REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2024, Vol. 11, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20164
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorBonetto, Eric-
    dc.contributor.authorNaczaj, Dimitri-
    dc.contributor.authorArciszewski, Thomas-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-23T11:27:28Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-23T11:27:28Z-
    dc.date.issued2024-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 2024, pp. 88-99pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20164-
    dc.description.abstractWhy do individuals confronted with a specific situation act creatively or not? To answer this question, the psychology of creativity needs to rely on comprehensive behavioral models allowing researchers to better identify the determinants of creative behavior and to be able to efficiently foster this behavior. Behavioral sciences precisely developed behavioral models that allow us to understand and influence a wide variety of behaviors. The present contribution argues for the use of behavioral sciences models in creativity research, and describes three main functions for creativity research: (1) a heuristic function (supporting the development of scientific knowledge about goal-directed creative behavior), (2) an interventional function (supporting the elaboration of efficient behavioral interventions to foster creative behavior), and (3) a categorization function (providing a clearer view of the types of interventions designed to foster specific creative behavior and of the behavioral drivers used).pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjectCreativitypl
    dc.subjectCreative behaviorpl
    dc.subjectBehavioral sciencespl
    dc.titleYou Want to Foster Creative Behavior? Try Behavioral Sciences Modelspl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2024 Eric Bonetto, Dimitri Naczaj, Thomas Arciszewski, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2024-0006-
    dc.description.EmailEric Bonetto: bonetto.ericbw@gmail.compl
    dc.description.AffiliationEric Bonetto - PSYCLE, Aix-Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France; InCIAM, Aix-Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France; Bellegarde Scientific Consultingpl
    dc.description.AffiliationDimitri Naczaj - Bellegarde Scientific Consultingpl
    dc.description.AffiliationThomas Arciszewski - PSYCLE, Aix-Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France; InCIAM, Aix-Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, Francepl
    dc.description.referencesAdarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S.A. (2007). Creative innovation or crazy irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.013pl
    dc.description.referencesAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-Tpl
    dc.description.referencesArmitage, C.J. (1999). Different Perceptions of Control: Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Legal and Illegal Drug Use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2104_4pl
    dc.description.referencesBaumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D., & Funder, D.C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self- reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?. Perspectives on psychological science, 2(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.xpl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R.A., Karwowski, M., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2021). Intellectual risk taking: A moderating link between creative confidence and creative behavior? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000323pl
    dc.description.referencesBenedek, M. (2024). On the relationship between creative potential and creative achievement: Challenges and future directions. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102424pl
    dc.description.referencesBonetto, E., & Arciszewski, T. (2023). One “C” to Rule Them All: The Psychology of Creativity Needs to Refocus on Behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(3), 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.590pl
    dc.description.referencesBonetto, E., Guiller, T., & Adam-Trojan, J. (2023). A Lost Idea in Psychology: Observation as Starting Point for the Scientific Investigation of Human Behavior. Human Ethology, 38, 08–16. https://doi.org/10.22330/he/38/008-016pl
    dc.description.referencesBonetto, E., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.B., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2021). Creative individuals are social risk-takers: Relationships between creativity, social risk-taking and fear of negative evaluations. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 7(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0016pl
    dc.description.referencesCautilli, J. (2004). Toward a behavioral theory of “creativity”: A preliminary essay. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100138pl
    dc.description.referencesCheng, O.Y., Yam, C.L.Y., Cheung, N.S., Lee, P.L.P., Ngai, M.C., & Lin, C.-Y. (2019). Extended Theory of Planned Behavior on Eating and Physical Activity. American Journal of Health Behavior, 43(3), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.43.3.11pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2014). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 161–184). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7pl
    dc.description.referencesConner, T.S., & Silvia, P.J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022pl
    dc.description.referencesEpstein, R., & Laptosky, G. (1999). Behavioral approaches to creativity. In M. Runco & S.R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 175–183). Academic Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesForgeard, M.J.C., & Kaufman, J.C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000042pl
    dc.description.referencesGao, L., Wang, S., Li, J., & Li, H. (2017). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy saving behavior in workplaces. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.030pl
    dc.description.referencesHallsworth, M. (2023). A manifesto for applying behavioural science. Nat Hum Behav, 7, 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01555-3pl
    dc.description.referencesHu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J.C. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The journal of creative behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20pl
    dc.description.referencesJauk, E. (2019). A bio-psycho-behavioral model of creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.012pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 302–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941969.016pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Beghetto, R.A. (2019). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000190pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688pl
    dc.description.referencesKizilcec, R.F., Reich, J., Yeomans, M., Dann, C., Brunskill, E., Lopez, G., … & Tingley, D. (2020). Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26), 14900–14905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921417117pl
    dc.description.referencesKrusche, A., Wilde, L., Ghio, D., Morrissey, C., Froom, A., & Chick, D. (2022). Developing public transport messaging to provide crowding information during COVID-19: Application of the COM-B model and behaviour change wheel. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 13, 100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100564pl
    dc.description.referencesLihua, D. (2022). An Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior: An Empirical Study of Entrepreneurial Intention and Entrepreneurial Behavior in College Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 627818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.627818pl
    dc.description.referencesLiu, T., Li, P., Zhang, S.Z., & Liu, W. (2023). Using Daily creativity planning to promote creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.563pl
    dc.description.referencesMcDonagh, L.K., Saunders, J.M., Cassell, J., Curtis, T., Bastaki, H., Hartney, T., & Rait, G. (2018). Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0821-ypl
    dc.description.referencesMichie, S., Atkins, L., & West, R. (2014a). The behaviour change wheel. A guide to designing interventions. Silverback Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesMichie, S., Van Stralen, M.M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42pl
    dc.description.referencesMichie, S., West, R., Campbell, R., Brown, J., & Gainforth, H. (2014b). ABC of behaviour change theories. Silverback Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesMichael, L.H., Hou, S.T., & Fan, H.L. (2011). Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.xpl
    dc.description.referencesOsbaldiston, R., & Schott, J.P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and behavior, 44(2), 257–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673pl
    dc.description.referencesProchaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 19(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088437pl
    dc.description.referencesTesluk, P.E., Farr, J.L., & Klein, S.R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. The journal of creative behavior, 31(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00779.xpl
    dc.description.referencesVan Bavel, J.J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P.S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., … & Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature human behaviour, 4(5), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-zpl
    dc.description.referencesWest, R., Michie, S., Rubin, G.J., & Amlôt, R. (2020). Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Nature human behaviour, 4(5), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-0200887-9pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume11pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage88pl
    dc.description.lastpage99pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0824-1103-
    dc.identifier.orcidbrakorcid-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7524-8911-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2024, Vol. 11, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_11_1_2024_E_Bonetto_D_Naczaj_T_Arciszewski_You_Want_to_Foster_Creative_Behavior.pdf276,67 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons