REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20063
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorPuente-Diaz, Rogelio-
dc.contributor.authorCavazos-Arroyo, Judith-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-15T05:45:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-15T05:45:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 8, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 20-31pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20063-
dc.description.abstractThe amount of attention given to creative beliefs has increased in recent years. This article suggests that the selection of one´s best ideas from a set of self-generated alternatives should be included as an indicator of metacognition; something known as creative metacognition accuracy. The present investigation examined the role of creative mindsets and creative personal identity on the selection of one´s best idea, creative self-efficacy, and potential, under two conceptualizations of these beliefs: latent variables and latent classes. College business students completed a battery of questionnaires assessing creative mindsets, creative personal identity, and creative self-efficacy. In addition, participants completed a divergent thinking task involving improvement of smartphones an-d were asked to choose their best idea. Two independent judges also selected the best idea from participants’ set of self-generated ideas. Under the latent class conceptualization, a class with high levels of growth mindset and creative personal identity, and low levels of a fixed mindset showed higher levels of accurate idea selection and creative self-efficacy than the rest of the classes. Similarly, under the latent variable conceptualization, creative personal identity had a positive influence on accurate idea selection and creative self-efficacy.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectcreative personal identitypl
dc.subjectcreative metacognitionpl
dc.subjectcreative beliefspl
dc.subjectcreative self-efficacypl
dc.subjectcreative potentialpl
dc.titleCreative Personal Identity and Creative Mindsets, and Their Implications for Creative Potential and Metacognition: A Latent Variable and a Latent Class Approachpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Rogelio Puente-Diaz, Judith Cavazos-Arroyo, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2021-0015-
dc.description.EmailRogelio Puente-Diaz: rogelio.puente@anahuac.mxpl
dc.description.AffiliationRogelio Puente-Diaz - School of Business and Economics, Universidad Anáhuac México, Mexicopl
dc.description.AffiliationJudith Cavazos-Arroyo - Centro Interdisciplinario de Posgrados, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Mexicopl
dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.pl
dc.description.referencesAsparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: 3-step approaches using Mplus. Webnote, 15, 1–51. https://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote15.pdf. Retrieved on July, 2020.pl
dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R.A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In M. Karwowski & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 4–22). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBirney, D.P., Beckmann, J.F., & Seah, Y.-Z. (2016). More than the eye of the beholder: The interplay of person, task, and situation factors in evaluative judgements of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.007pl
dc.description.referencesBrown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.pl
dc.description.referencesFarmer, S.M., & Tierney, P. (2017). Considering creative self-efficacy: Its current state and ideas for future inquiry. In M. Karwowski & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 23–47). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesFarmer, S.M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (5), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040653pl
dc.description.referencesGocłowska, M.A., & Crisp, R.J. (2014). How dual-identity processes foster creativity. Review of General Psychology, 18(3), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000008pl
dc.description.referencesGrohman, M., Wodniecka, Z., & Kłusak, M. (2006). Divergent thinking and evaluation skills: Do they always go together? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01269.xpl
dc.description.referencesHaslam, S.A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(4), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498001pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034898pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M. (2016). The dynamics of creative self-concept: Changes and reciprocal relations between creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10400419.2016.1125254pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Cambridge companion to reason and development (pp. 302–326). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Brzeski, A. (2017). Creative mindsets: Prospects and challenges. In M. Karwowski & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 367–383). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Kaufman, J.C. (Eds.) (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 214-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000035pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Czerwonka, M., & Kaufman, J.C. (2020). Does intelligence strengthen creative metacognition? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000208pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Han, M.H., & Beghetto, R.A. (2019). Toward dynamizing the measurement of creative confidence beliefs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/ aca0000229pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R.A. (2019). Creative self-beliefs. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Royston, R.P., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Exploring creative mindsets: Variable and person-centered approaches. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000170pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.799413pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.pl
dc.description.referencesKornish, L.J., & Ulrich, K.T. (2014). The importance of the raw idea in innovation: Testing the sow’s ear hypothesis. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0401pl
dc.description.referencesMasyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T.D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 551–611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesPlaks, J.E. (2017). Implicit theories: Assumptions that shape social and moral cognition. In J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 56. Advances in experimental social psychology (p. 259-310). Elsevier Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R. (2016). Creative self-efficacy: An exploration of its antecedents, consequences and applied implications. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150(2), 175–195. https ://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1051498pl
dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2017). The influence of creative mindsets on achievement goals, enjoyment, creative self-efficacy and performance among business students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.007pl
dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2019). Creative mindsets and their affective and social Consequences: A latent class approach. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.217pl
dc.description.referencesPuryear, J.S. (2015). Metacognition as a moderator of creative ideation and creative production. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087270pl
dc.description.referencesRietzschel, E.F. & Ritter, S. (2018). Moving from creativity to innovation. In R. Reiter-Palmon, V.L. Kennel, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace (3–34). Academic Press: Cambridge, MA.pl
dc.description.referencesRoyston, R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Creative self-efficacy as a mediator between creative mindsets and creative problem-solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 472–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.226pl
dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A., & Smith, W.R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-Xpl
dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A., & Dow, G.T. (2004). Assessing the accuracy of judgments of originality on three divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 14(2), 5–14.pl
dc.description.referencesShalley, C.E., Hitt, M.A., & Zhou, J. (2015). Introduction: Integrating creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship to enhance the organization’s capability to navigate in the new competitive landscape. In C.E. Shalley, M.A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Oxford.pl
dc.description.referencesSilvia, P.J. (2008). Discernment and creativity: How well can people identify their most creative ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.139pl
dc.description.referencesSteffens, N.K., Goclowska, M.A., Cruwys, T. & Gallinsky, A.D. (2015). How multiple social identities are related to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215619875pl
dc.description.referencesSwann, W.B., Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.pl
dc.description.referencesSwann, W.B., Jr. (1984). The quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91(4), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.4.457pl
dc.description.referencesSwann, W.B., Jr. & Bosson, J. (2010). Self and Identity. In S.T. Fiske, D.T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed; 589–628). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.pl
dc.description.referencesTierney, P., & Farmer, S.M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952pl
dc.description.referencesWest, S.G., Taylor, A.B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
dc.description.volume8pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage20pl
dc.description.lastpage31pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Creativity_8_2_2021_R_Puente_Diaz_J_Cavazos_Arroyo_Creative_Personal_Identity.pdf220,95 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons