REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2025, Vol. 12, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20189
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorPuente-Díaz, Rogelio-
    dc.contributor.authorCavazos-Arroyo, Judith-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-27T09:37:45Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-27T09:37:45Z-
    dc.date.issued2025-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 2025, pp. 102-120pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20189-
    dc.description.abstractIn one experiment, we randomly assigned participants to either generate one or three ideas to open a new business. Participants were instructed that the ideas needed to be original and effective. Afterward, participants completed a battery of questionnaires assessing metacognitive feelings, comparative evaluations of the idea generated, and some demographics. Participants in the one-idea condition generated more original ideas only when compared to the first idea generated by participants in the three-idea condition. When we made a comparison between the most original and effective idea generated in the three-idea condition, participants in the three-idea condition generated more original and effective ideas than participants in the one-idea condition. Participants in the three-idea condition were not aware that they had generated more original and effective ideas than what they thought by selecting their most creative idea. The serial order effect was supported for evaluations of originality. Conversely, the evaluations of effectiveness showed the opposite pattern. All results were interpreted in light of creative metacogniton.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjectCreative metacognitionpl
    dc.subjectIdea evaluationpl
    dc.subjectidea selectionpl
    dc.subjectmetacognitive feelingspl
    dc.subjectserial order effectpl
    dc.titleGenerating More Ideas Makes Me Feel Better, Yet I Still Like My First Idea: Metacognitive Decisions when Generating and Selecting Ideaspl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2025 Rogelio Puente-Díaz, Judith Cavazos-Arroyo, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2025-0005-
    dc.description.EmailRogelio Puente-Díaz: rogelio.puente@anahuac.mxpl
    dc.description.AffiliationRogelio Puente-Díaz - Universidad Anáhuac México. School of Business and Economics, Mexicopl
    dc.description.AffiliationJudith Cavazos-Arroyo - Centro Interdisciplinario de Posgrados, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Mexicopl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Westview Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeaty, R.E., & Silvia, P.J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029171pl
    dc.description.referencesBenedek, M., & Lebuda, I. (2024). Managing your muse: Exploring three levels of metacognitive control in creative ideation. Creativity Research Journal.pl
    dc.description.referencesDunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesEfklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001pl
    dc.description.referencesGeiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. Guilford Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesGonthier, C., & Besançon, M. (2022). It is not always better to have more ideas: Serial order and the trade-off between fluency and elaboration in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000485pl
    dc.description.referencesKoriat, A. (2006). Are we frightened because we run away? Some evidence from metacognitive feelings. In B. Uttl, N. Ohta, & A.L. Siegenthaler (Eds.), Memory and emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 83-103). Blackwell.pl
    dc.description.referencesKoriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36pl
    dc.description.referencesLebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2023). A systematic framework of creative metacognition. Physics of Life Review, 46, 161–181.pl
    dc.description.referencesLebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2024). Contributions of metacognition to creative performance and behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior.pl
    dc.description.referencesLinchfield, R.C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649–668.pl
    dc.description.referencesLucas, B.J., & Nordgren, L.F. (2020). The creative cliff illusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(33), 19830–19836. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005620117pl
    dc.description.referencesLucas, B., & Mai, K.M. (2022). Illumination and elbow grease: A theory of how mental models of the creative process influence creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 168, 104107pl
    dc.description.referencesMedeiros, K.E., Partlow, P.J., & Mumford, M.D. (2014). Not too much, not too little: The influence of constraints on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036210pl
    dc.description.referencesMueller, J.S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J.A. (2012). The Bias Against Creativity: Why People Desire but Reject Creative Ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018pl
    dc.description.referencesMumford, M.D., Hester, K.S., Robledo, I.C., Peterson, D.R., Day, E.A., Hougen, D.F., & Barrett, J.D. (2012). Mental models and creative problem-solving: The relationship of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730008pl
    dc.description.referencesMumford, M.D., Martin, R., Elliott, S., & McIntosh, T. (2020). Creative failure: Why can’t people solve creative problems. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.372pl
    dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R. (2023). Metacognitive feelings as a source of information for the creative process: A conceptual exploration. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 49.pl
    dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2020). Creative metacognitive feelings as a source of information for creative self-efficacy, creativity potential, intrapersonal idea selection, and task enjoyment. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 499–507.pl
    dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2022). Creative self-efficacy and metacognitive feelings as sources of information when generating evaluating, and selecting creative ideas: A metacognitive perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56, 647–658.pl
    dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2021). Metacognitive feelings as a source of information in the evaluation and selection of creative ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100767.pl
    dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R., Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Puerta-Sierra, L. (2021). Idea generation, selection and evaluation: A metacognitive approach. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55, 1015-1027.pl
    dc.description.referencesReiter-Palmon, R., & Arreola, N.J. (2015). Does generating multiple ideas lead to increased creativity? A comparison of generating one idea vs. many. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087274pl
    dc.description.referencesSchwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2pl
    dc.description.referencesSchwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195pl
    dc.description.referencesSchwarz, N., Jalbert, M., Noah, T., & Zhang, L. (2021). Metacognitive experiences as information: Processing fluency in consumer judgment and decision making. Consumer Psychology Review, 4(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1067pl
    dc.description.referencesSidi, Y., Torgovitsky, I., Soibelman, D., Miron-Spektor, E., & Ackerman, R. (2020). You may be more original than you think: Predictable biases in self-assessment of originality. Acta Psychologica, 203, Article 103002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.103002pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2012s). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.pl
    dc.description.referencesSullivan, D.M., & Ford, C.M. (2010). The alignment of measures and constructs in organizational research: The case of testing measurement models of creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9147-8pl
    dc.description.referencesUnkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2013). The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior. Psychology Press.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume12pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage102pl
    dc.description.lastpage120pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6777-7103-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6258-289X-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2025, Vol. 12, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_12_1_2025_R_Puente-Díaz_J_Cavazos-Arroyo_Generating_More_Ideas_Makes_Me_Feel_Better.pdf318,62 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons