REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20158
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorHeidari-Shahreza, Mohammad Ali-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-23T09:01:11Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-23T09:01:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 2024, pp. 18-35pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20158-
dc.description.abstractThis article opens a window on linguistic creativity through an in-depth discussion of language play. To this aim, language play is initially conceptualized from a socio-cognitive perspective. ‘Language play for fun’ and ‘language play for practice’ as two dominant approaches in the relevant literature are, then, touched upon. Afterward, the paper elucidates how language play, in its various manifestations, can inform and influence linguistic creativity. In this respect, a theoretical (linguistic) and a socio-pragmatic perspective are presented. In particular, the paper addresses the possibility of playing to ‘language’ outside the box (i.e., to go beyond the conventional systemic constraints of language). Highlight ing the ubiquity of language play, it also considers Wittgenstein’s notion of ‘language games’ (or Sprachspiele). Furthermore, the performative power of playful creativity to make and ‘unmake’ language in society is elaborated on. The article contends that language play may offer valuable insights to extend the borders of linguistic creativity. This argument is further developed under the purview of ‘complexity theory,’ ‘soft computing,’ and ‘computational linguistic creativity.’ Finally, the paper advocates an ‘integrated science’ approach to advance play-based research on linguistic creativity.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectLanguage playpl
dc.subjectLinguistic creativitypl
dc.subjectPlaypl
dc.subjectHumorpl
dc.subjectPlayful creativitypl
dc.subjectComputational linguisticspl
dc.titleWhen Language is Played: Looking into Linguistic Creativity through Language Playpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2024 Mohammad Ali Heidari-Shahreza, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2024-0002-
dc.description.Emailmaheidari.sh@gmail.compl
dc.description.AffiliationDepartment Of English, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iranpl
dc.description.referencesAlnajjar, K., & Toivonen, H. (2021). Computational generation of slogans. Natural Language Engineering, 27(5), 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324920000236pl
dc.description.referencesAlves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Xavier, C., Hoffman, G., & Paiva, A. (2021). Creativity landscapes: Systematic review spanning 70 years of creativity interventions for children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.514pl
dc.description.referencesAttardo, S. (2020). The linguistics of humor: An introduction. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesAustin, J.L. (1962/1975). How to do things with words (2nd Ed.). Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBakhtin, M. ([1935] 1981). The dialogic imagination. Trans. C. Emerson/M. Holquist. University of Texas Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBauman, R. (1986). Story, performance and event. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBell, N. (2012). Formulaic language, creativity, and language play in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 189–205.pl
dc.description.referencesBennett, M.Y. (2015). The cambridge introduction to theatre and literature of the absurd. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107284265pl
dc.description.referencesBergs, A. (2019). What, if anything, is linguistic creativity? Gestalt Theory, 41(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2019-0017pl
dc.description.referencesCarter, R. (2016). Language and creativity: The art of common talk (2nd Ed.). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesChakraverty, S., Sahoo, D.M., & Mahato, N.R. (2019). Concepts of soft computing: Fuzzy and ANN with programming. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7430-2pl
dc.description.referencesChomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.pl
dc.description.referencesChomsky, N. (2003). The reasons of state. Penguin.pl
dc.description.referencesClark, E.V. (2006). Creativity in language. In encyclopedia of language &linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B008-044854-2/04741-6pl
dc.description.referencesCrystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCook, G. (1997). Language play, language learning. ELT Journal, 51, 224–231.pl
dc.description.referencesCook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesDavies, C.E. (2003). How English-learners joke with native speakers: an interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1361–1385.pl
dc.description.referencesDeneire, M. (1995). Humor and foreign language teaching. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 8, 285–298.pl
dc.description.referencesDeumert, A. (2014). Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. Edinburgh University Presspl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2017). A rhetorical analysis of humor styles and techniques used in Persian stand-up comedy. Humor, 30(4), 359–381.pl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2018a). A proficiency-based analysis of EFL learners’ humorous language play. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12212pl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2018b). A cross-sectional analysis of teacher-initiated verbal humor and ludic language play in an English as a foreign language (EFL) context. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1430474pl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2018c). Focus on form and fun: EFL learners’ playful language-related episodes (PLREs). TESL-EJ Journal, 22(2), 1–15.pl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2021). When a nation breathes through humor: A sociolinguistic perspective on Iranian jokes about America. Society, 58(4), 301–307.pl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2023a). Humor as antihistamine in the discourse of Persian stand-up comedy: Female stand-up comedians in Iran. In R. Bhargava & R. Chilana (Eds.), Punching up in Stand-up Comedy: Speaking truth to power (pp. 131–148). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2023b). Humor beyond human; Eco-humor as a pedagogical toolkit for environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 39(4), 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2023.8pl
dc.description.referencesHeidari-Shahreza, M.A. (2024). Language learning playware: A Playful learning approach to ELT materials development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2327486pl
dc.description.referencesHelfand, M., Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2016). The Four-C Model of Creativity: Culture and Context. In V.P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research, Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture (pp. 15–36). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_2pl
dc.description.referencesHolmes, R.M., Gardner, B., Kohm, K., Bant, C., Ciminello, A., Moedt, K., & Romeo, L. (2019). The relationship between young children’slanguage abilities, creativity, play, and storytelling. Early Child Development and Care, 189(2), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1314274pl
dc.description.referencesJakobson, J. (1960). Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In T.A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.pl
dc.description.referencesJones, R.H. (Ed.). (2016a). Routledge handbook of language and creativity. Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesJones, R.H. (2016b). Creativity and language. In R.H. Jones & J. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 16–31). Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., & Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKegl, J.A. (2020). Unique features of human language. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0393pl
dc.description.referencesKennedy, R.S. (1980). Dreams in the mirror: A biography of E. E. Cummings. Liveright.pl
dc.description.referencesLarsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/Complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141.pl
dc.description.referencesLarsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMaley, A., & Kiss, T. (2018). Creativity and English language teaching: From inspiration to implementation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46729-4pl
dc.description.referencesMartin, R.A., & Ford, T.E. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach (2nd Ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMartins, P., Pereira, F.C., & Cardoso, A.F. (2019). The nuts and bolts of conceptual blending: Multidomain concept creation with Divago. In T. Veale & F.A. Cardoso (Eds.), Computational creativity: The philosophy and engineering of autonomously creative systems (pp. 91–119). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-319-43610-4_5pl
dc.description.referencesPellicer, L.F.A.O., Ferreira, T.M., & Costa, A.H.R. (2023). Data augmentation techniques in natural language processing. Applied Soft Computing, 132, 109803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109803pl
dc.description.referencesPereyra, P. (2012). Fundamentals of quantum physics: Textbook for students of science and engineering. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29378-8pl
dc.description.referencesProyer, R.T., Tandler, N., & Brauer, K. (2019). Playfulness and creativity: a selective review. In S.R. Luria, J. Baer, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity and Humor (pp. 43–60). Elsevier.pl
dc.description.referencesRezaei, N. (2021). Integrated Science: Science without borders. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3030-65273-9pl
dc.description.referencesRitchie, G. (2001). Current directions in computational humor. Artificial Intelligence Review, 16, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011610210506pl
dc.description.referencesRitchie, G. (2007). Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines, 17(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-007-9066-2pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2018). The nature of human creativity. Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesStorch, A. (2018). At the fringes of language: On the semiotics of noise. Language Sciences, 65, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.03.008pl
dc.description.referencesSwann, J., & Deumert, A. (2018). Sociolinguistics and language creativity. Language Sciences, 65, 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.06.002pl
dc.description.referencesThiétart, R.A., & Forgues, B. (1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635237pl
dc.description.referencesThurner, S., Hanel, R., & Klimek P. (2018). An introduction to the theory of complex systems. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesVeale, T., & Cardoso, F. (2019). Computational Creativity: The philosophy and engineering of autonomously creative systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43610-4pl
dc.description.referencesVygotsky, L.S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesWaring, H.Z. (2013). Doing being playful in the second language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 191-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams047.pl
dc.description.referencesWittgenstein, L. (1953). The philosophical investigations. Blackwell.pl
dc.description.referencesWray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesZiv, A. (2010). The social function of humor in interpersonal relationships. Society, 47, 11–18.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
dc.description.volume11pl
dc.description.issue1pl
dc.description.firstpage18pl
dc.description.lastpage35pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1986-5277-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2024, Vol. 11, Issue 1

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons