W BIAŁYMSTOKU
Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19926Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Groyecka, Agata | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-26T08:14:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-26T08:14:21Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 5, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 170-176 | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2354-0036 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19926 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This commentary attempts to address the question of “Why creativity matters?” from the perspective of social psychology, by pointing out processes, which promote creativity while diminishing prejudices. I argue that through enhancing creativity, stereotyping can be reduced which can translate to the further improvement of intergroup relations. The common correlates of low prejudices and creativity supporting this hypothesis, are presented in this paper and comprise: (1) cognitive flexibility, (2) openness to experience and (3) perspective taking. Further, I invoke the existing literature regarding the link between schema-inconsistencies and creativity, which highlights the interrelatedness of these processes, but views creativity as an outcome, rather than a tool for social change. The assumed relationship can be seen as an opening to numerous future research paths, as it can give rise to various detailed questions from the points of view of basic and applied psychology. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | University of Białystok | pl |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | Creativity | pl |
| dc.subject | Openness | pl |
| dc.subject | Flexibility | pl |
| dc.subject | Stereotypes | pl |
| dc.subject | Prejudice | pl |
| dc.subject | Interventions | pl |
| dc.title | Will Becoming More Creative Make us More Tolerant? | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2019 Agata Groyecka, published by University of Białystok. | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/ctra-2018-0015 | - |
| dc.description.Email | agata.groyecka@gmail.com | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | University of Wroclaw, Poland | pl |
| dc.description.references | Baas, M., Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Personality and creativity: The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 732-748. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309-319. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Beelmann, A., & Heinemann, K. S. (2014). Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A metaanalysis of child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 10-24. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Brandt, M. J., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2015). Bounded openness: The effect of Openness to Experience on intolerance is moderated by target group conventionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 549-568. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Carson, S. H., Higgins, D. M., & Peterson, J. B. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499-506. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Cohrs, J. C., Kämpfe-Hargrave, N., & Riemann, R. (2012). Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: Evidence from peer-report data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 343. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Cramer, R. J., Miller, A. K., Amacker, A. M., & Burks, A. C. (2013). Openness, right-wing authoritarianism, and antigay prejudice in college students: A mediational model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 64-71. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Dahl, M., & Krog, N. (2018). Experimental evidence of discrimination in the labour market: Intersections between ethnicity, gender, and socio-economic status. European Sociological Review, 34, 1-16. | pl |
| dc.description.references | De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). The emotive roots of creativity: Basic and applied issues on affect and motivation. In M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 217-240), San Diego, CA: Elsevier. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Dziedziewicz, D., Gajda, A., & Karwowski, M. (2014). Developing children’s intercultural competence and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 32-42. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (2001). Decategorization and the reduction of bias in the crossed categorization paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 193-216. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Gocłowska, M. A., Baas, M., Crisp, R. J., & Dreu, C. K. W. De. (2014). Schema incon-sistency and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 959-971. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Gocłowska, M. A., & Crisp, R. J. (2013). On counter-stereotypes and creative cognition: When interventions for reducing prejudice can boost divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 72-79. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Gocłowska, M. A., Crisp, R. J., & Labuschagne, K. (2013). Can counter-stereotypes boost flexible thinking? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16, 217-231. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hall, N. R., & Crisp, R. J. (2005). Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1435-1444. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hawlina, H., Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2017). Difficult differences: A socio-cultural analysis of how diversity can enable and inhibit creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 0, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.182 | pl |
| dc.description.references | Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., Legault, L., & Kang, S. K. (2011). Lingering effects: Stereotype threat hurts more than you think. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 227-256. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Jackson, J. W., & Poulsen, J. R. (2005). Contact experiences mediate the relationship between five‐factor model personality traits and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 667-685. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Creativity’s need for relevance in research and real life: Let’s set a new agenda for positive outcomes. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 124-137. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Leung, A. K. yee, & Chiu, C. Y. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 723-741. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Luria, S. R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Examining the relationship between creativity and equitable thinking in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 1279-1284. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Luria, S. R., Sriraman, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49, 1033-1039. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1047-1061. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Mednick, S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213-214. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34-77. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339-367. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Paradies, Y. (2006). A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 888-901. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15-25. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sassenberg, K., Moskowitz, G. B., Fetterman, A., & Kessler, T. (2017). Priming creativity as a strategy to increase creative performance by facilitating the activation and use of remote associations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 128-138. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087-1090. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Stefaniak, A. & Bilewicz, M. (2014). Zmiana postaw w wyniku wymian studenckich: Rola kontaktu międzygrupowego i redukcji zagrożenia [Changes in attitudes as a result of participation in a student exchange program: The role of intergroup contact and threat reduction]. Psychologia Społeczna, 3, 311-322. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729-743. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Stephan, W. G., & Vogt, W. P. (2004). Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455-472. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Winnicott, D. W. (2012). Playing and reality. London: Routledge. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 61-73. | pl |
| dc.description.volume | 5 | pl |
| dc.description.issue | 2 | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 170 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 176 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications | pl |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2018, Vol. 5, Issue 2 | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creativity_5_2_2018_A_Groyecka_Will_Becoming_More_Creative_Make_us_More_Tolerant.pdf | 251,01 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
