy, intellectual integrity, and wisdom in an increasingly machine-mediated world. Ultimately, the future of human intelligence and creativity in the age of AI will depend not only on technological advances but on the values and educational practices we choose to uphold.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThe contribution of David D. Preiss to this manuscript was made possible through support from the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID), Fondecyt Grant No. 1241777.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjecthuman intelligencepl
    dc.subjectcreativitypl
    dc.subjectwisdompl
    dc.subjectcritical thinkingpl
    dc.subjectethical reasoningpl
    dc.subjectartificial intelligencepl
    dc.titleHuman Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligencepl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2025 David D. Preiss, Robert J. Sternberg, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2025-0012-
    dc.description.EmailDavid D. Preiss: davidpreiss@uc.clpl
    dc.description.AffiliationDavid D. Preiss - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chilepl
    dc.description.AffiliationRobert J. Sternberg - Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USApl
    dc.description.referencesAlbright, M.K., & Woodward, W. (2018). Fascism: A warning. HarperCollins.pl
    dc.description.referencesApplebaum, A. (2020). Twilight of democracy: The seductive lure of authoritarianism. Doubleday.pl
    dc.description.referencesBaker, D.P., Eslinger, P.J., Benavides, M., Peters, E., Dieckmann, N.F., & Leon, J. (2015). The cognitive impact of the education revolution: A possible cause of the Flynn Effect on population IQ. Intelligence, 49, 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.003pl
    dc.description.referencesBarnett, S.M., Rindermann, H., Williams, W.M., & Ceci, S.J. (2011). Society and intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg & S.B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 666–682). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.034pl
    dc.description.referencesBastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcý, O., & Mariman, R. (2024). Generative AI can harm learning. The Wharton School Research Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895486pl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2010). Nurturing creativity in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesBereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesBoden, M.A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1–2), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1pl
    dc.description.referencesBoden, M.A. (2009). Computer models of creativity. AI Magazine, 30(3), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i3.2254pl
    dc.description.referencesBoers, J., Etty, T., Baars, M., & van Broekhoven, K. (2025). Exploring cognitive strategies in human-AI interaction: ChatGPT’s role in creative tasks. Journal of Creativity, 35(1), 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100095pl
    dc.description.referencesBratsberg, B., & Rogeberg, O. (2018). Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(26), 6674–6678. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718793115pl
    dc.description.referencesBruner, J. (1962). On knowing: essays for the left hand. Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesBundy, A. (2017). Smart machines are not a threat to humanity. Communications of the ACM, 60(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2950042pl
    dc.description.referencesBurn-Murdoch, J. (2025, March 14). Have humans passed peak brain power? Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/a8016c64-63b7-458b-a371-e0e1c54a13fcpl
    dc.description.referencesCeci, S.J. (1996). On intelligence: a bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCeci, S.J., & Williams, W.M. (2022). Challenges for intelligence today: Combatting misinformation and fake news. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence in context: The cultural and historical foundations of human intelligence (pp. 339–357). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92798-1_14pl
    dc.description.referencesCellan-Jones, R. (2014, December 2). Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540pl
    dc.description.referencesChen, Q., Jing, Y., Gong, Y., & Tan, J. (2025). Will users fall in love with ChatGPT? a perspective from the triangular theory of love. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114982pl
    dc.description.referencesClaro, M., Preiss, D.D., San Martin, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J.E., Valenzuela, S., Cortes, F., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004pl
    dc.description.referencesCole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCole, M. (2005). Cross-cultural and historical perspectives on the developmental consequences of education. Human Development, 48(4), 195–216. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000086855pl
    dc.description.referencesCole, M., & Derry, J. (2005). We have met technology and it is us. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 209–228). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesCorazza, G.E., Agnoli, S., Jorge Artigau, A., Beghetto, R.A., Bonnardel, N., Coletto, I., Faiella, A., Gerardini, K., Gilhooly, K., Glăveanu, V.P., Hanson, M.H., Kapoor, H., Kaufman, J.C., Kenett, Y.N., Kharkhurin, A.V., Luchini, S., Mangion, M., Mirabile, M., Obialo, F.-K., … Lubart, T. (2025). Cyber-creativity: A decalogue of research challenges. Journal of Intelligence, 13(8), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13080103pl
    dc.description.referencesDavis, E., & Marcus, G. (2015). Commonsense reasoning and commonsense knowledge in artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 58(9), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701413pl
    dc.description.referencesDiaz, B., & Nussbaum, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence for teaching and learning in schools: The need for pedagogical intelligence. Computers & Education, 217, 105071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105071pl
    dc.description.referencesDick, P.K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep? Doubleday.pl
    dc.description.referencesDoshi, A.R., & Hauser, O.P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10(28). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290pl
    dc.description.referencesFlynn, J.R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171pl
    dc.description.referencesFlynn, J.R. (2011). Secular changes in intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg & S.B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 647–665). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.033pl
    dc.description.referencesFromm, E. (1961). Escape from freedom. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.pl
    dc.description.referencesGreenfield, P.M. (2020). Historical evolution of intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 916–939). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770422.039pl
    dc.description.referencesHagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8pl
    dc.description.referencesHaidt, J. (2024). The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Penguin Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesHartley, I., & Viskontas, I. (2023). How technology is changing creativity. In D.D. Preiss, J.C. Kaufman, & M. Singer (Eds.), Creativity, innovation, and change across cultures (pp. 391–412). Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28206-5_15pl
    dc.description.referencesHill, K. (2025a, January 15). She is in love with ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/15/technology/ai-chatgpt-boyfriend-companion.htmlpl
    dc.description.referencesHill, K. (2025b, May 14). The professors are using ChatGPT, and some students aren’t happy about it. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/14/technology/chatgpt-college-professors.htmlpl
    dc.description.referencesHutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesJames, K.H. (2017). The importance of handwriting experience on the development of the literate brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417709821pl
    dc.description.referencesJones, D. (2025, October 7). Why Grok fell in love with Hitler. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/07/10/musk-grok-hitler-ai-00447055pl
    dc.description.referencesJonze, S. (Director). (2013). Her [Video recording]. Warner Bros.pl
    dc.description.referencesJordan, J. (2009). A social cognition framework for examining moral awareness in managers and academics. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9706-3pl
    dc.description.referencesKhalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145pl
    dc.description.referencesMarrone, R., Cropley, D., & Medeiros, K. (2024). How does narrow AI impact human creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2024.2378264pl
    dc.description.referencesMarsh, E.J., & Rajaram, S. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001pl
    dc.description.referencesMartorell, R. (1998). Nutrition and the worldwide rise in IQ scores. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Longterm gains in IQ and related measures (pp. 183–206). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10270-006pl
    dc.description.referencesMaynard, A.E., Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P.M. (2005). Technology and the development of intelligence: From the loom to the computer. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 29–54). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesMcCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & & Shannon, C.E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.htmlpl
    dc.description.referencesMcClelland, D.C. (1988). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878289pl
    dc.description.referencesMedeiros, K., Cropley, D.H., Marrone, R. L., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2025). Human-AI cocreativity: Does ChatGPT make us more creative? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70022pl
    dc.description.referencesNettelbeck, T., Zwalf, O., & Stough, C. (2020). Basic processes of intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 471–503). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770422.021pl
    dc.description.referencesNeubauer, A.C. (1997). The mental speed approach to the assessment of intelligence. In J. Kingma & W. Tomic (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Reflections on the concept of intelligence, Vol. 4. (pp. 149–173). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesNickerson, R. S. (2005). Technology and cognition amplification. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 3–28). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesNiloy, A.C., Akter, S., Sultana, N., Sultana, J., & Rahman, S.I.U. (2024). Is Chatgpt a menace for creative writing ability? An experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12929pl
    dc.description.referencesOlson, D.R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesOlson, D.R. (1996). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition, 60(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00705-6pl
    dc.description.referencesOlson, D.R. (2005). Technology and intelligence in a literate society. In D.D. Preiss & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 58–67). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesO’Madagain, C., & Tomasello, M. (2022). Shared intentionality, reason-giving and the evolution of human culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1843). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0320pl
    dc.description.referencesOrwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. Secker and Warburg.pl
    dc.description.referencesPanella, C. (2024, August 12). The US and some of its allies just pulled off a milestone first by letting AI target enemies like it would in a war. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/us-allies-ai-target-enemies-like-would-war-first-time-2024-8pl
    dc.description.referencesPiaget, J. (1960). The psychology of intelligence. Littlefield, Adams.pl
    dc.description.referencesPietschnig, J., & Gittler, G. (2015). A reversal of the Flynn effect for spatial perception in German-speaking countries: Evidence from a cross-temporal IRT-based meta-analysis (1977–2014). Intelligence, 53, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.10.004pl
    dc.description.referencesPreiss, D.D. (2022). Human intelligence in the time of the anthropocene. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence in context: The cultural and historical foundations of human intelligence (pp. 361–391). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92798-1_15pl
    dc.description.referencesPreiss, D.D., & Sternberg, R.J. (2005). Technologies for working intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 183–208). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesRafner, J., Beaty, R.E., Kaufman, J.C., Lubart, T., & Sherson, J. (2023). Creativity in the age of generative AI. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(11), 1836–1838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01751-1pl
    dc.description.referencesRaven, J.C. (1941). Standardization of progressive matrices, 1938. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 19, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1941.tb00316.xpl
    dc.description.referencesReisner, A. (2025, March 20). The unbelievable scale of AI’s pirated-books problem. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/03/libgen-metaopenai/682093pl
    dc.description.referencesRoot-Bernstein, R. (2025). An art-science perspective on artificial intelligence creativity: From problem finding to materiality and embodied cognition. Journal of Creativity, 35(2), 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100097pl
    dc.description.referencesRyan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSalomon, G., & Perkins, D. (2005). Do technologies make us smarter? Intellectual amplification with, of, and through technology. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 71–86). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesSchmandt-Besserat, D. (2012). Tokens as precursors of writing. In E.L. Grigorenko, E. Mambrino, & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Writing: A mosaic of new perspectives (pp. 1–10). Psychology Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesScott, R. (Director). (1982). Blade runner [Video recording]. Warner Bros.pl
    dc.description.referencesScribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesStanley, J. (2018). How fascism works: The politics of us and them. Random House.pl
    dc.description.referencesStanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(3), 225–247.pl
    dc.description.referencesStanovich, K.E., West, R.F., & Toplak, M.E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2000). Giftedness as developing expertise. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks, R.J. Sternberg, & R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 55–66). Elsevier.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2004). What is wisdom and how can we develop it? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260097pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2021). Adaptive intelligence: surviving and thriving in times of uncertainty. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2024a). A new model of giftedness for transformational active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership. Gifted Education International, 40(2), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241246497pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2024b). Do not worry that generative AI may compromise human creativity or intelligence in the future: It already has. Journal of Intelligence, 12(7), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12070069pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J., & Preiss, D.D. (2022). Conclusion: Intelligence does not inhere within the individual but rather in person x task x situation interactions. In R.J. Sternberg & D.D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence in context: The cultural and historical foundations of human intelligencet (pp. 415–431). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92798-1_17pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J., & Vroom, V.H. (2002). The person versus the situation in leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 301–323.pl
    dc.description.referencesStokel-Walker, C. (2025). AI driven psychosis and suicide are on the rise, but what happens if we turn the chatbots off? BMJ, 391, r2239. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r2239pl
    dc.description.referencesTattersall, I. (2017). Why was human evolution so rapid? In A. Marom & E. Hovers (Eds.), Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology (pp. 1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_1pl
    dc.description.referencesTennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0052pl
    dc.description.referencesThurstone, L.L., & Thurstone, T.G. (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. University of Chicago Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesTomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesTomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(05), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000129pl
    dc.description.referencesTuring, A.M. (1950). I.—Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, LIX(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433pl
    dc.description.referencesTwenge, J.M., Haidt, J., Lozano, J., & Cummins, K.M. (2022). Specification curve analysis shows that social media use is linked to poor mental health, especially among girls. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103512pl
    dc.description.referencesUrban, M., Děchtěrenko, F., Lukavsky, J., Hrabalova, V., Svacha, F., Brom, C., & Urban, K. (2024). ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 215, 105031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031pl
    dc.description.referencesVan der Weel, F.R. (Ruud), & Van der Meer, A.L.H. (2024). Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219945pl
    dc.description.referencesVinchon, F., Lubart, T., Bartolotta, S., Gironnay, V., Botella, M., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Burkhardt, J., Bonnardel, N., Corazza, G.E., Glăveanu, V., Hanchett Hanson, M., Ivcevic, Z., Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J.C., Okada, T., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Gaggioli, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence & creativity: A manifesto for collaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(4), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.597pl
    dc.description.referencesWarschauer, M. (2008). Laptops and literacy: A multi-site case study. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800701771614pl
    dc.description.referencesWinter, E.L., Trudel, S.M., & Kaufman, A.S. (2024). Wait, where’s the Flynn effect on the WAIS-5? Journal of Intelligence, 12(11), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110118pl
    dc.description.referencesXu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., Qiu, J., Hua, K., Su, W., Wu, J., Xu, H., Han, Y., Fu, C., Yin, Z., Liu, M., … Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4), 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179pl
    dc.description.referencesYan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024). Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10), 1839–1850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5pl
    dc.description.referencesZawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V.I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0pl
    dc.description.referencesZhang, J., & Norman, D.A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume12pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage73pl
    dc.description.lastpage96pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4646-5060-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7191-5169-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2025, Vol. 12, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_12_2_2025_DD_Preiss_RJ_Sternberg_Human_Intelligence_Creativity_and_Wisdom.pdf342,8 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons