REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20053
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorShimizu, Daichi-
    dc.contributor.authorYomogida, Yukihito-
    dc.contributor.authorShijun, Wang-
    dc.contributor.authorOkada, Takeshi-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-13T07:20:28Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-13T07:20:28Z-
    dc.date.issued2021-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 89-107pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20053-
    dc.description.abstractRecently, the importance of creativity in society has been clearly recognized. Furthermore, educational practices through art, such as the STEAM paradigm, are being implemented gradually. However, the framework of how creativity should be fostered through art has not been sufficiently discussed. Based on studies of artists’ creative expertise, this study proposed a framework for fostering creativity through art. In addition, we conducted a year-long art program based on this framework in an online environment and investigated its effects. As a framework, we proposed the importance of long-term support for the dynamic development of participants’ creativity. We mainly focused on the following four components: active interaction with objects and the environment through bodily action, active interaction with others and their works (inspiration), exploration in creative processes (exploration), and promotion of intrinsic motivation and decrease in creativity anxiety (motivation). After a total of eight workshops over a year, we observed improvements in the participants’ creativity anxiety, divergent thinking skills, images of art and creation, and openness to others. We discussed the effectiveness of the proposed framework and the advantages and limitations of using an online environment.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 20H01761 and the Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research 20K20814 granted to the first and fourth author from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectcreativitypl
    dc.subjectcreativity facilitationpl
    dc.subjectSTEAMpl
    dc.subjectonline environmentpl
    dc.subjecteducational effectpl
    dc.titleExploring the Potential of Art Workshop: An Attempt to Foster People’s Creativity in an Online Environmentpl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2021 Daichi Shimizu, Ibuki Yomogida, Wang Shijun, Takeshi Okada, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2021-0007-
    dc.description.EmailDaichi Shimizu: tothefuture0415@yahoo.co.jppl
    dc.description.AffiliationDaichi Shimizu - Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyopl
    dc.description.AffiliationIbuki Yomogida - Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyopl
    dc.description.AffiliationWang Shijun - Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyopl
    dc.description.AffiliationTakeshi Okada - Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyopl
    dc.description.referencesAgata, T., & Okada, T. (2010). How Do Perceptions of Artistic Creation Affect Motivation for Artistic Expression and Art Appreciation? The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.58.438pl
    dc.description.referencesAllina, B. (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1296392pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123–167.pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995pl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R.A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. In Creativity Under Duress in Education? (pp. 27–40). Springer, Cham.pl
    dc.description.referencesBotella, M., Glaveanu, V., Zenasni, F., Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Wolff, M., & Lubart, T. (2013). How artists create: Creative process and multivariate factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 161–170. https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.008pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in psychology, 6(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732118X(88)90001-3pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In The systems model of creativity (pp. 47–61). Springer, Dordrecht.pl
    dc.description.referencesDaker, R.J., Cortes, R.A., Lyons, I.M., & Green, A.E. (2020). Creativity anxiety: Evidence for anxiety that is specific to creative thinking, from STEM to the arts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000630pl
    dc.description.referencesFlorida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic books.pl
    dc.description.referencesFlorida, R.L., & Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.pl
    dc.description.referencesGates, A.E. (2017). Benefits of a STEAM collaboration in Newark, New Jersey: Volcano simulation through a glass-making experience. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.5408/16188.1pl
    dc.description.referencesGetzels, J.W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The Creative Vision: Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V.P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528pl
    dc.description.referencesGraham, N.J., & Brouillette, L. (2016). Using Arts Integration to Make Science Learning Memorable in the Upper Elementary Grades: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 12(1).pl
    dc.description.referencesGruber, T.R. (1989). Automated knowledge acquisition for strategic knowledge. In Knowledge Acquisition: Selected Research and Commentary (pp. 47–90). Boston, MA: Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesGuilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American psychologist, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487pl
    dc.description.referencesInoa, R., Weltsek, G., & Tabone, C. (2014). A Study on the Relationship between Theater Arts and Student Literacy and Mathematics Achievement. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 10(1), n1. https://doi.org/10.21977/D910123495pl
    dc.description.referencesIshiguro, C., & Okada, T. (2020). How Does Art Viewing Inspires Creativity?. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.469pl
    dc.description.referencesMcGranahan, D., & Wojan, T. (2007). Recasting the creative class to examine growth processes in rural and urban counties. Regional studies, 41(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600928285pl
    dc.description.referencesOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers.pl
    dc.description.referencesOkada, T., Yokochi, S., Ishibashi, K., & Ueda, K. (2009). Analogical modification in the creation of contemporary art. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.09.007pl
    dc.description.referencesOkada, T., & Ishibashi, K. (2017). Imitation, inspiration, and creation: Cognitive process of creative drawing by copying others’ artworks. Cognitive science, 41(7), 1804–1837. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12442pl
    dc.description.referencesPerignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002pl
    dc.description.referencesRoot-Bernstein, R., Allen, L., Beach, L., Bhadula, R., Fast, J., Hosey, C., ... & Weinlander, S. (2008). Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of nobel, national academy, royal society, and sigma xi members. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1891/1939-7054.1.2.51pl
    dc.description.referencesScott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity research journal, 16(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549pl
    dc.description.referencesShimizu, D., & Okada, T. (2018). How do creative experts practice new skills? Exploratory practice in breakdancers. Cognitive science, 42(7), 2364–2396. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12668pl
    dc.description.referencesShimizu, D., Hirashima, M., & Okada, T. (2019). Interaction between Idea-generation and Idea-externalization Processes in Artistic Creation: Study of an Expert Breakdancer. Proceedings of the of the 41st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1041–1047.pl
    dc.description.referencesShimizu, D., & Okada, T. (2020). Relaxation and Reorganization of “Internal Constraints” in Artistic Creation: Studies Focusing on the Embodiment of Ideas and Interaction with Others in Breakdance. In K. Knutson, T. Okada, & K. Crowley (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Art Learning and Creativity (pp. 47-63). New York: Routledge.pl
    dc.description.referencesShimizu, D., & Okada, T. (2021). Interaction between the action and cognition in creativity: perception and action-based imagination framework. Proceedings of the of the 43st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society.pl
    dc.description.referencesScott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity research journal, 16(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549pl
    dc.description.referencesTakagi, K., Okada, T., & Yokochi, S. (2013). Formation of an art concept: How is visual information from photography utilized by the artist in concept formation?. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 20(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.11225/jcss.20.59pl
    dc.description.referencesTorrance, E.P. (1960). Explorations in creative thinking. Education, 81, 216–220.pl
    dc.description.referencesTorrance, E.P. (1962). Cultural discontinuities and the development of originality of thinking. Exceptional Children, 29(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440296202900102pl
    dc.description.referencesTorrance, E.P., & Hall, L.K. (1980). Assessing the Further Reaches of Creative Potential. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1980.tb00220.xpl
    dc.description.referencesWard, T.B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive psychology, 27(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1010pl
    dc.description.referencesWard, B.W. (2004). Faith, Romance, and Imagination: Newman the Storyteller. In Victorian Religious Discourse (pp. 175–187). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.pl
    dc.description.referencesWard, T.B., & Sifonis, C.M. (1997). Tosh demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same?. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(4), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00797.xpl
    dc.description.referencesWojan, T.R., Lambert, D.M., & McGranahan, D.A. (2007). Emoting with their feet: Bohemian attraction to creative milieu. Journal of economic geography, 7(6), 711–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm029pl
    dc.description.referencesYokochi, S., & Okada, T. (2005). Creative cognitive process of art making: A field study of a traditional Chinese ink painter. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2–3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1702&3_9pl
    dc.description.referencesYokochi, S., & Okada, T. (2020). The Process of Art-making and Creative Expertise: An Analysis of Artists’ Process Modification. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/ doi: 10.1002/jocb.472pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume8pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage89pl
    dc.description.lastpage107pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_8_1_2021_D_Shimizu_I_Yomogida_W_Shijun_T_Okada_Exploring_the_Potential_of_Art_Workshop.pdf3,32 MBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons