REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20056
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorAgnoli, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorZenari, Sofia-
dc.contributor.authorMastria, Serena-
dc.contributor.authorCorazza, Giovanni Emanuele-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-13T09:34:40Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-13T09:34:40Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 148-164pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20056-
dc.description.abstractIn the Dynamic Creativity Framework creativity is defined as a context-embedded phenomenon requiring potential originality and effectiveness. This definition indicates that the environmental conditions embedding the creative process have fundamental impact on the process itself and its outcomes. In particular, Virtual environments (VEs) are emerging as everyday contexts for a large part of the world population, affecting behaviors and feelings. VEs have been demonstrated to affect creative performance in several ways, even if the psychological mechanisms at the basis of the different modifications in the creative behavior are far from being completely explained. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of different types of VEs on creative performance, with a specific focus on participants’ emotional reactions and on their individual differences in the Openness personality trait. A total of 22 participants were exposed to four different types of environments: a real room environment (RE), a control virtual environment (CVE) resembling the physical characteristics of the RE, a positive virtual environment (PVE) and a negative virtual environment (NVE). Participants were free to explore each environment for two minutes, then they were asked to perform an Alternative Uses Task for five minutes, to measure divergent thinking performance. Openness and affective reactions in each environment were measured in all participants. Results showed that Openness was associated with higher originality of responses and that this effect was particularly significant in PVE. Importantly, the type of environment interacted significantly with participants’ affective reactions in explaining their creative performance, revealing that an increase of ideas originality was associated with an increase of positive affect, emerging as a consequence of experiencing a PVE. Affective reactions to VEs, in combination with individual differences in term of Openness, thus emerge as one of the possible explicatory mechanisms of the impact of virtual reality on creative performance.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
dc.subjectvirtual environmentpl
dc.subjectdivergent thinkingpl
dc.subjectemotionspl
dc.subjectopennesspl
dc.subjectcreativitypl
dc.titleHow do You Feel in Virtual Environments? The Role of Emotions and Openness Trait Over Creative Performancepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Sergio Agnoli, Sofia Zenari, Serena Mastria, Giovanni Emanuele Corazza, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2021-0010-
dc.description.EmailSergio Agnoli: sergio.agnoli@unibo.itpl
dc.description.AffiliationSergio Agnoli - Marconi Institute for Creativity (MIC), Villa Griffone, Sasso Marconi, Bologna, Italy; Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italypl
dc.description.AffiliationSofia Zenari - Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italypl
dc.description.AffiliationSerena Mastria - Marconi Institute for Creativity (MIC), Villa Griffone, Sasso Marconi, Bologna, Italy; Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italypl
dc.description.AffiliationGiovanni Emanuele Corazza - Marconi Institute for Creativity (MIC), Villa Griffone, Sasso Marconi, Bologna, Italy; Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Université de Paris and Univ Gustave Eiffel, LaPEA, Boulogne-Billancourt, Francepl
dc.description.referencesAgnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G.E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 125–132.pl
dc.description.referencesAgnoli, S., Pittarello, A., Hysenbelli, D., & Rubaltelli, E. (2015). “Give, but give until it hurts”: The modulatory role of trait emotional intelligence on the motivation to help. PloS one, 10(6), e0130704.pl
dc.description.referencesAshby, F.G., Isen, A.M., & Turken, A.U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.pl
dc.description.referencesBaas, M., De Dreu, C.K., & Nijstad, B.A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779.pl
dc.description.referencesBourgeois-Bougrine, S., Richard, P., Burkhardt, J.M., Frantz, B., & Lubart, T. (2020). The expression of users’ creative potential in virtual and real environments: An exploratory study. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 55-65.pl
dc.description.referencesChirico, A., & Gaggioli, A. (2019). When virtual feels real: comparing emotional responses and presence in virtual and natural environments. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(3), 220-226.pl
dc.description.referencesChirico, A., Yaden, D.B., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. (2016). The potential of virtual reality for the investigation of awe. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1766.pl
dc.description.referencesCorazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 258–267.pl
dc.description.referencesCorazza, G.E., & Agnoli, S. (2020). Personality: Openness. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, 3rd Edition. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.pl
dc.description.referencesCorazza, G.E., & Lubart. T., (2021). Intelligence and Creativity: Mapping Constructs on the Space-Time Continuum. Journal of Intelligence, 9: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010001pl
dc.description.referencesCosta, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 5.pl
dc.description.referencesFaul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175-191.pl
dc.description.referencesFelnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O.D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A.K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International journal of human-computer studies, 82, 48–56.pl
dc.description.referencesFeist, G.J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.pl
dc.description.referencesForgas, J.P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Paris: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesGoritz A.S., & Moser K. (2003). Mood and flexibility in categorization: A conceptual replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(1), 107–119.pl
dc.description.referencesGuegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N., & Segonds, F. (2016). Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.024pl
dc.description.referencesGuegan, J., Nelson, J., & Lubart, T. (2017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 202–206.pl
dc.description.referencesIsen A.M., Daubman K.A., & Nowicki G.P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.pl
dc.description.referencesJauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A.C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: a latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105.pl
dc.description.referencesKalantari, S., Rounds, J.D., Kan, J., Tripathi, V., & Cruz-Garza, J.G. (2021). Comparing physiological responses during cognitive tests in virtual environments vs. in identical real-world environments. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–14.pl
dc.description.referencesMastria, S., Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G.E. (2019). How does emotion influence the creativity evaluation of exogenous alternative ideas?. PloS one, 14(7), e0219298.pl
dc.description.referencesMichinov, N., Jamet, E., Métayer, N., & Le Hénaff, B. (2015). The eyes of creativity: Impact of social comparison and individual creativity on performance and attention to others’ ideas during electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 57–67.pl
dc.description.referencesPena, J., Hancock, J., & Merola, N. (2009). The priming effects of avatars in virtual settings. Communication Research, 36, 838–856.pl
dc.description.referencesRagan, E.D., Bowman, D.A., & Huber, K.J. (2012). Supporting cognitive processing with spatial information presentations in virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 16(4), 301–314.pl
dc.description.referencesRiva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C.S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., ... & Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 10(1), 45–56.pl
dc.description.referencesShin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience?. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64–73.pl
dc.description.referencesSilvia, P.J., Winterstein, B.P., Willse, J.T., Barona, C.M., Cram, J.T., Hess, K.I., Martinez, J.L., & Richard, C.A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthtetics Creativity and the Arts, 2, 68–85.pl
dc.description.referencesThornhill-Miller, B., & Dupont, J.-M. (2016). Virtual reality and the enhancement of creativity and innovation: Under recognized potential among converging technologies? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 102–121.pl
dc.description.referencesVergara, D., Lorenzo, M., & Rubio, M.P. (2017). Virtual environments in materials science and engineering: the students’ opinion. In Materials Science and Engineering: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1465–1483). IGI Global.pl
dc.description.referencesVerhaeghen P., Joormann J., & Khan R. (2005). Why we sing the blues: The relation between self- reflective rumination, mood, and creativity. Emotion, 5, 226–232.pl
dc.description.referencesWatson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. University of Iowa: Psychology Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesWilson, R.C., Guilford, J.P., & Christensen, P.R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
dc.description.volume8pl
dc.description.issue1pl
dc.description.firstpage148pl
dc.description.lastpage164pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons