REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19937
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorKaufman, James C.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-26T11:30:11Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-26T11:30:11Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 5, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 188-196pl
dc.identifier.issn2354-0036-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19937-
dc.description.abstractThere were four broad takeaways from the commentaries by the distinguished contributors. First, there was a caution on focusing too much on the positive outcomes. Second, there were several important considerations noted that can enrich the discussion. Third, people made a strong case for revisiting old outcomes with new methods and theories. Finally, there were suggestions for “new” positive outcomes that creativity may predict. I build on these and my own thoughts to offer an outline to cover a (hopefully expandable) list of potential outcomes. I end with a call for open commentaries to be considered for a future special section in this journal.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
dc.subjectCreativitypl
dc.subjectConscientiousnesspl
dc.subjectGradespl
dc.subjectWork performancepl
dc.subjectImproving creativitypl
dc.titleUniquely Creative: Developing a New Outline for Positive Outcomespl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2019 James C. Kaufman, published by University of Białystok.pl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2018-0018-
dc.description.Emailjames.kaufman@uconn.edupl
dc.description.AffiliationNeag School of Education, University of Connecticut, USApl
dc.description.referencesBacon, S. F. (2005). Positive psychology's two cultures. Review of General Psychology, 9, 181-192.pl
dc.description.referencesBarbot, B. (2018). “Generic” creativity as a predictor or outcome of identity development? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 159-164.pl
dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 266-276.pl
dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M (2018). Educational consequences of creativity: A creative learning perspective. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 146-154.pl
dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Presspl
dc.description.referencesCropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105-115.pl
dc.description.referencesDe Petrillo, L., & Winner, E. (2005). Does art improve mood? A test of a key assumption underlying art therapy. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 22, 205-212.pl
dc.description.referencesDuckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. New York: Scribner.pl
dc.description.referencesForgeard, M. (2018). Creativity for mental health: Seeking new answers to an old que-stion. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 165-169.pl
dc.description.referencesForgeard, M. J. C. (2013). Perceiving benefits after adversity: The relationship between self-reported posttraumatic growth and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 245–264.pl
dc.description.referencesForgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 250-269.pl
dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2018). Creativity in and for society. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 155-158.pl
dc.description.referencesGroyecka, A. (2018). Will becoming more creative make us more tolerant? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 170-176.pl
dc.description.referencesIvcevic, Z., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The can and cannot do attitude: How self estimates of ability vary across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 144-148.pl
dc.description.referencesJauk, E., & Sordia, N. (2018). On risks and side effects: Does creative accomplishment make us narcissistic? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 182-187.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 37-50.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2005). Non-biased assessment: A supplemental approach. In C. L. Frisby & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Children’s handbook of multicultural school psychology (pp. 824-840). New York: Wiley.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065-1082.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14, 189-203.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (Ed.) (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2018a). Creativity’s need for relevance in research and real life: Let’s set a new agenda for positive outcomes. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 124-137.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2018b). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 734-749.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2018c). What creativity can be, and what creativity can do. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nature of human creativity (pp. 125-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks, Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 56-69.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155-165.pl
dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V., & Baer, J. (Eds.) (2017). Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesLuria, S. R., O’Brien, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity in gifted identification: Increasing accuracy and diversity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 44-52.pl
dc.description.referencesMartela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-15.pl
dc.description.referencesPennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162–166.pl
dc.description.referencesReiter-Palmon, R. (2018). Are the outcomes of creativity always positive? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 177-181.pl
dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2018). Creative genius as inherently relevant and beneficial: The view from Mount Olympus. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 138-141.pl
dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2009). Genius 101. New York: Springer.pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. J. (2018). Yes, creativity can predict academic success. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 142-145.pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. J., Bonney, C. R., Gabora, L., & Merrifield, M. (2012). WICS: A model for college and university admissions. Educational Psychologist, 47, 30-41.pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75-101.pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Roberts, A. M. (in press). The relation of creativity to intelligence and wisdom. In J.C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2ⁿᵈ Ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesWaterman, A. S. (2013). The humanistic psychology–positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations. American Psychologist, 68, 124-133.pl
dc.description.volume5pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage188pl
dc.description.lastpage196pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2018, Vol. 5, Issue 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Creativity_5_2_2018_JC_Kaufman_Uniquely_Creative.pdf240,57 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons