REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20062
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorLang, Jacob-
dc.contributor.authorCupchik, Gerald C.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-15T05:44:36Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-15T05:44:36Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 8, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 4-19pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20062-
dc.description.abstractThis article describes the development and testing of a novel creative and reflective writing task. Following the rationale of sand-tray and play therapies, participants were asked to meaningfully incorporate four objects from a randomly generated matrix of options into a creative short story. They then composed a second story that incorporated four possessions from home associated with important memories. Afterwards, participants produced interpretive statements or reflections on what the stories meant to them. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted based on narrative data from 15 young adult participants in Canada. Our goals were to: (a) explore the extent to which object familiarity was associated with qualitative differences in stories and interpretations, and (b) investigate for connections between features of participants’ stories and depth of interpretation. Analysis of creative stories resulted in a scheme of four response categories with ten subcategories. Participants’ interpretations of their own stories were coded based on self-described sources of inspiration, such as critical life episodes or popular media. Results are accompanied with excerpts of participants’ stories and reflections, and percentage comparisons are reported. Findings are presented in dialogue with established interpretive frameworks originating in depth psychology. Manipulation of object familiarity resulted in demonstrable differences at the levels of word length, point of view, narrative forms and features, self-disclosure, and reflection. Use of familiar objects in such a task appears to be a largely untapped resource that shows promise as a route to insight.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectcreative writingpl
dc.subjectnarrativepl
dc.subjectexpressionpl
dc.subjectinsightpl
dc.subjectself-reflectionpl
dc.subjectimaginationpl
dc.title“The Story is My Life”: Bridging Symbol to Self in a Novel Creative and Reflective Writing Taskpl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Jacob Lang, Gerald C. Cupchik, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2021-0014-
dc.description.EmailJacob Lang: jacob.lang@mail.utoronto.capl
dc.description.AffiliationJacob Lang - Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canadapl
dc.description.AffiliationGerald C. Cupchik - Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canadapl
dc.description.referencesBühler, K., & Heim, G. (2001). General introduction to the psychotherapy of Pierre Janet. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 55(1), 74–91.pl
dc.description.referencesCampbell, J. (2008). The hero with a thousand faces. San Francisco, CA: New World Library. (Original work published 1949).pl
dc.description.referencesChen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2011). Effects of Explicit Instruction to “Be Creative” Across Domains and Cultures. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01252.xpl
dc.description.referencesCreswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.pl
dc.description.referencesEdinger, E.F. (1992). Ego and archetype. Boulder, CA: Shambhala.pl
dc.description.referencesEllenberger, H.F. (1981). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1970).pl
dc.description.referencesFeng, Z., Logan, S., Cupchik, G.C., Ritterfeld, U., & Gaffin, D. (2017). A cross-cultural exploration of imagination as a process-based concept. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(1), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617712006pl
dc.description.referencesGiegerich, W. (2013). The flight into the unconscious: An analysis of C.G. Jung’s psychology project. New Orleans, LA: Spring Journal Books.pl
dc.description.referencesHalpenny, E.A., & Linzmayer, C.D. (2013). “It was fun”: An evaluation of sand tray pictures, an innovative visually expressive method for researching children’s experiences with nature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 310–337.pl
dc.description.referencesHumphrey, K.M. (2009). Cognitive-behavioral and constructivist strategies for loss adaptation. In Counseling strategies for loss and grief (pp. 57–142). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.pl
dc.description.referencesIgnatius of Loyola (2015). The spiritual exercises of St. Ignatius (L. J. Puhl, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House Vintage Books.pl
dc.description.referencesJanet, P. (1920). The major symptoms of hysteria: Lectures given in the Medical School of Harvard University. New York, NY: The Macmillan Co.pl
dc.description.referencesJung, C.G. (2008). On the method of dream interpretation. In M. Meyer-Grass, & L. Jung (Eds.). E. Falzeder, & T. Woolfson (Trans.), Children’s dreams: Notes from the seminar given in 1936–1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1940).pl
dc.description.referencesJung, C.G. (1968). Man and his symbols. New York, NY: Dell. (Original work published 1964).pl
dc.description.referencesJung, C.G. (1951). Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of the self. F.C. Hull (Trans.). London, UK: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesLang, J., Stamatopoulou, D., & Cupchik, G.C. (2020). A qualitative inquiry into the experience of sacred art among Eastern and Western Christians in Canada. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 42(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420933357pl
dc.description.referencesLaing, R.D. (1967). The politics of experience and the bird of paradise. London, UK: Penguin.pl
dc.description.referencesLeary, D.E. (2005). Objects, meanings, and connections in my life and career. In G. Yancy, & S. Hadley (Eds.), Narrative identities: Psychologists engaged in self-construction (pp. 54–72). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.pl
dc.description.referencesLynn, S.J., & Rhue, J.W. (Eds.). (1994). Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMagnuson, S. & Sangganjanavanich, V.F. (2011). Effective techniques: Using sand trays and miniature figures to facilitate career decision making. The Career Development Quarterly, 59, 264–273.pl
dc.description.referencesMcNiff, S. (2004). Art heals: How creativity cures the soul. Boston, MA: Shambhala.pl
dc.description.referencesMoreno-Martínez, F.J., & Montoro, P.R. (2012). An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables. PLoS One, 7(5), e37527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037527pl
dc.description.referencesNeimeyer, R.A., Torres, C., & Smith, D.C. (2011). The virtual dream: Rewriting stories of loss and grief. Death Studies, 35(7), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2011.570596pl
dc.description.referencesNiu, W., & Liu, D. (2009). Enhancing creativity: A comparison between effects of an indicative instruction “to be creative” and a more elaborate heuristic instruction on Chinese student creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013660pl
dc.description.referencesOrwell, G. (2008). Animal farm. London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1945).pl
dc.description.referencesShamdasani, S. (2009). Introduction. In C.G. Jung, The red book: Liber novus, reader’s edition (pp. 1–97). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.pl
dc.description.referencesSlayton, S.C., D’Archer, J., & Kaplan, F. (2011). Outcome studies on the efficacy of art therapy: A review of the findings. Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 27(3), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2010.10129660pl
dc.description.referencesSpitzer, C., Barnow, S., Freyberger, H.J., & Grabe, H.J. (2006). Recent developments in the theory of dissociation. World Psychiatry, 5(2), 82–86.pl
dc.description.referencesTalwar, S. (2006). Accessing traumatic memory through art making: An art therapy trauma protocol (ATTP). The Arts in Psychotherapy, 34, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2006.09.001pl
dc.description.referencesTobin, G.A., & Begley, C.M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388-396.pl
dc.description.referencesVezzoli, C. (2019). Janet and Jung: A stimulating relationship. In G. Craparo, F. Oru, & O. van der Hart (Eds.), Rediscovering Pierre Janet: Trauma, dissociation, and a new context for psychoanalysis. London, UK: Routledge.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
dc.description.volume8pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage4pl
dc.description.lastpage19pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Creativity_8_2_2021_J_Lang_G_C_Cupchik_The_Story_is_My_Life.pdf249,53 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons