REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19977
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorElisondo, Romina Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Ana-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-01T10:17:28Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-01T10:17:28Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 6, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 91-111pl
dc.identifier.issn2354-0036-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19977-
dc.description.abstractThe objective is to analyze manifestations of everyday creativity from the perspective of a group of women. We are interested in recovering the voices of the participants to understand constructed meanings regarding the actions, emotions, relations and contexts to unfolding processes of every-day creativity. We conducted a qualitative study, in which 20 Argentine women aged between 21 and 69 years participated. The sampling was not probabilistic, intentional and for convenience. The participants reside in cities of intermediate size, namely Córdoba, San Luis and Mendoza (Argentina). They reported daily, during one week, on the creative activities in which they were engaged in their lives. The process of data collection was done through WhatsApp; participants sent texts, audios, videos and photographs. We codified and analyzed the data with the QDA MINER LITE program. We constructed four categories of analysis: doing creative things; others and creative contexts; emotions in play and creative self-belief. The results indicate that people relate creativity to different types of work (cooking, handicrafts, academic activities, artistic workshops, solving daily problems, etc.). Others play an important role in creativity as the recipients of creative work, collaborative co-workers or helpers that facilitate creative tasks. The development of everyday creative activities is also linked to well-being and positive emotions (pleasure, passion, desire, satisfaction, self-realization and personal expression). We highlight the importance of creative identity as a complex construction of expectations, self-evaluations and metacognitive processes. The research contributes to the understanding of everyday creativity as a factor that promotes health and the empowerment of women.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
dc.subjectEveryday creativitypl
dc.subjectEmotionspl
dc.subjectWell-beingpl
dc.subjectWomenpl
dc.subjectContextspl
dc.titleWomen’s Everyday Creative Activities: a Qualitative Studypl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Romina Cecilia Elisondo, Ana Vargas, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2019-0006-
dc.description.EmailRomina Cecilia Elisondo: relisondo@gmail.compl
dc.description.EmailAna Vargas: ani.vargas983@gmail.compl
dc.description.AffiliationRomina Cecilia Elisondo - Universidad National de Río Cuarto, Argentinapl
dc.description.AffiliationAna Vargas - Universidad National de Río Cuarto, Argentinapl
dc.description.referencesAguilar Rocha, I. (2012). The house, the self and the world. Doctoral Thesis University of Barcelona. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16211268.pdf Retrieved 03 March 2019.pl
dc.description.referencesAmerican Psychological Association's (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf Retrieved 23 December 2018.pl
dc.description.referencesAranguren, M. & Irrazabal, N. (2012). Diseño de una Escala para la evaluación del Comportamiento Creativo en diferentes dominios. Ciencias Psicológicas, 4, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v6i1.60pl
dc.description.referencesAugé, M. (2000). The "non-places", spaces of anonymity: an anthropology of supermodernity. Barcelona: Gedisapl
dc.description.referencesBaer, J. (2015). Domain specificity of creativity. Oxford: Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBaer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105.pl
dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R. & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward Untangling Creative Self-Beliefs In Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, selfefficacy, mindset, and identity. (pp. 3-22). Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Hatcher, R. (2016). Applying Creativity Research to Cooking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(3), 171-177.pl
dc.description.referencesBenedek, M., Bruckdorfer, R., & Jauk, E. (2019) Motives for Creativity: Exploring the What and Why of Everyday Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jocb.396 Retrieved 03 March 2019pl
dc.description.referencesBenedek, M., Jauk, E., Kerschenbauer, K., Anderwald, R., & Grond, L. (2017). Creating art: An experience sampling study in the domain of moving image art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 325-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000102pl
dc.description.referencesConner, T. S., DeYoung, C. G., & Silvia, P. J. (2018). Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(2), 181-189.pl
dc.description.referencesConner, T. & Silvia, P. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463-470.pl
dc.description.referencesDavies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education. A systematic literature review. Thinking skills and creativity, 8, 80-91.pl
dc.description.referencesDiedrich, J., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., Gredlein, J. M., Neubauer, A. C., & Benedek, M. (2017, August 28). Assessment of Real-Life Creativity: The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000137pl
dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. & Donolo, D. (2016). Construcción y análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Acciones Creativas en población argentina. PSIENCIA. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 8(1). http://www.psiencia.org/ojs/index.php/psiencia/article/view/188pl
dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. (2016). Creativity is always a social process. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 3(2), 194-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0013pl
dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. (2018). Procesos creativos de mujeres emprendedoras. Boletín Científico Sapiens Research, 8(1), 41-53.pl
dc.description.referencesFlick, U. (2018). Designing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication.pl
dc.description.referencesGandolfo, E. & Marty, G. (2010). Women doing it forever: the everyday creativity of women craftmakers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art Therapy, 5(1), 29-43.pl
dc.description.referencesGenoe, R. & Liechty, T. (2017). Meanings of participation in a leisure arts pottery programme, World Leisure Journal, 59, 2, 91-104. doi: 10.1080/16078055.2016.1212733pl
dc.description.referencesGlaveanu, V. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69-81. doi: 10.1037/a0029528pl
dc.description.referencesGlaveanu, V. (2014). The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 1, 10-32. doi: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02pl
dc.description.referencesGlaveanu, V. (2017). The creative self in dialogue. In Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. (pp. 117-135). Academic Press.pl
dc.description.referencesGlaveanu, V. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25-32.pl
dc.description.referencesHegarty, C. B. (2009). The value and meaning of creative leisure. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 3(1), 10–13.pl
dc.description.referencesHelfand, M., Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). The Four-C Model of Creativity: Culture and Context. In The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research (pp. 15-36). Palgrave Macmillan UK.pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. (2019). Creative Self-Beliefs. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 396-418). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316979839.021pl
dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2017). From moment-to-moment to day-to-day: Experience sampling and diary investigations in adults’ everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 309-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000127pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298-308. doi: 10.1037/t17613-000pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065-1082.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., & Watson, C. (2016). Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 394–399.pl
dc.description.referencesKozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. (pp. 20-47) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMcCabe, M., & de Waal Malefyt, T. (2015). Creativity and cooking: Motherhood, agency and social change in everyday life. Journal of Consumer Culture, 15(1), 48-65.pl
dc.description.referencesModrzejewska-Świgulska, M. (2018). Professional Competences. Reconstruction of the Opinions of Polish Female Directors. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 5(1), 72-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0005pl
dc.description.referencesPaek, S. & Runco, M. (2017). Dealing with the Criterion Problem by Measuring the Quality and Quantity of Creative Activity and Accomplishment, Creativity Research Journal, 29, 167-173. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2017.1304078pl
dc.description.referencesRichards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity. In Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. (pp. 189-215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesRichardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45-54.pl
dc.description.referencesRubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., & Ridgley, L. M. (2018). Anchoring the creative process within a self-regulated learning framework: Inspiring assessment methods and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 921-945.pl
dc.description.referencesSaid-Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Methodological issues in measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 4(2), 276-301. doi: 10.1515/ctra-2017-0014pl
dc.description.referencesSilvia, P. Wigert, B. Reiter, R. & Kaufman, J. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19-34. doi: 10.1037/a0024071pl
dc.description.referencesSilvia, P.J., Beaty, R.E., Nusbaum, E.C., Eddington, K.M., Levin-Aspenson, H. & Kwapil, T.R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8(2), 183-188. doi: 10.1037/a0035722pl
dc.description.referencesTrnka, R. Zahradnik, M. y Kuška, M. (2016). Emotional Creativity and Real-Life Involvement in Different Types of Creative Leisure Activities. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 348-356.pl
dc.description.referencesTürst, G., & Grin, F. (2018). A comprehensive method for the measurement of everyday creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.007pl
dc.description.referencesUNESCO (2014). Gender equality, heritage and creativity. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000229418 Retrieved 13 March 2019.pl
dc.description.referencesUNESCO (2015). Cultural times The first global map of cultural and creative industries https://en.unesco.org/creativity/sites/creativity/files/cultural_times._the_first_global _map_of_cultural_and_creative_industries.pdf Retrieved 20 December 2018. Accessed 23 February 2019.pl
dc.description.volume6pl
dc.description.issue1pl
dc.description.firstpage91pl
dc.description.lastpage111pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2019, Vol. 6, Issue 1

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Creativity_6_1_2019_R_C_Elisondo_A_Vargas_Women’s_Everyday_Creative_Activities.pdf546,58 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons