REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20171
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorUnderwood, James-
dc.contributor.authorZaman, Sogol-
dc.contributor.authorTruong, Truc Thanh-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-24T07:09:36Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-24T07:09:36Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationPolish Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 7 (77), 2025, pp. 91-98pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20171-
dc.description.abstractThis article presents findings from an early-stage pilot study investigating how coaching can support students aged 16–18 in England. As part of a wider comparative project involving England and Canada, this first paper focuses on the English context, drawing on semi-structured interviews with two students at a sixth form college in the East Midlands region of the United Kingdom. The study examines how coaching influences learning strategies, motivation, confidence, and overall well-being during the critical two-year stage between the General Certificate in Secondary Education (GCSE) exams at age 16 and A-Level exams at age 18. Sixth form students face high-stakes assessments alongside increased autonomy and responsibility for their learning. Coaching, distinguished from traditional mentoring or tutoring by its emphasis on questioning, reflection, and goal-setting, offers a structured yet personalized approach to supporting academic and personal development. Findings from the pilot indicate that coaching positively impacted students’ attainment by fostering self-assessment, and practical study strategies, while also enhancing confidence, self-efficacy, and resilience. Participants highlighted coaching as a mechanism for stress management, workload planning, and coping with the pressures of study. Additionally, peer-led support emerged as a potentially effective model to strengthen engagement, belonging, and motivation. This study contributes to the growing evidence that coaching can enhance both academic outcomes and personal well-being, suggesting that embedding coaching within sixth form practice may foster a culture of reflective learning, empowerment, and sustained student success.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectacademic coachingpl
dc.subjectsixth formpl
dc.subjectstress managementpl
dc.subjectstudent voicepl
dc.titleA Report on a Pilot Study into Using Coaching to Support ‘Sixth Form’ Students (Aged 16 to 18) in Englandpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2025 James Underwood, Sogol Zaman, Truc Thanh Truong, published by University of Białystok.pl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/poljes-2025-0007-
dc.description.EmailJames Underwood: james.underwood@pace.cam.ac.ukpl
dc.description.EmailSogol Zaman: sogol.zaman@yrdsb.capl
dc.description.EmailTruc Thanh Truong: ttruong@gladesdayschool.compl
dc.description.AffiliationJames Underwood - Professional and Continuing Education, University of Cambridge, UKpl
dc.description.AffiliationSogol Zaman - York Region District School Board, Ontario, Canadapl
dc.description.AffiliationTruc Thanh Truong - Upper School ELA Teacher, Glades Day School, Florida, USApl
dc.description.referencesBandura, R.P. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.pl
dc.description.referencesBarkley, A. (2010). Academic coaching for enhanced learning, higher levels of student responsibility, and greater retention. NACTA Journal, 55(1), 76–81.pl
dc.description.referencesBester, G., & Kuyper, N. (2020). The influence of additional educational support on poverty-stricken adolescents’ resilience and academic performance. Africa Education Review, 17(3), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2019.1689149pl
dc.description.referencesBlatt, L., Schunn, C.D., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Rottman, B.M. (2020). Variation in which key motivational and academic resources relate to academic performance disparities across introductory college courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00253-0pl
dc.description.referencesBritish Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018pl
dc.description.referencesCampbell, M., & Gardner, S. (2005). A pilot study to assess the effects of life coaching with year 12 students. In M. Cavanagh, A.N. Grant, & T. Kemp (Eds.), Evidence based coaching: Volume 1 theory, research and practice from the behavioural sciences (pp. 159–170). Australian Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesHall, M.M., Worsham, R.E., & Reavis, G. (2021). The effects of offering proactive student-success coaching on community college students’ academic performance and persistence. Community College Review, 49(2), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552120982030pl
dc.description.referencesJerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L.A., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O.D. (2020). Posh but poor: The association between relative socio-economic status and children’s academic performance. Review of Income and Wealth, 67(2), 334–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12476pl
dc.description.referencesKuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., Whitt, E.J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college. Jossey-Bass Inc.pl
dc.description.referencesLaw, H., Ireland, S., & Hussain, Z. (2007). The psychology of coaching, mentoring and learning. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.pl
dc.description.referencesLawton, J. M., & Willard, E. (2015). Psychology for A-Level Year 1 and AS. Hodder Education.pl
dc.description.referencesLee, W.C., Hall, J.L., Godwin, A., Knight, D.B., & Verdín, D. (2021). Operationalizing and monitoring student support in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20431pl
dc.description.referencesOreopoulos, P., & Petronijevic, U. (2018). Student coaching: How far can technology go? The Journal of Human Resources, 53(2), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.53.2.1216-8439Rpl
dc.description.referencesOreopoulos, P., Petronijevic, U., Logel, C., & Beattie, G. (2018). Improving non-academic student outcomes using online and text-message coaching. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 171, 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.009pl
dc.description.referencesPassmore, J., & Brown, A. (2009). Coaching non-adult students for enhanced examination performance: A longitudinal study. An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 2(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521880902783124pl
dc.description.referencesRobinson, C., & Gahagan, J. (2010). Coaching students to academic success and engagement on campus. American College Personnel Association, 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20032pl
dc.description.referencesRodriguez, A., Navarro, A., Carrillo, M.J., & Isla, L. (2023). University coaching experience and academic performance. Education Sciences, 13(248), 3–248. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030248pl
dc.description.referencesSeidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.pl
dc.description.referencesTruong, V.Q., & Underwood, J. (2023). The stress coping mechanisms of Vietnamese students in gifted schools. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/113349486/The_Stress_Coping_Mechanisms_of_Vietnamese_Students_In_Gifted_Schoolspl
dc.description.referencesUnderwood, J. (2015). Travel, emotion and identity: An exploration into the experiences of students in post-16 education for whom studying in English means working in a foreign language and culture. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/11415511/Travel_emotion_and_identity_an_exploration_into_the_experiences_of_students_in_post_16_education_for_whom_studying_in_English_means_working_in_a_foreign_language_and_culturepl
dc.description.referencesWang, Q. (2012). Coaching for learning: Exploring coaching psychology in enquiry-based learning and development of learning power in secondary education. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 69, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.397pl
dc.description.referencesWhitmore, J. (2009). Coaching for performance. Nicholas Brealey.pl
dc.description.referencesYehuda, M.B. (2015). The route to success: Personal academic coaching program. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.242pl
dc.description.referencesZhang, F., Jiang, Y., Ming, H., Ren, Y., Wang, L., & Huang, S. (2020). Family socio-economic status and children’s academic achievement: The different roles of parental academic involvement and subjective social mobility. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12374pl
dc.identifier.eissn2657-3628-
dc.description.volume7 (77)pl
dc.description.firstpage91pl
dc.description.lastpage98pl
dc.identifier.citation2Polish Journal of Educational Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9351-2408-
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0000-2794-4253-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4187-9181-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Polish Journal of Educational Studies 2025, Vol. 7 (77)

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons