REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20048
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorBasu, Marina-
    dc.contributor.authorBeghetto, Ronald A.-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-10T07:58:47Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-10T07:58:47Z-
    dc.date.issued2021-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 11-22pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20048-
    dc.description.abstractHow might technology mediate the transition from primary creative expression to secondary creative contributions? In this paper, we address this question by expanding upon recent conceptualizations of primary and secondary creativity (Runco & Beghetto, 2019) and offer a new way to understand how technology can support creative learning and creative expression. We open by providing a conceptual overview of how technology can serve as a mediator between primary and secondary creativity. We then provide a concrete example of how material artifacts of students’ creative expression (primary creativity) were digitized into artifacts, and in turn, transformed again into material creative contributions in the form of narrative volumes (secondary creativity). We also discuss how technology can be used to mediate continuous creative contributions beyond primary and secondary creativity and how creativity researchers can (re)conceptualize the role technology can play in supporting indefinite cycles of creative learning and expression from material to digital and back again.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectcreative learningpl
    dc.subjectprimary and secondary creativitypl
    dc.subjectsocio-materialitypl
    dc.subjecttechnologypl
    dc.subjectcontinuous creativitypl
    dc.titleTechnology as Social-Material Mediator: From Primary to Secondary Creativity and Beyondpl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2021 Marina Basu, Ronald A. Beghetto, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2021-0002-
    dc.description.EmailMarina Basu: mbasu3@asu.edpl
    dc.description.EmailRonauld A. Beghetto: Ronald.Beghetto@asu.edupl
    dc.description.AffiliationMarina Basu - Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USApl
    dc.description.AffiliationRonald A. Beghetto - Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USApl
    dc.description.referencesAnderson, D.R. (1987). Creativity and the philosophy of C.S. Peirce. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.pl
    dc.description.referencesBasu, M. (in press). Krishnamurti’s Insights on Observation for Global Childhood Education and Research. In N.J. Yelland, L. Peters, N. Fairchild, M. Tesar & M.S. Perez (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Global Childhoods (pp. 219–233). Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R.A. (2019). Abductive reasoning and the genesis of new ideas: Charles S. Peirce. In V. P. Glaveanu (Ed.), Creativity Reader. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R.A. (in press). Engaging uncertainty: Principles and provocations for promoting creative learning futures. In D. Henriksen & P. Mishra (Eds.), Creative provocations: Speculations on the future of creativity, technology & learning. Switzerland: Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R.A., & Vasquez, A.M. (in press). Creative learning: A pedagogical perspective. In L.J. Ball & F. Vallee-Tourangeau (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Creative Cognition. New York: Routledgepl
    dc.description.referencesBoden, M. (1998). Computer Models of Creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 351–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.020pl
    dc.description.referencesCorazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 258–267.pl
    dc.description.referencesGiaccardi, E., & Candy, L. (2009). Creativity and cognition 2007: Materialities of Creativity. Leonardo, 42(3), 194–196.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V.P. (2012), What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects, and the theory of affordances. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.13pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V.P. (2015). The status of the social in creativity studies and the pitfalls of dichotomic thinking. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0016pl
    dc.description.referencesHenriksen, D., & P. Mishra (Eds.). (in press). Creative provocations: Speculations on the future of creativity, technology & learning. Switzerland: Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesHenriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37.pl
    dc.description.referencesRothenberg, A. (2014). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco M.A. (2019) Creativity as a Dynamic, Personal, Parsimonious Process. In: Beghetto R., Corazza G. (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity. Creativity theory and action in education, vol. 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_10pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M.A. & Beghetto, R.A. (2018). Primary and secondary creativity. Behavioral Sciences, 27, 7–10.pl
    dc.description.referencesSternberg, R.J.(2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10pl
    dc.description.referencesStokes, P.D. (2010). Using constraints to develop creativity in the classroom. In R.A. Beghetto & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 88–112). Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesTanggaard, L. (2013). The sociomateriality of creativity in everyday life. Culture & Psychology, 19, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12464987pl
    dc.description.referencesTanggaard, L., & Beghetto, R.A. (2015). Ideational pathways: Toward a new approach for studying the life of ideas. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0017pl
    dc.description.referencesTreadaway, C. (2009). Materiality, memory and imagination: Using empathy to research creativity. Leonardo, 42(3), 231–203.pl
    dc.description.referencesVallée-Tourangeau, F., & March, P.L. (2019). Insight Out: Making Creativity Visible. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 824–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.409pl
    dc.description.referencesWertsch, J.V., Del Rio, P., Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesZiegler, R., & Diehl, M. (1998). Computer supported idea generation. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 351–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume8pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage11pl
    dc.description.lastpage22pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2021, Vol. 8, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_8_1_2021_M_Basu_R_A_Beghetto_Technology_as_Social-Material_Mediator.pdf2,83 MBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons