REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20054
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorCeh, Simon M.-
dc.contributor.authorBenedek, Mathias-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-13T08:02:28Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-13T08:02:28Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 108-123pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20054-
dc.description.abstractDigitalization, underpinned by the ongoing pandemic, has transferred many of our everyday activities to online places. In this study, we wanted to find out what online outlets people use to share their creative work and why they do it. We found that most people posted creative work online at least a few times per year. They especially shared creative content related to creative cooking, visual art, and literature but hardly related to performing art. YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram were the three platforms with the highest familiarity and usage rates; among these, YouTube was most strongly used passively (i.e., to view creative content), while Instagram was most strongly used actively (i.e., to post one’s own creative content). We could further differentiate platforms that were domain-specific (e.g., Stackoverflow for scientific/technological creativity) from platforms that offer a broader variety of creative content (e.g., Reddit, Blogger). The reasoning behind posting one’s creative work online resembled a mixture of technological facilitation, alongside heightened accessibility that allows for feedback and bringing pleasure to one’s followers and friends. All in all, this study provides a first overview of where and why people share their creative products online, shedding light on timely forms of creative expression.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
dc.subjectcreativitypl
dc.subjectonlinepl
dc.subjectInternetpl
dc.subjectcreative contentpl
dc.titleWhere to Share? A Systematic Investigation of Creative Behavior on Online Platformspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Simon M. Ceh, Mathias Benedek, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2021-0008-
dc.description.EmailSimon M. Ceh: simon.ceh@uni-graz.atpl
dc.description.AffiliationSimon M. Ceh - Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Austriapl
dc.description.AffiliationMathias Benedek - Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Austriapl
dc.description.referencesBakhshi, S., & Gilbert, E. (2015). Red, purple and pink: The colors of diffusion on pinterest. PLoS ONE, 10(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117148pl
dc.description.referencesBenedek, M., Bruckdorfer, R., & Jauk, E. (2020). Motives for Creativity: Exploring the What and Why of Everyday Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.396pl
dc.description.referencesBenedek, M., Christensen, A.P., Fink, A., & Beaty, R.E. (2019). Creativity assessment in neuroscience research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000215pl
dc.description.referencesBrabham, D.C. (2010). Moving the crowd at threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Information Communication and Society, 13(8), 1122–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003624090pl
dc.description.referencesBruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. Peter Lang.pl
dc.description.referencesChae, J. (2018). Reexamining the relationship between social media and happiness: The effects of various social media platforms on reconceptualized happiness. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 1656–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.04.011pl
dc.description.referencesde Saint Laurent, C., Glăveanu, V., & Chaudet, C. (2020). Malevolent Creativity and Social Media: Creating Anti-immigration Communities on Twitter. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712164pl
dc.description.referencesDumas, T.M., Maxwell-Smith, M., Davis, J.P., & Giulietti, P.A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037pl
dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. (2015). Creativity as a Sociocultural Act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.94pl
dc.description.referencesHelmond, A. (2015). The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready. Social Media + Society, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080pl
dc.description.referencesHennessey, B.A. (2019). Motivation and Creativity. In J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., pp. 374–395). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839pl
dc.description.referencesKim, N.W. (2017). Creative Community Demystified: A Statistical Overview of Behance. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314182350_Creative_Community_Demystified_A_Statistical_Overview_of_Behancepl
dc.description.referencesKircaburun, K., Griffiths, M.D., Şahin, F., Bahtiyar, M., Atmaca, T., & Tosuntaş, Ş.B. (2020). The Mediating Role of Self/Everyday Creativity and Depression on the Relationship Between Creative Personality Traits and Problematic Social Media Use Among Emerging Adults. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9938-0pl
dc.description.referencesLiterat, I. (2012). The Work of Art in the Age of Mediated Participation. Internation Journal of Communication, 11, 2962–2984. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1531pl
dc.description.referencesLiterat, I. (2015). Crowdsourced Art: Activating Creative Participation in Online Spaces. University of Southern California.pl
dc.description.referencesLiterat, I. (2019). Make, share, review, remix: Unpacking the impact of the internet on contemporary creativity. Convergence, 25(5–6), 1168–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517751391pl
dc.description.referencesLiterat, I., & Glăveanu, V. (2018). Distributed Creativity on the Internet: A Theoretical Foundation for Online Creative Participation. International Journal of Communication, 12(0), 16. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7621pl
dc.description.referencesLiterat, I., & Glăveanu, V.P. (2016). Same but Different? Distributed Creativity in the Internet Age. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 3(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0020pl
dc.description.referencesLiterat, I., & van den Berg, S. (2019). Buy memes low, sell memes high: vernacular criticism and collective negotiations of value on Reddit’s MemeEconomy. Information Communication and Society, 22(2), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366540pl
dc.description.referencesLopez-Persem, A., Bieth, T., Guiet, S., & Ovando-tellez, M. (n.d.). Through thick and thin: changes in creativity during the first lockdown of the Covid-19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/26qdepl
dc.description.referencesMull, I.R., & Lee, S.E. (2014). “PIN” pointing the motivational dimensions behind Pinterest. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.011pl
dc.description.referencesRichterich, A. (2014). ‘Karma, Precious Karma!’ Karmawhoring on Reddit and the Front Page’s Econometrisation. Journal of Peer Production, 4(1), 1–12. http://peerproduction.netpl
dc.description.referencesRunco, M. (2015). The Real Creativity Crisis. Creativity & Human Development, Jan, 1–10.pl
dc.description.referencesSeiffert-Brockmann, J., Diehl, T., & Dobusch, L. (2018). Memes as games: The evolution of a digital discourse online. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2862–2879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817735334pl
dc.description.referencesSheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059pl
dc.description.referencesVásquez, C., & Aslan, E. (2021). “Cats be outside, how about meow”: Multimodal humor and creativity in an internet meme. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006pl
dc.description.referencesVerduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well-Being? A Critical Review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033pl
dc.description.referencesXing, B. (2018). Creativity and Artificial Intelligence: A Digital Art Perspective. Social Science Research Network, 1–55.pl
dc.description.referencesYouTube Official Blog. (2021). Youtube By The Numbers. blog.youtube.com/presspl
dc.description.referencesZittrain, J.L. (2014). Reflections on Internet Culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 13(3), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544540pl
dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
dc.description.volume8pl
dc.description.issue1pl
dc.description.firstpage108pl
dc.description.lastpage123pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Creativity_8_1_2021_S_M_Ceh_M_Benedek _Where_to_Share.pdf4,51 MBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons