Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20172Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Namiotko, Urszula | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-24T08:00:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-24T08:00:30Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Polish Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 7 (77), 2025, pp. 99-110 | pl |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20172 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is currently one of the key frameworks supporting inclusive education, emphasising the need to design flexible learning environments and to reduce barriers that limit access to knowledge. At the same time, there is growing interest in forest education as a specific form of outdoor education grounded in direct contact with nature, experiential learning, and the strengthening of learners’ agency and autonomy. Despite clear conceptual overlaps between UDL and practices used in forest education, the relationships between these two approaches remain only partially explored in the literature. The aim of this article is to offer a conceptual analysis that identifies potential areas of integration between UDL principles and forest education practices. The paper discusses the theoretical foundations of UDL and the core assumptions of forest education, highlighting shared elements such as multisensory experience, learner agency, diversity of available forms of activity, flexibility of the learning environment, and the possibility of adapting activities to individual learner needs. On this basis, key components are identified that may inspire the design of accessible, engaging, and varied learning environments aligned with the principles of Universal Design for Learning. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | University of Białystok | pl |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | Universal Design for Learning (UDL) | pl |
| dc.subject | inclusive education | pl |
| dc.subject | forest education | pl |
| dc.subject | learning environment design | pl |
| dc.title | Universal Design for Learning in Forest Education: A Conceptual Analysis | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2025 Urszula Namiotko, published by University of Białystok | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/poljes-2025-0008 | - |
| dc.description.Email | u.namiotko@uwb.edu.pl | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Faculty of Education University of Bialystok Białystok, Poland | pl |
| dc.description.references | Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. | pl |
| dc.description.references | CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning (UDL) guidelines version 2.0. Author. | pl |
| dc.description.references | CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Author. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Capp, M.J. (2017). The effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791–807. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Catama, B.V. (2025). Universal Design for Learning in action: Exploring strategies, outcomes, and challenges in inclusive education. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education, 5(2). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Chamblin, M. (2017). Using the ADAPT strategy to facilitate the thinking process of creating universal design-based instructional adaptations and differentiation in lesson plans for diverse learners. Open Access Library Journal, 4, 1–17. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Cree, J., & McCree, M. (2012). A brief history of the roots of Forest School in the UK. Horizons, 60(Winter). Institute for Outdoor Learning. https://outdoor-learning-research.org/Portals/0/Research%20Documents/Horizons%20Archive/H60.History.of.FS.pt1.pdf | pl |
| dc.description.references | Dabaja, Z.F. (2022). The Forest School impact on children: Reviewing two decades of research. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 50(5). https://educartenatureza.uab.pt/wp-content/uploads/sites/36/2023/06/The-Forest-School-impact-on-children-reviewing-two-decades-of-research.pdf | pl |
| dc.description.references | Edyburn, D.L. (2010). Would you recognise Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Forest School Association. (2002). History of Forest School. https://forestschoolassociation.org/history-of-forest-school | pl |
| dc.description.references | Isaacs, S. (1929). The nursery years: The mind of the child from birth to six years. Routledge & Kegan Paul. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.221617 | pl |
| dc.description.references | Israel, M., Ribuffo, C., & Smith, S.J. (2014). Universal Design for Learning innovation configuration: Recommendations for preservice teacher preparation and inservice professional development. CEEDAR Center, University of Florida. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296486155 | pl |
| dc.description.references | King-Sears, M.E. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 69–80. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Knight, S. (2013). Forest School and outdoor learning in the early years. SAGE. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Leather, M.F. (2018). A critique of Forest School: Something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(2), 5–18. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Murray, R., & O’Brien, L. (2005). Such enthusiasm – a joy to see: An evaluation of Forest School in England. Forestry Commission. https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2022/02/forest-schoolenglandreport.pdf | pl |
| dc.description.references | Perkowska, M., & Bajkowski, T. (2022). Projektowanie uniwersalne w przestrzeni uniwersyteckiej – idee, możliwości, dobre praktyki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Rose, D.H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2657-3628 | - |
| dc.description.volume | 7 (77) | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 99 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 110 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Polish Journal of Educational Studies | pl |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-9015-3091 | - |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Artykuły naukowe (WNoE) Polish Journal of Educational Studies 2025, Vol. 7 (77) | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLJES_7_77_2025_U_Namiotko_Universal_Design_for_Learning_in_Forest_Education.pdf | 306,43 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
