REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/20038
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorBonetto, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorPichot, Nicolas-
dc.contributor.authorPavani, Jean-Baptiste-
dc.contributor.authorAdam-Troïan, Jaïs-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-09T07:25:57Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-09T07:25:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 2020, pp. 309-320pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/20038-
dc.description.abstractIf the importance of social psychological factors in creativity has been widely emphasized, research across the social sciences mainly focused on identifying contextual factors that increase or decrease individuals’ creative behaviors. Few studies have investigated the relationships between creativity and individual characteristics related to interpersonal and social interactions. The present contribution aimed to consider such characteristics, namely social risk-taking (i.e., willingness to challenge norms) and fear of negative evaluation (i.e., apprehension about receiving negative judgments of others). Two correlational studies were therefore implemented in order to clarify previous research suggesting that creativity would be positively associated with social risk-taking and to extend them by testing potential associations between creativity and fear of negative evaluation. Using self-ratings of creativity, but also creative self-beliefs and creative achievement, we hypothesized that creativity would correlate positively with social risk likelihood and negatively with fear of negative evaluation. As predicted, and replicating previous results, all our measures of creativity correlated positively with social risk-taking. Our results also consistently highlighted a negative association between beliefs in one’s creative capacities (creative self-efficacy) and one’s level of fear of negative evaluation. These findings corroborate the idea according to which creative individuals would be (social) risk-takers. In addition, individuals who are confident in their ability to generate creative productions would be less afraid of negative judgments from others. Several perspectives are proposed, in particular in terms of the intervention designed in order to enhance individuals’ creativity.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
dc.subjectCreativitypl
dc.subjectCreative self-beliefspl
dc.subjectCreative achievementpl
dc.subjectSocial risk-takingpl
dc.subjectFear of negative evaluationpl
dc.titleCreative Individuals are Social Risk-takers: Relationships between Creativity, Social Risk-Taking and Fear of Negative Evaluationspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Eric Bonetto, Nicolas Pichot, Jean-Baptiste Pavani, Jaïs Adam-Troïan, published by University of Białystok.pl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/ctra-2020-0016-
dc.description.EmailEric Bonetto: bonetto.ericbw@gmail.compl
dc.description.EmailNicolas Pichot: nicolas.pichot@univ-amu.frpl
dc.description.EmailJean-Baptiste Pavani: jean-baptiste.PAVANI@univ-amu.frpl
dc.description.EmailJaïs Adam-Troïan: jadam@aus.edupl
dc.description.AffiliationEric Bonetto - Aix Marseille Univ, LPS, Aix-en-Provence, France; Aix Marseille Univ, PSYCLE (Center for Research on the Psychology of Cognition, Language and Emotion), Aix-en-Provence, France; InCIAM (Institute of Creativity and Innovation of Aix-Marseille), Aix-en-Provence, Francepl
dc.description.AffiliationNicolas Pichot - Aix Marseille Univ, PSYCLE (Center for Research on the Psychology of Cognition, Language and Emotion), Aix-en-Provence, France; InCIAM (Institute of Creativity and Innovation of Aix-Marseille), Aix-en-Provence, Francepl
dc.description.AffiliationJean-Baptiste Pavani - Aix Marseille Univ, PSYCLE (Center for Research on the Psychology of Cognition, Language and Emotion), Aix-en-Provence, Francepl
dc.description.AffiliationJaïs Adam-Troïan - American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emiratespl
dc.description.referencesAcar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2019). Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13, 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000231pl
dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1996/2018). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.pl
dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001pl
dc.description.referencesAmerican Psychological Association (APA). (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspxpl
dc.description.referencesBatey, M., & Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.014pl
dc.description.referencesBen-Zur, H., & Zeidner, M. (2009). Threat to life and risk-taking behaviors: A review of empirical findings and explanatory models. Personality and Social Psychology Re-view, 13, 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308330104pl
dc.description.referencesBlais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision making, 1, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1037/t13084-000pl
dc.description.referencesBonetto, E., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.-B., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2021). The paradox of creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100820pl
dc.description.referencesCarleton, R. N., Collimore, K. C., & Asmundson, G. J. (2007). Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: Construct validity of the BFNE-II. Journal of Anxiety Disor-ders, 21, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.010pl
dc.description.referencesCarson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4pl
dc.description.referencesCode de déontologie des psychologues (CNCDP) [Code of Ethics of Psychologists]. (1996, Amended February, 2012). http://www.cncdp.fr/index.php/code-de-deontologie/code-de-deontologie-2012pl
dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (2015). The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. New York, NY: Springer.pl
dc.description.referencesDellas, M. & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: the individual. Psychol.Bull. 73, 55–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028446pl
dc.description.referencesDollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00828.xpl
dc.description.referencesFunder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202pl
dc.description.referencesFurnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023pl
dc.description.referencesGough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1398pl
dc.description.referencesGuilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.pl
dc.description.referencesHaig, B. D. (2003). What is a spurious correlation?. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 2, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0202_03pl
dc.description.referencesHaslam, S. A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 384-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498001pl
dc.description.referencesHazel, M., Keaten, J., & Kelly, L. (2014). The relationship between personality temperament, communication reticence, and fear of negative evaluation. Communication Research Reports, 31, 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.963219pl
dc.description.referencesHsu, M. L., Hou, S. T., & Fan, H. L. (2011). Creative self‐efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.xpl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 547-558. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.513pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Current perspectives in social and behavioral sciences. Creativity and reason in cognitive development (p. 302–326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941969.016pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., ... & Benedek, M. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000035pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self‐efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter?. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 215-232. https://doi.org/10. 1002/jocb.32pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156pl
dc.description.referencesKim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473pl
dc.description.referencesLeary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283093007pl
dc.description.referencesLucas, B. J., & Nordgren, L. F. (2020). The creative cliff illusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 19830-19836. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 2005620117pl
dc.description.referencesMumford, M. D. (2012). Handbook of Organizational Creativity. London, UK: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesPuente-Díaz, R., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Creative self-beliefs and their implications for creativity and innovation. In A. Brem, R. Puente-Díaz, & M. Agogué (Eds.), The Role of Creativity in the Management of Innovation: State of the Art and Future Research Outlook (pp.149-158). London, UK: World Scientific.pl
dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A., Abdulla, A. M., Paek, S. H., Al-Jasim, F. A., & Alsuwaidi, H. N. (2016). Which test of divergent thinking is best?. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 3, 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0001pl
dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24, 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092pl
dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393-400. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesTyagi, V., Hanoch, Y., Hall, S. D., Runco, M., & Denham, S. L. (2017). The risky side of creativity: Domain specific risk taking in creative individuals. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00145pl
dc.description.referencesWatts, L. L., Steele, L. M., & Song, H. (2017). Re-examining the relationship between need for cognition and creativity: Predicting creative problem solving across multiple domains. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400 419.2017.1263505pl
dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
dc.description.volume7pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage309pl
dc.description.lastpage320pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2020, Vol. 7, Issue 2

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons