Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20114Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Allagui, Besma | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-18T10:24:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-18T10:24:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2022, pp. 108-129 | pl |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20114 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Creativity has long been central in multimodal writing. Unlike traditional writing, which uses text alone, multimodal writing relies on the use of a combination of modes to convey meaning such as text, speech, images, audio, gesture, and space. Scholars of multimodal writing stressed that using multiple modes allows for greater creativity and newness. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether creativity is so straightforward in students’ multimodal writing. Students may resist producing new types of writing. Their creativity outcome is dependent upon their preferences and their goals in the writing assignment. This article examines students’ choices when given the freedom to compose in any mode and their perceptions of their multimodal writing experience in comparison with traditional essay writing. Drawing on data from students’ multimodal products, surveys, and interviews we show how students simply used available resources in their multimodal composing and how creativity was negotiated. Although they identified several affordances for multimodal writing and described it as more interesting than conventional essay writing, they seemed to resist incorporating a variety of semiotic resources into their projects because their goal was to showcase their writing skills. We argue that developing explicit knowledge about various modes helps improve students’ understanding of multimodal writing as creative design. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | University of Białystok | pl |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | creativity | pl |
| dc.subject | choices | pl |
| dc.subject | mode | pl |
| dc.subject | multimodal writing | pl |
| dc.subject | perceptions | pl |
| dc.title | Facilitating Creativity through Multimodal Writing: An Examination of Students’ Choices and Perceptions | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2022 Besma Allagui, published by University of Białystok | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/ctra-2022-0006 | - |
| dc.description.Email | besma.allagui@yahoo.fr | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates | pl |
| dc.description.references | Amabile, T.M., & Gitomer, J. (1984). Children’s artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 209–215. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Alexander, K.P., Powell, B., & Green, S.C. (2011). Understanding modal affordances: Student perceptions of potentials and limitations in multimodal composition. Basic Writing eJournal, 10(11.1). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Aycock, J., Wright, H., Hildebrandt, J., Kenny, D., Lefebvre, N., Lin, M., ... & Yuen, A. (2019, May). Adapting the” Unessay” for Use in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (pp. 1–6). | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bereczki, E.O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: a multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100791. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Burnard, P. (2006). Reflecting on the creativity agenda in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 313–318. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Bohannon, J.L. (2015). Not a stitch out of place: Assessing students’ attitudes towards multimodal composition. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 8(2), 33. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Chen, C.W.Y. (2021). Composing print essays versus composing across modes: students’ multimodal choices and overall preferences. Literacy, 55(1), 25–38. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Ducate, L.C., Anderson, L.L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495–524. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Greenberg, E. (1992). Creativity, autonomy, and evaluation of creative work: Artistic workers in organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 26(2), 75–80. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hafner, C.A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL quarterly, 48(4), 655–685. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hafner, C.A. (2015). Remix culture and English language teaching: The expression of learner voice in digital multimodal compositions. Tesol Quarterly, 49(3), 486–509. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hafner, C.A. (2018). Visual design and multimodal composing. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1–7. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hafner, C.A. (2020). Digital Multimodal Composing: How to Address Multimodal Communication Forms in ELT. English Teaching, 75(3), 133–146. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hellmich, E., Castek, J., Smith, B.E., Floyd, R., & Wen, W. (2021). Student perspectives on multimodal composing in the L2 classroom: tensions with audience, media, learning and sharing. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 20(2), 210–226. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). We teach who we are: Creativity in the lives and practices of accomplished teachers. Teachers College Record, 117(7), 1–46. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Howell, E., Reinking, D., & Kaminski, R. (2015). Writing as creative design: Constructing multimodal arguments in a multiliteracies framework. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 16(1), 2–36. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hull, G.A., & Nelson, M.E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written communication, 22(2), 224–261. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hundley, M., & Holbrook, T. (2013). Set in stone or set in motion?: Multimodal and digital writing with preservice English teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6), 500-509. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Jakopak, R.P., Monteith K.L. & Merkle B.G. (2019). Writing Science. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 100(4), 1-5. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Jewitt, C., & Kress, G.R. (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Lang. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality, literacy and school English. In The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 366–377). London: Routledge. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Jones, L.A. (2010). Podcasting and performativity: Multimodal invention in an advanced writing class. Composition Studies, 38(2), 75–91. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Jiang, L. (2018). Digital multimodal composing and investment change in learners’ writing in English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 60–72. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kim, Y., & Belcher, D. (2020) Multimodal Composing and Traditional Essays: Linguistic Performance and Learner Perceptions. RELC Journal, 51(1), 86–100. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kim, Y., & Kang, S. (2020). Writing to Make Meaning through Collaborative Multimodal Composing among Korean EFL Learners: Writing Processes, Writing Quality and Student Perception. Computers and Composition, 58, 102609. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Cappelen. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Lee, V.J., Meloche, A., Grant, A., Neuman, D., & Tecce DeCarlo, M.J. (2019). “My Thoughts on Gun Violence”: An Urban Adolescent’s Display of Agency and Multimodal Literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(2), 157–168. | pl |
| dc.description.references | O’Donnell, D.P., Bay, J.L., Dering, E., Gal, M., Grandfield, V., Hobma, H., & Singh, G. (2016). The third academic freedom. Light on Teaching, 4–6. | pl |
| dc.description.references | O’Hara, L.A., & Sternberg, R.J. (2001). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 197–210. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Ranker, J. (2015). Redesigning the everyday: Recognizing creativity in student writing and multimodal composing. Language Arts, 92(5), 359. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Shin, D.S., & Cimasko, T. (2008). Multimodal composition in a college ESL class: New tools, traditional norms. Computers and composition, 25(4), 376–395. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Smith, B.E., Amgott, N., & Malova, I. (2021). “It Made Me Think in a Different Way”: Bilingual Students’ Perspectives on Multimodal Composing in the English Language Arts Classroom. TESOL Quarterly | pl |
| dc.description.references | Smith, B.E., Pacheco, M.B., & Khorosheva, M. (2020). Emergent bilingual students and digital multimodal composition: a systematic review of research in secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3–15. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sullivan, P. (2015). The UnEssay: Making room for creativity in the composition classroom. College Composition and Communication, 6–34. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Takayoshi, P., & Selfe, C.L. (2007). Thinking about multimodality. Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers, 1–12. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Vasudevan, L., Schultz, K., & Bateman, J. (2010). Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring literate identities through multimodal storytelling. Written communication, 27(4), 442–468. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Van Broekhoven, K., Belfi, B., Hocking, I., & van der Velden, R. (2020). Fostering university students’ idea generation and idea evaluation skills with a cognitive-based creativity training. Creativity, 7(2), 284–308. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Yang, Y.F.D. (2012). Multimodal composing in digital storytelling. Computers and Composition, 29(3), 221-238. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Yeh, H.C. (2018). Exploring the perceived benefits of the process of multimodal video making in developing multiliteracies. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 28–37. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Walsh, C.S. (2007). Creativity as capital in the literacy classroom: Youth as multimodal designers. Literacy, 41(2), 79–85. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Williams, R., Runco, M.A., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 385–394. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Zhang, Y., & O’Halloran, K.L. (2019). Empowering the point: Pains and gains of a writer’s traversals between print-based writing and multimodal composing. Linguistics and Education, 51, 1–11. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Zhao, S., Djonov, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: a multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. Text & Talk, 34(3), 349–375. | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2354-0036 | - |
| dc.description.volume | 9 | pl |
| dc.description.issue | 1 | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 108 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 129 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications | pl |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2022, Vol. 9, Issue 1 | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creativity_9_1_2022_B_Allagui_Facilitating_Creativity_through_Multimodal_Writing.pdf | 2,21 MB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
