REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2023, Vol. 10, Issue 1-2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20149
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorFurnham, Adrian-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-22T08:41:24Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-22T08:41:24Z-
    dc.date.issued2023-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 10, Issue 1-2, 2023, pp. 110-118pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20149-
    dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to examine demographic, ideological, and personality trait correlates of self-assessed creativity. A large group (N = 1,299) of adults estimated their creativity score on a 100-point scale. This rating was related to participants’ demographics (sex, age, education), ideology (religious and political beliefs), self-confidence, and six personality traits. The regression indicated that those who thought of themselves as more creative were more optimistic, higher on trait Curious (Open), but lower on trait Adjustment (low Neuroticism) and trait Competitive (low Agreeableness), and had higher selfesteem. The status of self-assessed/estimated creativity is discussed alongside limitations and recommendations for future research.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjectSelf-estimatedpl
    dc.subjectdemographypl
    dc.subjectideologypl
    dc.subjectself-confidencepl
    dc.titleCorrelates of Self-Assessed Creativitypl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2023 Adrian Furnham, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2023-0008-
    dc.description.Emailadrian@adrianfurnham.compl
    dc.description.AffiliationNorwegian Business School (BI), Nydalveien, Olso, Norwaypl
    dc.description.referencesAckerman, P., & Wolman, S. (2007). Determinants and validity of self-estimates of ability and self-concept measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(2), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.2.57pl
    dc.description.referencesAllen, M.S., Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science: A call to action [Editorial]. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699pl
    dc.description.referencesAlencar, E.M.L.S., Fleith, D.S., & Pereira, N. (2017). Creativity in Higher Education: Challenges and Facilitating Factors. Temas Em Psicologia, 25(2), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2017.2-09pl
    dc.description.referencesCuppello, S., Treglown, L., & Furnham, A. (2023a). Personality and Management Level: Traits that get you to the top. Personality and Individual Difference, 206, 112108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112108pl
    dc.description.referencesCuppello, S., Treglown, L., & Furnham, A. (2023b). Intelligence, Personality and Tolerance of Ambiguity. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060102pl
    dc.description.referencesFreund, P.A., & Kasten, N. (2012). How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026556pl
    dc.description.referencesFurnham, A. (2016). Whether You Think You Can, or You Think You Can’t – You’re Right. Differences and Consequences of Beliefs about Your Ability. In R. Sternberg, S. Fiske, & D. Foss (Eds.), Scientists Making a Difference (pp. 297-230). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316422250.065pl
    dc.description.referencesFurnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Estimating one’s own personality and intelligence scores. British Journal of Psychology, 95(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712604773952395pl
    dc.description.referencesFurnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Moutafi, J. (2005). Personality and Intelligence: Gender, the Big-Five, Self-Estimated and Psychometric Intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00296.xpl
    dc.description.referencesFurnham, A. (2020). Personality and Creativity at Work. In M. Mumford, & M. Todd (Eds.), Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Personality and Creativity (1st ed., pp. 89–103). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315192598pl
    dc.description.referencesFurnham, A., & Robinson, C. (2023). Correlates of Self-Assessed Optimism. Current Directions in the Behavioural Science, 4, 100089.pl
    dc.description.referencesFurnham, A., & Treglown, L. (2018). High potential personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.025pl
    dc.description.referencesFurnham, A., & Treglown, L. (2021). The Dark Side of High-Fliers: The Dark Triad, High-Flier Traits, Engagement, and Subjective Success. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 647676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647676pl
    dc.description.referencesGignac, G.E. (2021). People who consider themselves smart do not consider themselves interpersonally challenged: Convergent validity evidence for subjectively measured IQ and EI. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110664pl
    dc.description.referencesHofer, G., Mraulak, V., Grinschgl, S., & Neubauer, A.C. (2022). Less Intelligent and Unaware? Accuracy and Dunning–Kruger Effects for Self-Estimates of Different Aspects of Intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10010010pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C. (2019). Self-assessments of creativity: Not ideal, but better than you think. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 187–192. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/aca0000217pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C. (2012). Self-estimates of general, crystallised, and fluid intelligences in an ethnically diverse population. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 118–122.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C. (2019). Self-assessments of creativity: Not ideal, but better than you think. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 187–192. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/aca0000217pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure I’m creative- But not in mathematics! Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.2190/26HQ-VHE8-GTLN-BJJMpl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., & Russell, C.M. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911-428196pl
    dc.description.referencesMacRae, I., & Furnham, A. (2020). A Psychometric Analysis of the High Potential Trait Inventory (HPTI). Psychology, 11(8), 1125–1140. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2020.118074pl
    dc.description.referencesNeubauer, A.C., & Hofer, G. (2020). Self-estimates of abilities are a better reflection of individuals’ personality traits than of their abilities and are also strong predictors of professional interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 109850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109850pl
    dc.description.referencesNeubauer, A.C., Pribil, A., Wallner, A., & Hofer, G. (2018). The self–other knowledge asymmetry in cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence, and creativity. Heliyon, 4(12), e01061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e0106pl
    dc.description.referencesNeto, F., Pinto, M.C., Mullet, E., & Furnham, A. (2017). Estimates of reversal multiple intelligences for self and others: Sex and cross-cultural comparisons. International Journal of Psychology, 52(6), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12241pl
    dc.description.referencesPark, N.K., Chun, M.Y., & Lee, J. (2016). Revisiting Individual Creativity Assessment: Triangulation in Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1125259pl
    dc.description.referencesPaulhus, D.L., Lysy, D.C., & Yik, M.S.M. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests? Journal of Personality, 66(4), 525–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00023pl
    dc.description.referencesSzymanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta-analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.001pl
    dc.description.referencesTeodorescu, A., Furnham, A., & MacRae, I. (2017). Trait correlates of success at work. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12158pl
    dc.description.referencesTreglown, L., & Furnham, A. (2020). Birds of a feather work together: The role of emotional intelligence and cognitive ability in workplace interaction and advice networks. Personality and Individual Differences, 158, 109833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109833pl
    dc.description.referencesvon Stumm, S. (2014). Intelligence, gender, and assessment method affect the accuracy of self-estimated intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 105(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12031pl
    dc.description.referencesZell, E., & Zlatan, K. (2014). Do people have insight into their abilities? A meta-synthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 111–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613518075pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume10pl
    dc.description.issue1-2pl
    dc.description.firstpage110pl
    dc.description.lastpage118pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7545-8532-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2023, Vol. 10, Issue 1-2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_10_1-2_2023_A_Furnham_Correlates_of_Self-Assessed_Creativity.pdf233,12 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons