REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2018, Vol. 5, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19918
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorSimonton, Dean Keith-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-03-24T12:11:57Z-
    dc.date.available2026-03-24T12:11:57Z-
    dc.date.issued2018-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 5, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 138-141pl
    dc.identifier.issn2354-0036-
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19918-
    dc.description.abstractThe author responds to Kaufman’s (2018) target essay from a unique perspective – research on creative genius. Although the author began studying little-c creativity, he switched to Big-C creativity when he did his doctoral dissertation, and continued that work for the rest of his career. One implication of such research is that the relevance of creative genius cannot be questioned, even if its benefits are some-times ambiguous (however obviously consequential). Another implication is that creative geniuses do not require training in creativity, whatever usefulness such instruction may possess for everyday creativity.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectGeniuspl
    dc.subjectBig-C versus little-c creativitypl
    dc.subjectCosts versus benefitspl
    dc.subjectCreativity trainingpl
    dc.titleCreative Genius as Inherently Relevant and Beneficial: The View from Mount Olympuspl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2019 Dean Keith Simonton, published by University of Białystok.pl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2018-0009-
    dc.description.Emaildksimonton@ucdavis.edupl
    dc.description.AffiliationUniversity of California, Davis, USApl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. (2018). Creativity’s need for relevance in research and real life: Let’s set a new agenda for positive outcomes. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 124-137.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-13.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (1974). The social psychology of creativity: An archival data analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (1975a). Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 259-277.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (1975b). Creativity, task complexity, and intuitive versus analytical problem solving. Psychological Reports, 37, 351-354.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (1975c). Interdisciplinary creativity over historical time: A correlational analysis of generational fluctuations. Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 181-188.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (1975d). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119-1133.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (1980). Intuition and analysis: A predictive and explanatory model. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 102, 3-60pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (1984). Generational time-series analysis: A paradigm for studying sociocultural influences. In K. Gergen & M. Gergen (Eds.), Historical social psychology (pp. 141-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2002). It’s absolutely impossible? A longitudinal study of one psychologist’s response to conventional naysayers. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Psychologists defying the crowd: Stories of those who battled the establishment and won (pp. 238- 254). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2013). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. In J. Chan & K. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 69-83). Cheltenham Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.pl
    dc.description.volume5pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage138pl
    dc.description.lastpage141pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2018, Vol. 5, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_5_2_2018_DK_Simonton_Creative_Genius_as_Inherently_Relevant_and_Beneficial.pdf204,25 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons