REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2022, Vol. 9, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20110
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorBarth, Philipp-
    dc.contributor.authorStadtmann, Georg-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-18T07:55:25Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-18T07:55:25Z-
    dc.date.issued2022-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2022, pp. 26-50pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20110-
    dc.description.abstractCreativity assessment can be influenced by rater characteristics, including social group membership, such as gender. As raters are often male, the gender composition of rater panels in the Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) could introduce unintended implicit biases into this measurement methodology. The present study analyzed such biases by examining gender differences in creativity assessment. Method: We applied the CAT and asked male (n = 26) and female (n = 39) judges to rate the creativity of fashion outfits presented on Instagram. We then examined gender differences in mean creativity ratings and rater consistency (inter-rater reliability). In an additional qualitative analysis, we analyzed implicit theories of creativity of female and male raters by comparing the criteria that these raters applied when assessing creativity. Results: We found no systematic support for gender differences in the level of creativity ratings, but observed that rating consistency was significantly higher for female than for male judges. Additional content analysis suggested that female and male raters attached different relative importance to various assessment criteria, indicating gender differences in rating criteria. Discussion: Our study suggests that rater panel composition can indeed affect aspects of creativity assessment, although we do not obtain strong support for a gender-related bias in the CAT methodology.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectconsensual assessment techniquepl
    dc.subjectcreativity assessmentpl
    dc.subjectfashionpl
    dc.subjectgender differencespl
    dc.subjectimplicit theories of creativitypl
    dc.subjectInstagrampl
    dc.subjectinter-rater reliabilitypl
    dc.titleCreativity Ratings of Fashion Outfits Presented on Instagram: Does Gender Matter?pl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2022 Philipp Barth, Georg Stadtmann, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2022-0002-
    dc.description.EmailPhilipp Barth: barth@europa-uni.depl
    dc.description.AffiliationPhilipp Barth - European University Viadrina, Germanypl
    dc.description.AffiliationGeorg Stadtmann - European University Viadrina, Germanypl
    dc.description.referencesAlassani, R., & Göretz, J. (2019). Product placements by micro and macro influencers on Instagram. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing and Social Media. Communication and Social Communities (pp. 251-267). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21905-5_20pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1982a). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1982b). Children’s artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(32), 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282083027pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “the social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview.pl
    dc.description.referencesBaer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1001_3pl
    dc.description.referencesBaer, J. (1998). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00804.xpl
    dc.description.referencesBaer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.xpl
    dc.description.referencesBaer, J., Kaufman, J.C., & Gentile, C.A. (2004). Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11pl
    dc.description.referencesBelia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J., & Cumming, G. (2005). Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.389pl
    dc.description.referencesBonett, D.G., & Wright, T.A. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960pl
    dc.description.referencesCaroff, X., & Besançon, M. (2008). Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.001pl
    dc.description.referencesCarson, S.H., Peterson, J.B., & Higgins, D.M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4pl
    dc.description.referencesCheng, H.H. (2014). The effect of social embeddedness on bloggers’ creativity. Online Information Review, 38(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-06-2013-0144pl
    dc.description.referencesCheung, P.C., & Lau, S. (2010). Gender differences in the creativity of Hong Kong school children: Comparison by using the new electronic Wallach–Kogan Creativity Tests. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481522pl
    dc.description.referencesCohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.pl
    dc.description.referencesCohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155pl
    dc.description.referencesCseh, G.M., & Jeffries, K.K. (2019). A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the Consensual Assessment Technique for creativity research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000220pl
    dc.description.referencesFeingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062001061pl
    dc.description.referencesFreeman, C., Marcketti, S., & Karpova, E. (2017). Creativity of images: Using digital consensual assessment to evaluate mood boards. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0102-4pl
    dc.description.referencesFreeman, C., Son, J., & McRoberts, L.B. (2015). Comparison of novice and expert evaluations of apparel design illustrations using the Consensual Assessment Technique. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2015.1018960pl
    dc.description.referencesGralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students’ gender moderates accuracy of teachers’ ratings of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.36pl
    dc.description.referencesGuo, J., Ge, Y., & Pang, W. (2019). The underlying cognitive mechanisms of the rater effect in creativity assessment: The mediating role of perceived semantic distance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100572pl
    dc.description.referencesHalpern, D.F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesHarris, L.J. (1989). Two sexes in the mind: Perceptual and creative differences between women and men. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1989.tb00514.xpl
    dc.description.referencesHe, W.J. (2018). A 4-year longitudinal study of the sex-creativity relationship in childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood: Findings of mean and variability analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02331pl
    dc.description.referencesHe, W.J., & Wong, W.C. (2011). Gender differences in creative thinking revisited: Findings from analysis of variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 807–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.027pl
    dc.description.referencesHe, W.J., & Wong, W.C. (2021). Gender differences in the distribution of creativity scores: Domain-Specific patterns in divergent thinking and creative problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626911pl
    dc.description.referencesHe, W.J., Wong, W.C., Li, Y., & Xu, H. (2013). A study of the greater male variability hypothesis in creative thinking in mainland China: Male superiority exists. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(8), 882–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.017pl
    dc.description.referencesHedges, L., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269(5220), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7604277pl
    dc.description.referencesHennessey, B.A. (1994). The Consensual Assessment Technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419409534524pl
    dc.description.referencesHickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345709pl
    dc.description.referencesHorn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20047pl
    dc.description.referencesHung, S.-P., Chen, P.-H., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). Improving creativity performance assessment: A rater effect examination with many facet Rasch model. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730331pl
    dc.description.referencesIvcevic, Z. (2009). Creativity map: Toward the next generation of theories of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014918pl
    dc.description.referencesJohnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I.J. (2008). Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: A new look at the old question. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00096.xpl
    dc.description.referencesJu, C., Duan, Y., & You, X. (2015). Retesting the greater male variability hypothesis in mainland China: A cross-regional study. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.021pl
    dc.description.referencesJustyńska, M. (2020). The issue of assessment criteria for performance of creative tasks with the example of the Odyssey of the Mind. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 7(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0009pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Jankowska, D.M., Gajda, A., Marczak, M., Groyecka, A., & Sorokowski, P. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity outside the WEIRD world. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1229978pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Jankowska, D.M., Gralewski, J., Gajda, A., Wisniewska, E., & Lebuda, I. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity: A latent variables approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.005pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Agars, M.D., & Loomis, D. (2010). Creativity stereotypes and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481529pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Baer, J., & Cole, J.C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.xpl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Cole, J.C., & Sexton, J.D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802059929pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Baer, J., & Gentile, C.A. (2004). Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.21626057.2004.tb01231.xpl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Gentile, C.A., & Baer, J. (2005). Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 260–265.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Niu, W., Sexton, J.D., & Cole, J.C. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Differences across ethnicity and gender in evaluating creative work. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(2), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00584.xpl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.pl
    dc.description.referencesKim, J.H., & Choi, I. (2021). Choosing the level of significance: A decision-theoretic approach. Abacus, 57(1), 27–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12172pl
    dc.description.referencesKrippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesLau, S., & Cheung, P.C. (2015). A gender-fair look at variability in creativity: Growth in variability over a period versus gender comparison at a time point. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.992685pl
    dc.description.referencesLin, W.L., Hsu, K.Y., Chen, H.C., & Wang, J.W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026241pl
    dc.description.referencesLoewenstein, J., & Mueller, J. (2016). Implicit theories of creative ideas: How culture guides creativity assessments. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(4), 320–348. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2014.0147pl
    dc.description.referencesLong, H. (2014). More than appropriateness and novelty: Judges’ criteria of assessing creative products in science tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.05.002pl
    dc.description.referencesLong, H., & Pang, W. (2015). Rater effects in creativity assessment: A mixed methods investigation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 15, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.10.004pl
    dc.description.referencesMartin, L., & Wilson, N. (2017). Defining creativity with discovery. Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376543pl
    dc.description.referencesMierdel, J., & Bogner, F.X. (2019). Is creativity, hands-on modeling and cognitive learning gender-dependent? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.001pl
    dc.description.referencesMullineaux, P.Y., & Dilalla, L.F. (2009). Preschool pretend play behaviors and early adolescent creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01305.xpl
    dc.description.referencesMyszkowski, N., & Storme, M. (2019). Judge response theory? A call to upgrade our psychometrical account of creativity judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000225pl
    dc.description.referencesNiu, W., & Sternberg, R.J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000036pl
    dc.description.referencesNunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.A. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.pl
    dc.description.referencesPhonethibsavads, A., Bender, S., & Peppler, K. (2019). Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to compare creativity in drama spaces. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 6(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2019-0001pl
    dc.description.referencesPiirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? (Creative women: Visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13(3), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199109553340pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A., Cramond, B., & Pagnani, A.R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J.C. Chrisler, & D.R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_17pl
    dc.description.referencesSaid-Metwaly, S., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2017). Approaches to measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 238–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0013pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D.K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.829pl
    dc.description.referencesTaylor, C.L., & Barbot, B. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: Examining the greater male variability hypothesis in different domains and tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110661pl
    dc.description.referencesWarren, F., Mason-Apps, E., Hoskins, S., Azmi, Z., & Boyce, J. (2018). The role of implicit theories, age, and gender in the creative performance of children and adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.010pl
    dc.description.referencesWhite, A., Shen, F., & Smith, B.L. (2002). Judging advertising creativity using the Creative Product Semantic Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01067.xpl
    dc.description.referencesZhang, W., Ren, P., & Deng, L. (2020). Gender differences in the creativity–academic achievement relationship: A study from China. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.387pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume9pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage26pl
    dc.description.lastpage50pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2022, Vol. 9, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_9_1_2022_P_Barth_G_Stadtmann_Creativity_Ratings_of_Fashion_Outfits_Presented_on_Instagram.pdf375,67 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons