REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19974
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorTeszenyi, Eleonora-
dc.contributor.authorDevecchi, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Tanya-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-01T09:46:45Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-01T09:46:45Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPolish Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 2 (72), 2019, pp. 24-44pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19974-
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on a small-scale practitioner enquiry undertaken with 17 workbased learners studying on a two-year Early Years Foundation Degree programme in a higher education institution in England. The first aim of the enquiry was to identify the perspectives of a cohort of work-based Early Years Foundation Degree students on teaching strategies they experienced at a higher education institution in the English midlands. The second aim was to identify how the findings could be applied to curricular and andragogic enhancements for future students. Beliefs and attitudes questionnaires were administered to the students half way through their programme. Findings indicate that students valued strategies that included the direct input of the lecturers they regarded as ‘more knowledgeable others’ (Vygotsky, 1978), yet they rated peer support as less effective for their learning. Findings indicate that early years students’ applications of learned theory to work-based practice may need to go beyond a singular notion of ‘communities of practice’ (Lave & Wenger, 1991). Although these students are positioned and position themselves as more knowledgeable others in their own workplace communities, they regard themselves as lacking knowledge in their higher education community. As members of these various communities, they straddle heutagogic and andragogic approaches in their respective communities of practice. In recognition of this, the paper argues that not only should higher education lecturers working with work-based students adopt andragogic strategies but they should also promote heutagogic approaches that increase student autonomy. They should also communicate explicitly to their students the value of such strategies for learning in the field, both in theory and practice.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl
dc.subjectEarly Years Foundation Degreepl
dc.subjectwork-based learningpl
dc.subjectandragogypl
dc.subjectheutagogypl
dc.subjectmore knowledgeable otherpl
dc.subjectcommunities of practicepl
dc.subjectknowledge creationpl
dc.titleEnhancing Learning for Early Years Foundation Degree Students: Empowerment through Heutagogy and Reflecting on the Notion of Knowledgeable Otherspl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Eleonora Teszenyi, Cristina Devecchi, Tanya Richardson, published by University of Białystokpl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/poljes-2019-0003-
dc.description.EmailEleonora Teszenyi: eleonora.teszenyi@open.ac.ukpl
dc.description.EmailCristina Devecchi: cristina.devecci@northamapton.ac.ukpl
dc.description.EmailTanya Richardson: mail: tanya.richardson@northampton.ac.ukpl
dc.description.AffiliationEleonora Teszenyi - School of Early Childhood, Education, Youth and Sport, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UKpl
dc.description.AffiliationCristina Devecchi - The University of Northampton, Northampton, UKpl
dc.description.AffiliationTanya Richardson - The University of Northampton, Northampton, UKpl
dc.description.referencesAkyol, Z., & Garrison, R.D. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.xpl
dc.description.referencesBarnett, R., & Coate, K. (2010). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBasit, T., Eardley, A., Borup, R., Shah, H., Slack, K., & Hughes, A. (2015). Higher education institutions and work-based learning in the UK: employer engagement within a tripartite relationship. Higher Education, 70(6), 1003–1015.pl
dc.description.referencesBlackmur, D. (2015). Arguing with Stephanie Allais. Are national qualifications frameworks instruments of neoliberalism and social constructivism? Quality in Higher Education, 21(2), 213–228.pl
dc.description.referencesBlaschke, L.M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, 13, 56–71.pl
dc.description.referencesBecker, H.S. (1970). Field work evidence. In H. Becker, Sociological work: Method and substance (pp. 39–62). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.pl
dc.description.referencesBritish Educational Research Association (BERA) (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Available on: https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018.pl
dc.description.referencesBlunkett, D. (2000). Modernising higher education. London: Maritime Greenwich University.pl
dc.description.referencesBronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCanning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71–82. DOI:10.1080/14623940903500069.pl
dc.description.referencesChacko, T. (2018). Emerging pedagogies for effective adult learning: From andragogy to heutagogy. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences, 6(2), 278–284.pl
dc.description.referencesCoghlan, D., & Holian, R. (2007). Editorial: insider action research. Action Research, 5, 5–10.pl
dc.description.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.) Abingdon: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesCreswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.pl
dc.description.referencesCreswell, J.W., & Plano-Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed-method research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl
dc.description.referencesDepartment for Education and Skills (2004). Foundation degree task force report to ministers. London: DfES.pl
dc.description.referencesDrake, P. (2010). Grasping at methodological understanding: a cautionary tale from insider research. International Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 33(1), 85–99.pl
dc.description.referencesFleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development. Cultural historical concepts in play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesFoucault, M. (1970). The order of things: Archaeology of the human sciences. London: Pantheon Books.pl
dc.description.referencesGarrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Farmer.pl
dc.description.referencesGarrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.pl
dc.description.referencesGosling, A. (2016). Quality early years environments. In Slaughter, E. (Ed.), Quality in the early years. London: Open University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesGray, D. (2018). Doing research in the real world (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesHalsall, J.P., Powell, J.M., & Snowden, M. (2016). Determined learning approach: Implications of heutagogy society based learning. Cogent Social Sciences, 2, (online). Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1223904pl
dc.description.referencesHase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Ultibase retrieved from: https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20010220130000/http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htmpl
dc.description.referencesHase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: a child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111–119.pl
dc.description.referencesHigher Education Institution (2019). Early Years Foundation Degree Programme Handbook. Institution documentation.pl
dc.description.referencesKnowles, M.S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. Chicago: Association Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKnowles, M.S. (1984). Andragogy in action. Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey Bass.pl
dc.description.referencesLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesMaxwell, J.A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475–482.pl
dc.description.referencesMcAuliffe, M., Hargreaves, D., Winter, A., & Chadwick, G. (2008). Does pedagogy still rule? In Proceedings of the 2008 AAEE Conference, December 7–10, 2008, Yeppoon, Queensland. Retrieved from: http://www.engineersmedia.com.au/journals/aaee/pdf/AJEE_15_1McAuliffe%20F2.pdfpl
dc.description.referencesMcNiff, J. (2010). Action research for professional development. Poole: September Books.pl
dc.description.referencesMilligan, L. (2016). Insider-outsider-inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 235–250, DOI:10.1080/03057925.2014.928510.pl
dc.description.referencesNicholls, G. (2005). New lecturers’ constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 611–625.pl
dc.description.referencesNewson, J., & Newson, E. (1975). Intersubjectivity and the transmission of culture: on the social origins of symbolic functioning. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 437–446.pl
dc.description.referencesNonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesNonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 1(33), 5–34.pl
dc.description.referencesOi-Ngor Cheung, S. (2015). Pedagogical practice wisdom in social work practice teaching – a kaleidoscopic view. Social Work Education, 34(3), 258–274, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2014.1000293.pl
dc.description.referencesOppenheim, A.N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. New York: Continuum.pl
dc.description.referencesPyrko, I., Dorfler, V., & Eden, C. (2019). Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. Management Learning, 50(4), 482–499. DOI: 10.1177/1350507619860854pl
dc.description.referencesQuality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2015). The UK quality code for higher education. Available from: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/assuring-standards-and-quality/the-quality-codepl
dc.description.referencesRobinson, O.C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), pp. 25–41. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2013.801543pl
dc.description.referencesRobson, C., & McCartyan, K. (2016). Real world research (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.pl
dc.description.referencesSimon, A., Owen. C. Hollingworth, K., & Rutter, J. (2015). Provision and use of pre-school childcare in Britain. London: IOE Thomas Coram Research Unit.pl
dc.description.referencesTeusner, A. (2016) Insider research, validity issues, and the OHS professional: one person’s journey. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(1), 85–96. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1019263.pl
dc.description.referencesUNESCO (2011). International standard classification of education. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf.pl
dc.description.referencesUsher, R. (2002). Textuality and reflexivity in educational research. In D. Scott & R. Usher, (Eds.), Understanding Educational Research, (pp. 33–51), (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesVan Dijk, T.A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.pl
dc.description.referencesWang, V., & King. K. (2006). Understanding Mezirow’s theory of reflectivity from Confucian perspectives: a model and perspective. Radical Pedagogy, 8(1), 1–8.pl
dc.description.referencesWenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesWenger-Trayner, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Hutchison, S., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (Eds.). (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesYin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.pl
dc.description.referencesVygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2657-3628-
dc.description.volume2 (72)pl
dc.description.firstpage24pl
dc.description.lastpage44pl
dc.identifier.citation2Polish Journal of Educational Studiespl
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7465-4988-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5936-7040-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3050-3720-
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Polish Journal of Educational Studies 2019, Vol. 2 (72)

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons