REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20049
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorLubart, Todd-
    dc.contributor.authorEsposito, Dario-
    dc.contributor.authorGubenko, Alla-
    dc.contributor.authorHoussemand, Claude-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-10T07:59:09Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-10T07:59:09Z-
    dc.date.issued2021-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 23-37pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20049-
    dc.description.abstractThis paper examines three ways that robots can interface with creativity. In particular, social robots which are designed to interact with humans are examined. In the first mode, human creativity can be supported by social robots. In a second mode, social robots can be creative agents and humans serve to support robot’s productions. In the third and final mode, there is complementary action in creative work, which may be collaborative co-creation or a division of labor in creative projects. Illustrative examples are provided and key issues for further discussion are raised.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was prepared in the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: 075-15-2020-928).pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectcreation processpl
    dc.subjecthuman-robot interactionpl
    dc.subjecthuman-robot co-creativitypl
    dc.subjectembodied creativitypl
    dc.subjectsocial robotspl
    dc.titleCreativity in Humans, Robots, Humbotspl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2021 Todd Lubart, Dario Esposito, Alla Gubenko, Claude Houssemand, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2021-0003-
    dc.description.EmailTodd Lubart: todd.lubart@u-paris.frpl
    dc.description.AffiliationTodd Lubart - LaPEA, Université de Paris and Univ. Gustav Eiffel, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France; HSE University, Moscow, Russiapl
    dc.description.AffiliationDario Esposito - LaPEA, Université de Paris and Univ. Gustav Eiffel, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, Francepl
    dc.description.AffiliationAlla Gubenko - Department of Education and Social Work, Institute for Lifelong Learning and Guidance, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourgpl
    dc.description.AffiliationClaude Houssemand - Department of Education and Social Work, Institute for Lifelong Learning and Guidance, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourgpl
    dc.description.referencesAddesi, A.R., & Pachet, F. (2005). Experiences with a musical machine: Musical style replication in 3 to 5 year old children. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 21–46.pl
    dc.description.referencesAli, S., Moroso, T., & Breazeal, C. (2019). Can children learn creativity from a social robot?. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 359–368). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.pl
    dc.description.referencesAlves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Hoffman, G., & Paiva, A. (2016). Boosting children’s creativity through creative interactions with social robots. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 591–592). IEEE.pl
    dc.description.referencesAlves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Paiva, A., & Hoffman, G. (2019). Guide to build YOLO, a creativity-stimulating robot for children. HardwareX, 6, e00074.pl
    dc.description.referencesAlves-Oliveira, P., Chandak, A., Cloutier, I., Kompella, P., Moegenburg, P., & Bastos Pires, AE (2018). Yolo a robot that will make your creativity boom. Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 335–336).pl
    dc.description.referencesAlves-Oliveira, P., Gomes, S., Chandak, A., Arriaga, P., Hoffman, G., & Paiva, A. (2020). Software architecture for YOLO, a creativity-stimulating robot. SoftwareX, 11, 100461.pl
    dc.description.referencesArias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending the Individual Human Mind–Creating Shared Understanding Through Collaborative Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7, 1 (2000), 84–113.pl
    dc.description.referencesAsada, M., Hosoda, K., Kuniyoshi, Y., Ishiguro, H., Inui, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Ogino, M. & Yoshida, C. (2009). Cognitive developmental robotics: A survey. IEEE Trans. on Autonomous Mental Development, 1(1), 12–34.pl
    dc.description.referencesBelpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics, 3(21), eaat5954.pl
    dc.description.referencesBretan, M., & Weinberg, G. (2016). A survey of robotic musicianship. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 100-109.pl
    dc.description.referencesBruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCalinon, S., Guenter, F., & Billard, A. (2005). Goal-directed imitation in a humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 299–304). IEEE.pl
    dc.description.referencesCalinon, S., Li, Z., Alizadeh, T., Tsagarakis, N.G., & Caldwell, D.G. (2012). Teaching of bimanual skills in a compliant humanoid robot. In Intl Workshop on Human-Friendly Robotics (HFR).pl
    dc.description.referencesCangelosi, A. & Schlesinger, M. (2018). From babies to robots: the contribution of developmental robotics to developmental psychology. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3):183–188.pl
    dc.description.referencesChen, H., Park, H.W., & Breazeal, C. (2020). Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotional engagement. Computers & Education, 150, 103836.pl
    dc.description.referencesChung, S. (2019). Drawing Operations, 2015.pl
    dc.description.referencesCropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesDautenhahn, K., & Billard, A. (1999). Bringing up robots or – the psychology of socially intelligent robots: from theory to implementation. In Proceedings of Autonomous Agents (pp. 366–367). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.pl
    dc.description.referencesDautenhahn, K., Ogden, B., & Quick, T. (2002). From embodied to socially embedded agents – implications for interaction-aware robots. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 397–428.pl
    dc.description.referencesDautenhahn K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 362(1480), 679–704.pl
    dc.description.referencesDavis, N.M., Popova, Y., Sysoev, I., Hsiao, C.P., Zhang, D., & Magerko, B. (2014). Building Artistic Computer Colleagues with an Enactive Model of Creativity. In ICCC (pp. 38–45).pl
    dc.description.referencesDe Graaf, M.M.A., Allouch, S.B., & Klamer, T. (2015). Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030pl
    dc.description.referencesDuffy, B.R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00374-3pl
    dc.description.referencesEngeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.pl
    dc.description.referencesEngeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Activity theory: A well-kept secret. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesFitzgerald, T., Goel, A.K., & Thomaz, A. (2017). Human-Robot Co-Creativity: Task Transfer on a Spectrum of Similarity. In ICCC (pp. 104–111).pl
    dc.description.referencesFong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn K. (2002). A survey of socially interactive robots: concepts,design, and applications. Technical Report No. CMU-RI-TR-02-29. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.pl
    dc.description.referencesGazeau, J.P., & Zeghloul, S. (2012). The artist robot: A robot drawing like a human artist. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (pp. 486–491). IEEE.pl
    dc.description.referencesGibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaumpl
    dc.description.referencesGlăvenau, V.P. (2012). What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects and the theory of affordances. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.13pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăvenau, V.P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: the five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V.P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E.P., Corazza, G.E., ... & Sternberg, R.J. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745.pl
    dc.description.referencesGordon, G., Breazeal, C., & Engel, S. (2015). Can children catch curiosity from a social robot?. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 91–98).pl
    dc.description.referencesGubenko, A., Kirsch, C., Smilek, J.N., Lubart, T., & Houssemand, C. (2021). Educational Robotics and Robot Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8(178).pl
    dc.description.referencesGuerin, F., Ferreira, P. (2019). Robot Manipulation in Open Environments: New Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental System, 12(3), (pp. 669–675).pl
    dc.description.referencesHoffmann, O. (2016). On Modeling Human-Computer Co-Creativity. In S. Kunifuji, G.A. Papadopoulos, A.M.J. Skulimowski, & J. Kacprzyk, (Eds.), Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems (pp. 37–48). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesHoffman, G., & Weinberg, G. (2011). Interactive improvisation with a robotic marimba player. Autonomous Robots, 31(2–3), 133–153.pl
    dc.description.referencesHöflich, J.R., & El Bayed, A. (2015). Perception, Acceptance, and the Social Construction of Robots—Exploratory Studies. Social Robots from a Human Perspective, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-156729_4pl
    dc.description.referencesHutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesJones, R.A. (2017). What makes a robot ‘social’? Social Studies of Science, 47(4), 556–579.pl
    dc.description.referencesKahn Jr, P.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N.G., Severson, R.L., Gill, B.T., ... & Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental psychology, 48(2), 303.pl
    dc.description.referencesKahn, P.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B.T., Shen, S., Ruckert, J.H., & Gary, H.E. (2016). Human creativity can be facilitated through interacting with a social robot. In 2016 11th ACM / IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 173–180). IEEE.pl
    dc.description.referencesKantosalo, A., Falk, M., & Jordanous, A. (2021). Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8(190).pl
    dc.description.referencesKato, I., Ohteru, S., Shirai, K., Matsushima, T., Narita, S., Sugano, S., ... & Fujisawa, E. (1987). The robot musician ‘wabot-2’ (waseda robot-2). Robotics, 3(2), (pp. 143-155).pl
    dc.description.referencesLeont’ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.pl
    dc.description.referencesLeite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013). Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0178-ypl
    dc.description.referencesLindblom, J., & Ziemke, T. (2003), Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vygotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behavior, 11, 79–96.pl
    dc.description.referencesLuo, RC, & Liu, YJ (2018). Robot Artist Performs Cartoon Style Facial Portrait Painting. In 2018 IEEE / RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 7683–7688). IEEE.pl
    dc.description.referencesLungarella, M., Metta, G., Pfeifer, R., & Sandini, G. (2004). Developmental robotics: a survey. Connection science, 15(4), 151–190.pl
    dc.description.referencesMacDorman, K.F. (2019). La Vallée de l’Étrange de Mori Masahiro. e-Phaïstos, (VII-2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ephaistos.5333pl
    dc.description.referencesMagnenat-Thalmann, N., Yuan, J., Thalmann, D., & You, B.-J. (Eds.). (2016). Context Aware Human-Robot and Human-Agent Interaction. Human–Computer Interaction Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-31919947-4pl
    dc.description.referencesMin, H., Yi, C., Luo, R., Zhu, J. & Bi, S. (2016). Affordance research in developmental robotics: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 8(4), 237–255.pl
    dc.description.referencesMitchell, M. (2021). Why AI is Harder Than We Think. In: arXiv: 2104.12871pl
    dc.description.referencesMori, M., MacDorman, K., & Kageki, N. (2012). The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2012.2192811pl
    dc.description.referencesOECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030–Conceptual learning framework–Concept note: Student agency for 2030. Paris: Editions OECD.pl
    dc.description.referencesOECD (2021). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021 : Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Robots. Paris: Editions OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-enpl
    dc.description.referencesOliveira, P.A. (2020). Boosting children’s creativity through creative interactions with social robots. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348293686_Boosting_Children’s_Creativity_through_Creative_Interactions_with_Social_Robotspl
    dc.description.referencesOtero, N., Saunders, J., Dautenhahn, K., & Nehaniv, C.L. (2008). Teaching robot companions: the role of scaffolding and event structuring. Connection Science, 20(2–3), 111–134.pl
    dc.description.referencesPachet, F. (2003). The continuator: Musical interaction with style. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3), 333-341.pl
    dc.description.referencesPakrasi, I., Chakraborty, N., Cuan, C., Berl, E., Rizvi, W., & LaViers, A. (2018). Dancing droids: an expressive layer for mobile robots developed within choreographic practice. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 410-420). Springer, Cham.pl
    dc.description.referencesPan, Y., Kim, MG, & Suzuki, K. (2010). A Robot Musician Interacting with a Human Partner through Initiative Exchange. In NIME (pp. 166-169).pl
    dc.description.referencesPark, H.W., Rosenberg-Kima, R., Rosenberg, M., Gordon, G., & Breazeal, C. (2017). Growing growth mindset with a social robot peer. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 137-145).pl
    dc.description.referencesPark, H.W., Grover, I., Spaulding, S., Gomez, L., & Breazeal, C. (2019). A model-free affective reinforcement learning approach to personalization of an autonomous social robot companion for early literacy education. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 33, No. 01, pp. 687–694).pl
    dc.description.referencesPeng, H., Zhou, C., Hu, H., Chao, F., & Li, J. (2015). Robotic dance in social robotics — a taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(3), 281–293.pl
    dc.description.referencesResnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., & Teasley, S.D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. American Psychological Association.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.pl
    dc.description.referencesRussell, S.J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence-A Modern Approach (3. internat. ed.). Pearson Education.pl
    dc.description.referencesSaerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., & Janse, M.D. (2010, April). Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 10 (pp. 1613–1622).pl
    dc.description.referencesSandry, E. (2017). Creative collaborations with machines. Philosophy & Technology, 30(3), 305–319.pl
    dc.description.referencesSmith, G. F. (1998). Idea-generation techniques: A formulary of active ingredients. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(2), 107–134.pl
    dc.description.referencesSmith L.B., & Gasser M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13–30.pl
    dc.description.referencesSuzuki, K., & Hashimoto, S. (2004). Robotic interface for embodied interaction via dance and musical performance. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(4), 656–671.pl
    dc.description.referencesThrun, S., Hähnel, D., Ferguson, D., Montemerlo, M., Triebel, R., Burgard, W., Baker, C., Omohundro, Z., Thayer, S., & Whittaker, W. (2003). A system for volumetric robotic mapping of abandoned mines. In 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 3I(10) (pp. 4270–4275).pl
    dc.description.referencesThrun, S. (2004). Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1–2), 9–24.pl
    dc.description.referencesToubia, O., Berger, J., & Eliashberg, J. (2021). How quantifying the shape of stories predicts their success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26).pl
    dc.description.referencesTresset, P., & Leymarie, FF (2013). Portrait drawing by Paul the robot. Computers & Graphics, 37(5), 348–363.pl
    dc.description.referencesU.N. and I.F.R.R. (2002). United Nations and The International Federation of Robotics. World Robotics 2002. New York–Geneva: United Nations.pl
    dc.description.referencesVentura, D. (2016, June). Mere generation: Essential barometer or dated concept. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 17-24). Paris: Sony CSL.pl
    dc.description.referencesWeinberg, G., Driscoll, S., & Parry, M. (2005, August). Musical interactions with a perceptual robotic percussionist. In ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005 (pp. 456-461). IEEE.pl
    dc.description.referencesZagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2015). Learning to compare image patches via convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 4353-4361).pl
    dc.description.referencesZlatev, J. (2001). The epigenesis of meaning in human beings, and possibly in robots. Minds and Machines, 11, 155–195.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume8pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage23pl
    dc.description.lastpage37pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_8_1_2021_T_Lubart_D_Esposito_A_Gubenko_C_Houssemand_Creativity_in_Humans_Robots_Humbots.pdf1,01 MBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons