REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2022, Vol. 9, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20111
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorBarai, Bikash-
    dc.contributor.authorKumar Saha, Rajesh-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-18T09:25:24Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-18T09:25:24Z-
    dc.date.issued2022-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2022, pp. 51-68pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20111-
    dc.description.abstractThe study was conducted on science learners at high school- and college-level to explore the interrelation of various factors from social environment, cognitive, and non-cognitive resources affecting their creative potential. A hierarchical regression method was used to determine how well positive behavior of parents, supportive behavior of friend groups, grit, motivation in science, and legislative thinking style could predict the creative potential of the science learners. The results revealed that supportive friend group behavior, consistency of interest (a sub-factor of grit), and legislative thinking style can predict the creative potential of science learners. Group variance explained by them was at over 53%. Legislative thinking style turned out to be the most dominant predictor, with 63% of unique variance explained by it. Positive friend group behavior came second, with 9% unique variance explained to the residual. Finally, consistency of interest could explain 12% of unique variance but with negative sign, implying it was not a component of the creative potential of science learners.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectcreative potentialpl
    dc.subjectgritpl
    dc.subjectmotivationpl
    dc.subjectenvironmentpl
    dc.titlePredictive Power of Social Environment, Grit, and Motivation for Creative Potential of Science Learnerspl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2022 Bikash Barai, Rajesh Kumar Saha, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2022-0003-
    dc.description.EmailBikash Barai: baraibikashedu@gmail.compl
    dc.description.AffiliationBikash Barai - Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal, Indiapl
    dc.description.AffiliationRajesh Kumar Saha - Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal, Indiapl
    dc.description.referencesAbuhassàn, A., & Bates, T. (2015). Grit: Distinguishing effortful persistence from conscientiousness. Journal Of Individual Differences, 36(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000175pl
    dc.description.referencesAlexopoulos, A., Paolucci, P., Sotiriou, S., Bogner, F., Dorigo, T., & Fedi, M. et al. (2021). The colours of the Higgs boson: a study in creativity and science motivation among high-school students in Italy. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00169-4pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1990). Within you, without you: Towards a social psychology of creativity and beyond. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories ofcreativity (pp. 61–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M., & Fisher, C.M. (2009). Stimulate creativity by fueling passion. In E.A. Locke (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd Ed.) (pp. 481–498). London: Wiley-Blackwellpl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M., Goldfarb, P., &Brackfield, S.C. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 6–21.pl
    dc.description.referencesBala, T. (2015). A comparative study of creativity of students in relation to their home environment. International Journal Of Advanced Research In Management And Social Sciences, 4(4), 189–197.pl
    dc.description.referencesBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.pl
    dc.description.referencesBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Choice Reviews Online, 35(03), 239. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1826pl
    dc.description.referencesBandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.pl
    dc.description.referencesBandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S.I. Donaldson, D.E. Berger & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53-70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.pl
    dc.description.referencesBarai, B., &Saha, R. (2021). Social Environment and Scientific Creative Potential: Understanding the Mediating Variables Within. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community, 11(1 & 2), 120–139.pl
    dc.description.referencesBaer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.pl
    dc.description.referencesBerry, W., & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple Regression in Practice (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). SAGE Publications.pl
    dc.description.referencesChen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 55(9), 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21450pl
    dc.description.referencesCropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554351pl
    dc.description.referencesCraft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M.A. Runco & R.S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M, (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R.J. Stemberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (2015). The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer Netherlands.pl
    dc.description.referencesDavis, C., Kaufman, J., & Mcclure, F. (2011). Non-Cognitive Constructs and Self-Reported Creativity by Domain. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01426.xpl
    dc.description.referencesDay, Ch. (2004). A Passion for Teaching. London: Routledge.pl
    dc.description.referencesDomino, G. (1979). Creativity and the Home Environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23(4), 818–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627902300414pl
    dc.description.referencesDuckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087pl
    dc.description.referencesDuckworth, A., & Quinn, P. (2009). Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S). Journal Of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. doi: 10.1080/00223890802634290pl
    dc.description.referencesDunn, L.L.S. (2004). Cognitive playfulness, innovativeness, and belief of essentialness: Characteristics of educators who have the ability to make enduring changes in the integration of technology into the classroom environment. University of North Texas, Texas, unpublisheddoctoral dissertation.pl
    dc.description.referencesFredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.pl
    dc.description.referencesFeist, G.J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.pl
    dc.description.referencesFrijda, N.H., Mesquita, B., Sonnemans, J., & Van Goozen, S. (1991). The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments and passions. In K.T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (pp. 187–225). New York: Wiley.pl
    dc.description.referencesGarriott, P., Flores, L., Prabhakar, B., Mazzotta, E., Liskov, A., & Shapiro, J. (2013). Parental Support and Underrepresented Students’ Math/Science Interests. Journal Of Career Assessment, 22(4), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072713514933pl
    dc.description.referencesGlynn, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267pl
    dc.description.referencesGlynn, S.M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire ii: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of research in science teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.pl
    dc.description.referencesGrohman, M.G., Ivcevic, Z., Silvia, P., & Kaufman, S.B. (2017). The Role of Passion and Persistence in Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000121pl
    dc.description.referencesGuilford, J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.pl
    dc.description.referencesGuilford, J.P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp.pl
    dc.description.referencesHair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.pl
    dc.description.referencesHaller, C.S., & Courvoisier, D.S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017084pl
    dc.description.referencesHaase, J., Hoff, E., Hanel, P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436pl
    dc.description.referencesHennessey, B.A. (1989). The effect of extrinsic constraint on children’s creativity when using a computer. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 151–168.pl
    dc.description.referencesHennessey, B.A., & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.pl
    dc.description.referencesHu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal Of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912pl
    dc.description.referencesHu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., et al. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarademir, E. (2016). Investigation the scientific creativity of gifted students through project-based activities. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(2), 416–427.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C. (2003). Critical thinking, creativity, and culture: An introduction. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22(3), 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews200322313pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
    dc.description.referencesKunat, B. (2017). „Dzielenie się czasem wolnym z uczniem” czyli o pracy nauczycieli z pasją. [„Sharing a free time with a pupil” a Word on the work of teachers with passion]. In E. Dubas, A. Gutowska (Eds.), Time and Places in a Biography. Educational Aspects. [Czas i miejsca w biografii. Aspekty edukacyjne]. (pp. 155–165), Łódź: UŁ.pl
    dc.description.referencesKunat, B. (2018). Passion and Creativity – Together or Separately?. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 5(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0004pl
    dc.description.referencesLawson, A.E., Banks, D.L., &Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 706–724.pl
    dc.description.referencesMednick, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.pl
    dc.description.referencesMeeker, M. (1982). Test of creative thinking. Vida, OR: SOI Systems.pl
    dc.description.referencesMehrinejad, S., Rajabimoghadam, S., & Tarsafi, M. (2015). The Relationship between Parenting Styles and Creativity and the Predictability of Creativity by Parenting Styles. Procedia – Social And Behavioral Sciences, 205, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.014pl
    dc.description.referencesMiller, S. (2017). Loneliness, Group Relevance, and Creativity (Masters). University of Wisconsin OshKosh.pl
    dc.description.referencesMoeller, J. (2014). Passion as concept of the psychology of motivation. Conceptualization, assessment, inter-individual variability and longterm stability (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.dbthueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-29036/DissJuliapl
    dc.description.referencesMontuori, A., & Purser, R. (Eds.). (1999). Social creativity (Vol. 1). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesNiu, W. (2007). Individual and Environmental Influences on Chinese Student Creativity. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01286.xpl
    dc.description.referencesO’hara, L.A. & Sternberg, R.J. (2001). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 197–210.pl
    dc.description.referencesPajares, F., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self- concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), BT self-perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesPark, S., Park, K., & Choe, H. (2005). The Relationship Between Thinking Styles and Scientific Giftedness in Korea. Journal Of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-475pl
    dc.description.referencesPintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.pl
    dc.description.referencesPretz, J., & Nelson, D. (2017). Creativity Is Influenced by Domain, Creative Self-Efficacy, Mindset, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Esteem. In M. Karwowski & J. Kaufman, The Creative Self Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 155–170). Academic Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesPugsley, L., & Acar, S. (2018). Supporting Creativity Or Conformity? Influence of Home Environment and Parental Factors on the Value of Children’s Creativity Characteristics. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.393pl
    dc.description.referencesRatelle, C., Larose, S., Guay, F., & Senécal, C. (2005). Perceptions of Parental Involvement and Support as Predictors of College Students’ Persistence in a Science Curriculum. Journal Of Family Psychology, 19(2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.286pl
    dc.description.referencesRojas, J. (2015). The Relationships Among Creativity, Grit, Academic Motivation, And Academic Success In College Students (Ph.D.). University of Kentucky.pl
    dc.description.referencesRojas, J., & Tyler, K. (2018). Measuring the Creative Process: A Psychometric Examination of Creative Ideation and Grit. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411546pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. (1992). Children’s divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12(3), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90010-ypl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. (2005). Motivation, Competence, and Creativity. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck, Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 609–623). Guilford Publishers.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A. (2007). Creativity Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). Cambridge University.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02213373pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M., Acar, S., &Cayirdag, N. (2017). A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 24, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.003pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M., Plucker, J., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_16pl
    dc.description.referencesShalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D.K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univesity Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSteffin, S.A. (1983). Fighting against convergent thinking. Childhood Education, 59, 355–358.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R., & Wagner, R. (1991). MSG thinking style inventory (pp. 140). Star mountain project.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. (1988). Mental Self-Government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development. Human Development, 31(4), 197–224. doi: 10.1159/000275810pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98pl
    dc.description.referencesSun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682pl
    dc.description.referencesTorrance, E.P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesVries, H., & Lubart, T. (2017). Scientific Creativity: Divergent and Convergent Thinking and the Impact of Culture. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.184pl
    dc.description.referencesWallach, M.A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehard& Winston.pl
    dc.description.referencesYang, K., Lee, L., Hong, Z., & Lin, H. (2016). Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal Of Science Education, 38(13), 2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1230685pl
    dc.description.referencesZhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume9pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage51pl
    dc.description.lastpage68pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2022, Vol. 9, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_9_1_2022_B_Barai_R_Kumar_Saha_Predictive_Power_of_Social_Environment.pdf299,45 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons