REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19929
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorReiter-Palmon, Roni-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-26T08:59:13Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-26T08:59:13Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 5, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 177-181pl
dc.identifier.issn2354-0036-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19929-
dc.description.abstractThe paper by Kaufman (2018) calls for more research on the consequences of creativity. While we typically think about the positive consequences of creativity, it is important to understand that creativity can have negative, both intended and unintended consequences. In this commentary, I review the nascent literature on negative and malevolent creativity, and specifically discuss concerns regarding measurement. Having a consistent way to evaluate and measure negative creativity is critical to our understanding and future research.pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
dc.subjectCreativitypl
dc.subjectNegative Creativitypl
dc.subjectMalevolent Creativitypl
dc.titleAre the Outcomes of Creativity Always Positive?pl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Roni Reiter-Palmon, published by University of Białystok.pl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2018-0016-
dc.description.Emailrreiter-palmon@unomaha.edupl
dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, USApl
dc.description.referencesBeaussart, M. L., Andrews, C. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creative liars: The relation-ship between creativity and integrity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 129-134.pl
dc.description.referencesCropley, A. & Cropley, D. (2011). Creativity and lawbreaking. Creativity Research Jour-nal, 23, 313-320.pl
dc.description.referencesClark, K., & James, K. (1999). Justice and positive and negative creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 311-320.pl
dc.description.referencesCropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105-115.pl
dc.description.referencesCropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A. E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson percep-tions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 400-412.pl
dc.description.referencesGino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445-459.pl
dc.description.referencesGutworth, M. B., Cushenbery, L., & Hunter, S. T. (2016). Creativity for deliberate harm: Malevolent creativity and social information processing theory. Journal of Creative Behavior. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.155pl
dc.description.referencesHao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity: The malevolent creativity behavior scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 682.pl
dc.description.referencesHarris, D. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit ag-gression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 54-64.pl
dc.description.referencesHarris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelli-gence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 237-244.pl
dc.description.referencesHornberg & Reiter-Palmon (2017)pl
dc.description.referencesKapoor, H. (2015). The creative side of the dark triad. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 58-67.pl
dc.description.referencesKapoor, H., & Khan, A. (2016). The measurement of negative creativity: metrics and relationships. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 404-416.pl
dc.description.referencesKapoor, H., & Khan, A. (in press) Creativity in context: Presses and task effects in negative creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/aca0000183pl
dc.description.referencesLee, S. A., & Dow, G. T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking?. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 73-82.pl
dc.description.referencesLigon, G. S., Sporer, K., & Derrick, D. C. (2017). Violent innovation: Creativity in the do-main of terrorism. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains, 507-522. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesReiter-Palmon, R., Illies Young, M., Kobe, L., Buboltz, C., & Nimps, T. (2009). Creativity and domain specificity: The effect of task type of multiple indices on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 73-80.pl
dc.description.volume5pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage177pl
dc.description.lastpage181pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2018, Vol. 5, Issue 2

Pliki w tej pozycji:
Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
Creativity_5_2_2018_R_Reiter_Palmon_Are_the_Outcomes_of_Creativity_Always_Positive.pdf204,27 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons