REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2023, Vol. 10, Issue 1-2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20141
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorBoisadan, Andréa-
    dc.contributor.authorBuisine, Stéphanie-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-21T12:15:12Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-21T12:15:12Z-
    dc.date.issued2023-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 10, Issue 1-2, 2023, pp. 50-63pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20141-
    dc.description.abstractLead users are invaluable resources to generate usercentric radical innovation, but they remain difficult to detect and recruit in the general population. Lead userness, which draws both on the ability to identify unstated customer needs and find creative solutions to those needs, has been conceptualized as domain-dependent: this means that a lead user may generate innovation only in a specific domain for which they are an expert. In the present study, we aim to better understand the extent to which lead userness is a domain-dependent state (as elaborated in the literature) or a domain-independent trait. Following a questionnaire survey with 126 participants, we managed to reliably assess the empathetic side of lead userness (ability to identify needs) and showed that it was related both to domain-dependent characteristics (competences) and domain-independent trait (emotional intelligence). These results open up new avenues for implementing the lead user method in innovation projects.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
    dc.subjectlead userpl
    dc.subjectextraordinary users modelpl
    dc.subjectinnovator’s dilemmapl
    dc.subjectneed seeker strategypl
    dc.subjectself-determination theorypl
    dc.subjectempathypl
    dc.titleWho are Lead users?pl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2023 Andréa Boisadan, Stéphanie Buisine, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2023-0004-
    dc.description.EmailAndréa Boisadan: aboisadan@cesi.frpl
    dc.description.EmailStéphanie Buisine: sbuisine@cesi.frpl
    dc.description.AffiliationAndréa Boisadan - CESI, LINEACT, Nanterre, Francepl
    dc.description.AffiliationStéphanie Buisine - CESI, LINEACT, Nanterre, Francepl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. (1985). Motivation and Creativity: effects of Motivational orientation on Creative Writers. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393pl
    dc.description.referencesBaer, J. (2015). The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480pl
    dc.description.referencesBarOn, R., & Parker, J.D.A. (2000). The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application At Home, School, and in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Company.pl
    dc.description.referencesBarron, F. (1955). The disposition towards originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073pl
    dc.description.referencesBaruch, O.K. (2017). Big Five Personnality and Creativity: The Moderating Effect of Motivational Goal orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.183pl
    dc.description.referencesBoisadan, A., Buisine, S., & Moreau, P. (2021). Towards the design of a quick and universal questionnaire to assess the intuitiveness of products. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22, 753–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1876177pl
    dc.description.referencesBoisadan, A., Buisine, S., Moreau, P., & Boumenir, Y. (2020). Designing universal visuotactile pictograms for orientation maps. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 10, 31–69. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v10i1.219pl
    dc.description.referencesBuisine, S., Boisadan, A., Richir, S. (2018). L’innovation radicale par la méthode de l’utilisateur extraordinaire. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 24, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2017.11.001pl
    dc.description.referencesBuisine, S., Taton, A., & Boisadan, A. (2021). Need-seeking: Creating, discovering or recovering needs? In N.L. Black et al. (Eds), Proceedings of IEA 2021 Triennal Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, LNNS 219, p. 624–630.pl
    dc.description.referencesChristensen, C. (1997 first edition – 2016 last edition). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business Review Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesClark, R., & DeYoung, C. (2014). Creativity and the aspects of neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S54. https://d oi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.224pl
    dc.description.referencesConner, T.S., & Silvia, P.J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022pl
    dc.description.referencesCook, D.A, & Artino, A.R. (2016). Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074pl
    dc.description.referencesCosta, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesDeci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesEisenberg, I. (2011). Lead user Research for Breakthrough Innovation. Research-Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2011.11657673pl
    dc.description.referencesFaullant, R., Schwarz, E.J., Krajger, I., & Breitenecker, R.J. (2012). Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Lead Userness: The Search for Individual Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00626.xpl
    dc.description.referencesFeist, G.J. (1998). A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5pl
    dc.description.referencesFranke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead-User Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.xpl
    dc.description.referencesFürst, G., Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2023). Créativité et personnalité. In N. Bonnardel, F. Girandola, E. Bonetto & T. Lubart (Eds.), La créativité en situations (pp. 86–100). Dunod.pl
    dc.description.referencesFürst, G., & Lubart, T. (2017). An integrative approach to the creative personality: Beyond the big five paradigm. In G.J. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 140–164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.009pl
    dc.description.referencesGeher, G., Bettancourt, K., & Jewell, O. (2017). The Link between Emotional Intelligence and Creativity? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617710029pl
    dc.description.referencesGeorge, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513pl
    dc.description.referencesGoldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216pl
    dc.description.referencesIoannidou, F., & Konstantikaki, V. (2008). Empathy and emotional intelligence: What it is really about? International Journal of Caring Sciences, 1(3), 118–123.pl
    dc.description.referencesIvcevic, Z., & Brackett, M.A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0039826pl
    dc.description.referencesJaruzelski, B., Staack, V., et Goehle, B. (2014). Proven paths to innovation success. Strategy Business, 77, 2–16.pl
    dc.description.referencesJohn, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.pl
    dc.description.referencesJohnson, J.A. (2017). Big-Five model. In V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1212-1pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond bid and little: the four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688pl
    dc.description.referencesKoning, C.C. (2016). Identifying lead users through a personality characteristics survey. (Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente).pl
    dc.description.referencesKratzer, J., Lettl, C., Franke, N., et Gloor, P.A. (2016). The Social Network Position of Lead Users. Journal of product innovation management, 33(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12291pl
    dc.description.referencesKreuzig, H.W. (1981). Über den Zugang zu komplexen Problemlösen mittels prozeßorientierter kognitiver Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 294–308.pl
    dc.description.referencesLehnen, J., & Herstatt, C. (2016). Thirty years lead user research – an empirical study of its implementation level in business practice. https://oui2016.exordo.com/files/papers/130/initial_draft/Thirty_years_lead_user_research_Lehnen_Herstatt.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesLilien, G., Morrison, P.D., Saerls, K., Sonnack, M., et von Hippel, E. (2001). Performance Assessment of the Lead User idea Generation Process for New Product Development. ISBM Report 4-2001.pl
    dc.description.referencesLubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Armand Colin.pl
    dc.description.referencesLubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité, 2nd ed. Armand Colin.pl
    dc.description.referencesLüthje, C. (2000). Kundenorientierung im Innovationsprozess. Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden.pl
    dc.description.referencesMartin, A., Agnoletti, M.F., & Brangier, E. (2021). Ordinary users, precursory users and experts in the anticipation of future needs: Evaluation of their contribution in the elaboration of new needs in energy for housing. Applied Ergonomics, 94(3), 103394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103394pl
    dc.description.referencesMorrison, P.D., Roberts, J.H., & Midgley, D.F. (2004). The Nature of Lead Users and Measurement of Leading Edge Status. Research Policy, 33, 351–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.007pl
    dc.description.referencesPajo, S., Verhaegen, P-A., Vandevenne, D., & Duflou, J.R. (2015). Fast Lead User Identification Framework. Procedia Engineering, 131, 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.434pl
    dc.description.referencesPuryear, J.S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A.N. (2017). Relating personality and creativity: Considering what and how we measure. Journal of Creative Behavior.pl
    dc.description.referencesRogers, E.M (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesRogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092pl
    dc.description.referencesRyan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020pl
    dc.description.referencesRyan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.55.1.68pl
    dc.description.referencesSalovey, P., & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination. Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDGpl
    dc.description.referencesSchreier, M., & Prügl, R.J. (2008) Extending Lead-User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Lead Userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 331–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.xpl
    dc.description.referencesSchreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prügl, R. (2007. Lead Users and the Adoption and Diffusion of New Products: Insights from Two Extreme Sports Communities. Marketing Letters, 18, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11002-006-9009-3pl
    dc.description.referencesSchutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M., Hall, L.E., Haggerty, D.J., Cooper, J.T., Golden, C.J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.pl
    dc.description.referencesSchweizer, T.S. (2006). The Psychology of Novelty-Seeking, Creativity and Innovation: Neurocognitive Aspects Within a Work-Psychological Perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172.pl
    dc.description.referencesSoukhoroukova, A., Spann, M., & et Skiera, B. (2012). Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 100–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00881.xpl
    dc.description.referencesSteele, L., McIntosh, T., & Higgs, C. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and creativity: Opening up a black box. In M. D. Mumford, & S. Hemlin (Eds.), Hanbook of research and leadership (pp. 100–130). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715465pl
    dc.description.referencesStory, M., Mueller, J., & Mace, M. (1998). Designing for People of all Ages and Abilities. North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design.pl
    dc.description.referencesvon Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesvon Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesvon Hippel, E.,Thomke,S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume10pl
    dc.description.issue1-2pl
    dc.description.firstpage50pl
    dc.description.lastpage63pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6674-1894-
    dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1389-570X-
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2023, Vol. 10, Issue 1-2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_10_1-2_2023_A_Boisadan_S_Buisine_Who_are_Lead_users.pdf247,11 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons