REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19979
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorO’Shea, Amanda-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-01T11:10:29Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-01T11:10:29Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPolish Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 2 (72), 2019, pp. 64-78pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19979-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes a multi-case study which linked conceptions and practices of assessment for learning to developing learner autonomy within UK primary mathematics classrooms. The project explored the use of assessment for learning in mathematics lessons with Year 5 (9–10 years old) children and their teachers. Four cases were studied in depth to understand how conceptions and practices impacted upon autonomy and control for teachers and learners. A typology of assessment for learning in mathematics is proposed, along with what this might mean for both teachers and learners in terms of the balance between control and autonomy. One case in particular, that of teacher Alex, is highlighted as it exemplified the expert teacher through the conceptions and use of assessment for learning, which led to the children becoming expert learners of mathematics. The class ethos was one of value for personal autonomy. Responsibility and control of learning was a shared endeavour within a community of learners. Community in this respect was broadened to include the environment and resources within the classroom and so demonstrated learners working within an expert classroom. This article was developed from a paper first presented at the ICME 13 conference (O’Shea, 2016).pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl
dc.subjectassessment for learningpl
dc.subjectformative assessmentpl
dc.subjectself-regulationpl
dc.subjectlearner autonomypl
dc.subjectcase studypl
dc.subjectlearning as inquirypl
dc.subjectcompliancepl
dc.titleTeachers’ Conceptions of Assessment for Learning: What are the Implications for Children?pl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Amanda O’Shea, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/poljes-2019-0005-
dc.description.EmailAmanda.oshea@northampton.ac.ukpl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Northampton, UKpl
dc.description.referencesAskew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy: Report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency. Report for University of London (London).pl
dc.description.referencesBandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.pl
dc.description.referencesBassey, M. (1999). Case Study Research in Educational Settings. Maidenhead: Open University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBERA (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (4th ed.). Retrieved from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/ethical-guidelines-201pl
dc.description.referencesBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. London: King’s College School of Education.pl
dc.description.referencesBlack, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.pl
dc.description.referencesCowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137–151.pl
dc.description.referencesDam, L., Eriksson, R., Gabrielsen, G., Little, D. Miliander, J., & Trebbi, T. (1990). Autonomysteps towards a definition. In T. Trebbi (Ed.), Third Nordic Workshop on Developing Autonomous Learning in the FL Classroom. Bergen: University of Bergen.pl
dc.description.referencesDweck, C.S., & Master, A. (2008). Self-Theories Motivate Self-Regulated Learning. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.pl
dc.description.referencesEcclestone, K. (2007). Commitment, compliance and comfort zones: the effects of formative assessment on vocational education students’ learning careers. Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practices, 14(3), 315–333.pl
dc.description.referencesHargreaves, E. (2005). Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 213–224.pl
dc.description.referencesHarris, L. & Brown, G. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365–381.pl
dc.description.referencesHodgen, J., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Mathematics inside the black box: Asssessment for learning in the mathematics classroom. London: King’s College School of Education.pl
dc.description.referencesJames, M. (2007). Unlocking transformative practice within and beyond the classroom: Messages for practice and policy. In M. James, R. Mccormick, P. Black, P. Carmichael, M. Drummond, A. Fox, J. Macbeath, B. Marshall, D. Pedder, R. Procter, S. Swaffield, J. Swann, & D. Wiliam (Eds.), Improving Learning How to Learn: Classrooms, schools and networks. London: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesKlenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: an Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 263–268.pl
dc.description.referencesMarshall, B., & Drummond, M.J. (2006). How teachers engage with Assessment for Learning: lessons for the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.pl
dc.description.referencesO’Shea, A. (2016). Exemplifying the Expert Primary Mathematics Classroom: The Case of Alex and Assessment for Learning. 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Hamburg, July 24th–31st: ICME.pl
dc.description.referencesPerrenoud, P. (1998). From Formative Evaluation to a Controlled Regulation of Learning Processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 85–102.pl
dc.description.referencesPintrich, P.R., & Zusho, A. (2002). What Do I Need To Succeed? The Development Of Academic Self-Regulation: The Role Of Cognitive and Motivational Factors. In A. Wigfield & J. Accles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation. California: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesRyan R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2006) Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1585.pl
dc.description.referencesSaldaña, S. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.pl
dc.description.referencesSinclair, B., McGrath, I., & Lamb, T. (Eds.). (2000). Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions. Harlow: Longman.pl
dc.description.referencesStiggins, R., & Chappuis J. (2005). Using Student-Involved Classroom Assessment to Close Achievement Gaps. Theory into Practice, 44(1), 11–18.pl
dc.description.referencesStobart, G. (2014). The Expert Learner: Challenging the Myth of Ability. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education, Open University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesSwaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449.pl
dc.description.referencesThompson, M. & Wiliam, D. (2007). Tight but loose: A conceptual framework for scaling up school reforms. Paper presented at a Symposium ‘Tight but loose: Scaling up teacher professional development in diverse contexts’ at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, City, April 9–11.pl
dc.description.referencesTorrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294.pl
dc.description.referencesWiliam, D. (2006) Formative Assessment: Getting the Focus Right. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 283–289.pl
dc.description.referencesWillis, J. (2011). Affiliation, Autonomy and Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 399–415.pl
dc.description.referencesYin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2657-3628-
dc.description.volume2 (72)pl
dc.description.firstpage64pl
dc.description.lastpage78pl
dc.identifier.citation2Polish Journal of Educational Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0080-1118-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Polish Journal of Educational Studies 2019, Vol. 2 (72)

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
POLJES_2_72_2019_A_O_Shea_Teachers_Conceptions_of_Assessment_for_Learning.pdf191,57 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons