REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2020, Vol. 7, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20044
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorSchoch, Kerstin-
    dc.contributor.authorOstermann, Thomas-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-04-10T06:53:33Z-
    dc.date.available2026-04-10T06:53:33Z-
    dc.date.issued2020-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 2020, pp. 373-410pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20044-
    dc.descriptionThe authors gratefully acknowledge Thomas Gengenbach for providing theoretical and practical support regarding IT, implementation of the online survey, and data structuring. Many thanks to Ina Blümel for being a great mentor in conducting this study as part of the Open Science Fellows Program. Thanks also to Rebecca Kahn for the feedback on the manuscript.pl
    dc.description.abstractIn empirical art psychology and creativity research most studies focus on the psychological correlates of art. Only few go beyond treating artworks as categorical data (e.g. abstract vs. representational) and consider artworks in detail. In part this is due to the lack of reliable quantitative measurements. The rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works (RizbA) makes a difference to current research designs. The current study validates the questionnaire on a representative sample of contemporary visual art, consisting of 318 images depicting works by artists from different cultural areas dated to the 21st century. In a randomized test-retest design, the pictorial material was rated by 506 (T1) and 238 (T2) art experts using RizbA. Statistical quality criteria, such as item difficulty, capacity of differentiation, test-retest reliability, and intraclass correlation were calculated. Principal component analysis (PCA) and indices of factor similarity were computed. The overall test’s capacity for differentiation yields partial eta-squared of .31 (T1) and .40 (T2). Test-retest reliability is .86. PCA reveals an eight-factor solution, which is largely consistent across both measurement points. Tucker’s coefficient of congruence ranges between |.71| and |1.00|. Intraclass correlation coefficients are .86 (T1) and .73 (T2). This study indicates generalizability of the questionnaire to contemporary artworks. Although a conclusion on the factors’ structure cannot be drawn yet, results are very promising. As the first reliable quantitative tool for formal picture analysis, RizbA allows more detailedexamination of visual art and its psychological correlates. This broadens research methodology by giving art greater weight in art psychology and creativity research.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Open Science Fellows Program by Wikimedia Germany, Stifterverband and VolkswagenStiftung.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectContemporary artpl
    dc.subjectFormal picture analysispl
    dc.subjectPsychometricspl
    dc.subjectQuestionnairepl
    dc.subjectVisual artpl
    dc.titleGiving the Art Greater weight in Art Psychology: RizbA, a Questionnaire for Formal Picture Analysispl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2021 Kerstin Schoch, Thomas Ostermann, published by University of Białystok.pl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2020-0019-
    dc.description.EmailKerstin Schoch: kerstin.schoch@hks-ottersberg.depl
    dc.description.EmailThomas Ostermann: thomas.ostermann@uni-wh.depl
    dc.description.AffiliationKerstin Schoch - University of Applied Sciences and Arts Ottersberg, Germany Witten/ Herdecke University, Germanypl
    dc.description.AffiliationThomas Ostermann - Witten/ Herdecke University, Germanypl
    dc.description.referencesBaltes-Götz, B. (2013). Behandlung fehlender Werte in SPSS und Amos [Dealing with missing values in SPSS and Amos]. Universität Trier.pl
    dc.description.referencesBelting, H., Dilly, H., Kemp, W., Sauerländer, W., & Warnke, M. (1996). Kunstgeschichte: Eine Einführung [Art history: An introduction]. In H. Belting, H. Dilly, W. Kemp, W. Sauerländer, & M. Warnke (Eds.) (6th ed.). Reimer.pl
    dc.description.referencesBrown, J. D. (2009). Principal components analysis and exploratory factor analysis: Definitions, differences, and choices. Statistics, 13(1).pl
    dc.description.referencesCampbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81.pl
    dc.description.referencesCattaneo, M. (1994). Addressing culture and values in the training of art therapists. Art Therapy, 11(3), 184-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1994.10759081pl
    dc.description.referencesChan, W., Ho, R. M., Leung, K., Chan, D. K.-S., & Yung, Y.-F. (1999). An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods, 4(4), 378.pl
    dc.description.referencesChatterjee, A., Widick, P., Sternschein, R., Smith, W. B., & Bromberger, B. (2010). The assessment of art attributes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.fpl
    dc.description.referencesCliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31(1), 33-42.pl
    dc.description.referencesCohen, B. M., & Mills, A. (2015). The Diagnostic Drawing Series (DDS) at thirty: Art therapy assessment and research. In D. Gussak & R. M Rosal, The Wiley handbook of art therapy (p. 558-568). Wiley-Blackwell.pl
    dc.description.referencesCohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.pl
    dc.description.referencesColver, M. C., & El-Alayli, A. (2016). Getting aesthetic chills from music: The connection between openness to experience and frisson. Psychology of Music, 44(3), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615572358pl
    dc.description.referencesCommare, L., Rosenberg, R., & Leder, H. (2018). More than the sum of its parts: Perceiving complexity in painting. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 380. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000186pl
    dc.description.referencesCoster, J. D. (2012). Converting effect sizes. http://www.stat-help.com/spreadsheets.htmlpl
    dc.description.referencesCropley, A. (1997). Creativity: A bundle of paradoxes. Gifted and Talented International, 12(1), 8-14.pl
    dc.description.referencesEpstein, C. (2019). Bildlicher Ausdruck von Depression: Erprobung des Ratinginstruments RizbA an Bildstichproben aus dem klinischen Kunsttherapiesetting [Pictorial expression of depression: Testing the ratinginstrument RizbA on image samples from a clinical art therapy setting]. Witten/Herdecke University. Zenodo database. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3365921pl
    dc.description.referencesFechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik [Preschool of aesthetics] (Vol. 1). Breitkopf & Härtel.pl
    dc.description.referencesFetz, K., Vogt, H., Ostermann, T., Schmitz, A., & Schulz-Quach, C. (2018). Evaluation of the palliative symptom burden score (PSBS) in a specialised palliative care unit of a university medical centrea longitudinal study. BMC palliative care, 17(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0342-0pl
    dc.description.referencesFraiberger, S. P., Sinatra, R., Resch, M., Riedl, C., & Barabási, A.-L. (2018). Quantifying reputation and success in art. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau7224pl
    dc.description.referencesGantt, L. (2016). The Formal Elements Art Therapy Scale (FEATS). In D. Gussak & M. Rosal (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of art therapy (pp. 569-578). Wiley-Blackwell.pl
    dc.description.referencesGLAM Wiki. (2020). GLAM Outreach Wiki: Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums. https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAMpl
    dc.description.referencesGridley, M. C. (2006). Concrete and abstract thinking styles and art preferences in a sample of serious art collectors. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 853-857.pl
    dc.description.referencesGridley, M. C. (2013). Preference for abstract art according to thinking styles and personality. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 463-481.pl
    dc.description.referencesGuadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265-275.pl
    dc.description.referencesHager, M., Hagemann, D., Danner, D., & Schankin, A. (2012). Assessing aesthetic appreciation of visual artworks: The construction of the Art Reception Survey (ARS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 320-333. https://doi.org/10. 1037/a0028776pl
    dc.description.referencesHaller, C. S., & Courvoisier, D. S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017084pl
    dc.description.referencesHanich, J., Wagner, V., Shah, M., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2014). Why we like to watch sad films. The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035690pl
    dc.description.referencesHayn-Leichsenring, G. U., Kenett, Y. N., Schulz, K., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Abstract art paintings, global image properties, and verbal descriptions: An empirical and computational investigation. Acta Psychologica, 202, 102936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102936pl
    dc.description.referencesIshizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PloS One, 6(7), https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0021852.pl
    dc.description.referencesJanßen, B. (2018). Erprobung des Ratinginstruments für zweidimensionale bildnerische Arbeiten (RizbA): Ansatz zu einer möglichen Untersuchung des bildnerischen Ausdrucks von Schmerz in gemalten Bildern von Menschen mit chronischer Schmerzsymptomatik [Testing the rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works (RizbA): Pilot study for investigating pictorial expression in pictures painted by people with chronic pain symptoms]. HKS – University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Ottersberg. Zenodo database. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3407808pl
    dc.description.referencesJerusalem, J. L. L. (2020, February 20). Rizba für alle: Überprüfung der Einsatzmöglich-keiten eines Ratinginstruments für zweidimensionale bildnerische Arbeiten (RizbA) und des neu dazu erstellten Manuals [Rizba for everyone: Review of the possible uses of a rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works (RizbA) and the new-ly created manual]. Witten/Herdecke University, Witten. Open Science Framework. https:/doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FVJZMpl
    dc.description.referencesKoo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012pl
    dc.description.referencesLeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815-852. https://doi.org/0.1177/1094428106296642pl
    dc.description.referencesLeder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489-508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811pl
    dc.description.referencesLeder, H., Gerger, G., Dressler, S. G., & Schabmann, A. (2012). How art is appreciated. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026396pl
    dc.description.referencesLeder, H., Tinio, P. P., Brieber, D., Kröner, T., Jacobsen, T., & Rosenberg, R. (2018). Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 37(1), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418777941pl
    dc.description.referencesLee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2009). The HEXACO Personality Inventory - Revised: A measure of the six major dimensions of personality. http://hexaco.orgpl
    dc.description.referencesLeiner, D. (2018). SoSci Survey. https://www.soscisurvey.depl
    dc.description.referencesLevine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 612-625.pl
    dc.description.referencesLin, T. H. (2010). A comparison of multiple imputation with EM algorithm and MCMC method for quality of life missing data. Quality & Quantity, 44(2), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9196-5pl
    dc.description.referencesLorenzo-Seva, U., & Ten Berge, J. M. (2006). Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57-64. https://doi.org/10. 1027/1614-1881.2.2.57pl
    dc.description.referencesMaclagan, D. (1999). Getting the feel: Problems of research in the fields of psychological aesthetics and art therapy - The struggle with incarnation & the negative sublime. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 5(26), 303-311.pl
    dc.description.referencesMarengo, L., Fazekas, G., & Tombros, A. (2017). The Interaction of Casual Users with Digital Collections of Visual Art. An Exploratory Study of the WikiArt Website. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesMartindale, C. (2007). Recent trends in the psychological study of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.2190/B637-1041-2635-16NNpl
    dc.description.referencesMcCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa Jr, P. T., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552.pl
    dc.description.referencesMcGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30. https://doi.org/1082-989X/96/S3.00pl
    dc.description.referencesMenninghaus, W., Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Sounds funny? Humor effects of phonological and prosodic figures of speech. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035309pl
    dc.description.referencesMenninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2018). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychological Review, 126(2), 171-195. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135pl
    dc.description.referencesMersch, D. (2019). Ästhetisches Denken: Kunst als Theoria [Aesthetic thinking: Art as theoria]. In D. Mersch, S. Sasse, & S. Zanetti (Eds.), Ästhetische Theorie [Aesthetic theory] (pp. 241-259). Diaphanes.pl
    dc.description.referencesMills, A. (2003). The diagnostic drawing series. In C. Malchiodi (Ed.), The handbook of art therapy (p. 401-209).pl
    dc.description.referencesMohammad, S. M., & Kiritchenko, S. (2018). Wikiart emotions: An annotated dataset of emotions evoked by art. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2018).pl
    dc.description.referencesMoosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2007). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Test theory and questionnaire design] (2nd ed.). Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesMoshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2014). Faktorenstruktur, psychometrische Ei-genschaften und Messinvarianz der deutschsprachigen Version des 60-item HEXA-CO Persönlichkeitsinventars [Factor structure, psychometric characteristics and measurement invariance of the German version of the 60-item HEXACO personality inventory]. Diagnostica. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000112pl
    dc.description.referencesMosquera, G. (1992). The Marco Polo syndrome: Some problems around art and Eurocentrism. Third Text, 6(21), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528829208576382pl
    dc.description.referencesNadal, M., Munar, E., Marty, G., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2010). Visual complexity and beauty appreciation: Explaining the divergence of results. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.dpl
    dc.description.referencesO’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396-402.pl
    dc.description.referencesO’Connor, B. P. (2018). SPSS, SAS, and MATLAB programs for determining the number of components and factors using parallel analysis and velicer’s MAP test. https://people.ok.ubc.ca/brioconn/nfactors/nfactors.htmlpl
    dc.description.referencesOsborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(11), 8.pl
    dc.description.referencesOsborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2009). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 12(2), 131-146.pl
    dc.description.referencesPelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003pl
    dc.description.referencesPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics. (2019). Resources. https://neuroaesthetics.med.up enn.edu/research.html - resourcespl
    dc.description.referencesPigott, T. D. (2001). A review of methods for missing data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(4), 353-383.pl
    dc.description.referencesRaykov, T., & Little, T. D. (1999). A note on procrustean rotation in exploratory factor analysis: A computer intensive approach to goodness-of-fit evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 47-57.pl
    dc.description.referencesRubin, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 473-489.pl
    dc.description.referencesSchafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(4), 545-571.pl
    dc.description.referencesSchoch, K. (2014, February 25). Ratinginstrument für zweidimensionale bildnerische Arbeiten: Methodische Arbeit zur Entwicklung eines psychologischen Tests zur Erfassung von bildnerischem Ausdruck [Rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works: Methodical development of a psychological test measuring pictorial expression]. University of Mannheim. Zenodo database. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1479744pl
    dc.description.referencesSchoch, K., Gruber, H., & Ostermann, T. (2017). Measuring art: Methodical development of a quantitative rating instrument measuring pictorial expression (RizbA). The Arts in Psychotherapy, 55, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2017.04.014pl
    dc.description.referencesSchoch, K., & Ostermann, T. (under review). Psychometrics of art: Validation of RizbA, a quantitative rating instrument for pictorial expression.pl
    dc.description.referencesSchönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31(1), 1-10.pl
    dc.description.referencesShrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420.pl
    dc.description.referencesSilvia, P. J. (2007). An introduction to multilevel modeling for research on the psychology of art and creativity. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(1), 1-20.pl
    dc.description.referencesSilvia, P. J., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2011). On personality and piloerection: Individual differences in aesthetic chills and other unusual aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 208. https://doi.org/0.1037/a0021914pl
    dc.description.referencesSimon, H., & Verstegen, U. (2004). prometheus: Das verteilte digitale Bildarchiv für Forschung und Lehre. Neuartige Werkzeuge zur Bereitstellung von verteiltem Content für Wissenschaft und Forschung [prometheus: Digital image database for research and education. New tools for providing shared content for science and research]. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 247-257.pl
    dc.description.referencesSpecht, S. M. (2007). Successive contrast effects for judgments of abstraction in artwork following minimal pre-exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(1), 63-70.pl
    dc.description.referencesStreb, J. H. (1984). Thoughts on phenomenology, education, and art. Studies in Art Education, 25(3), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.1984.11650370pl
    dc.description.referencesStuhler-Bauer, A., & Elbing, U. (2003). Die phänomenologische Bilderfassung: Ein kunsttherapeutisches Instrument. [The phenomenological picture survey: An art therapeutic instrument]. Musik-, Tanz- und Kunsttherapie, 14, 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1026/ 0933-6885.14.1.32pl
    dc.description.referencesSuhr, D. D. (2005). Principal Component Analysis vs. Exploratory Factor Analysis. Proceedings of the thirtieth annual SAS® users group international conference, 203, 30.pl
    dc.description.referencesSuhr, D. D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? Statistics and Data Analysis, 31.pl
    dc.description.referencesSullivan, P., & McCarthy, J. (2009). An experiential account of the psychology of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014292pl
    dc.description.referencesTinio, P. P. (2013). From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10. 1037/a0030872pl
    dc.description.referencesTröndle, M., & Tschacher, W. (2012). The physiology of phenomenology: The effects of artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 30(1), 75-113.pl
    dc.description.referencesTucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.pl
    dc.description.referencesWalter, S., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17(1), 101-110.pl
    dc.description.referencesWassiliwizky, E., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2015). Art-elicited chills indicate states of being moved. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 405. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000023pl
    dc.description.referencesWünsch, K. L. (2016). Comparing two groups’ factor structures: Pearson r and the coefficient of congruence. http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/MV/FA/FactorStructure-TwoGroups.docxpl
    dc.description.referencesWundt, W. M. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Characteristics of physiological psychology] (Vol. 1). Engelman.pl
    dc.description.referencesZaidel, D. W., Nadal, M., Flexas, A., & Munar, E. (2013). An evolutionary approach to art and aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028797pl
    dc.description.referencesZumbo, B. D., Sireci, S. G., & Hambleton, R. K. (2003). Re-visiting exploratory methods for construct comparability: Is there something to be gained from the ways of old. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education (NCME), Chicago, Illinois.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume7pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage373pl
    dc.description.lastpage410pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2020, Vol. 7, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_7_2_2020_K_Schoch_T_Ostermann_Giving_the_Art_Greater_weight_in_Art_Psychology.pdf743,62 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons