REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19884
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorKwaśnik, Marta-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T13:09:23Z-
    dc.date.available2026-03-19T13:09:23Z-
    dc.date.issued2016-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 363-378pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19884-
    dc.description.abstractThis study provides preliminary data on the dynamic role of participants’ agency-communion orientation in their perception of fictional students’ agency, communion and creativity, depending on descriptions of stereotypical and unstereotypical traits and behaviours. I propose that a stereotypically masculine description (i.e. more agentic) will boost the male’s - but not the female’s - perceived creativity. Polish students majoring in computer science (N = 108) read short stories about male and female interns at an IT company. Participants assessed the interns’ agency, communion and creativity. The results demonstrated that the image of the agentic man as well as the participants’ agentic-orientation are significant predictors of a male’s perceived creativity. The findings are discussed in terms of the gender-based nature of the agency-communion concept.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by a grant funded to Marta Kwasnik by The Maria Grzegorzewska University, BSTM 1/16-I.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International Deed-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectAgency-Communion Orientationpl
    dc.subjectPerception of Creativitypl
    dc.subjectGender Stereotypespl
    dc.subjectComputer Sciencepl
    dc.titleFrom Big Bang to Big Gap? Potential Links Between Agency-Communion Orientation and Perception of Creativity in Computer Sciencepl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2016 Marta Kwaśnik, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2016-0022-
    dc.description.Emailmkwasnik@talent.edu.plpl
    dc.description.AffiliationThe Maria Grzegorzewska University, Polandpl
    dc.description.referencesAbele, A. E. (2003). The Dynamics of Masculine-Agentic and Feminine-Communal Traits: Findings from a Prospective Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768-776.pl
    dc.description.referencesAbele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.pl
    dc.description.referencesAbele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic contents in social cognition: A Dual Perspective Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195-255.pl
    dc.description.referencesBaer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75-105.pl
    dc.description.referencesBakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.pl
    dc.description.referencesBi, C., Ybarra, O., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Accentuating your masculine side. Agentic traits generally dominate self-evaluation, even in China. Social Psychology, 44, 104-109.pl
    dc.description.referencesBianco, M., Harris, B., Garrison-Wade, D., & Leech, N. (2011). Gifted girls: Gender bias in gifted referrals. Roeper Review, 33, 170-181.pl
    dc.description.referencesBush, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.pl
    dc.description.referencesCarli, L. L., Alawa, L. , Lee, Y. , Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes About Gender and Science: Women ≠ Scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40,1-17.pl
    dc.description.referencesCassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (Cuse) Scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 133-153.pl
    dc.description.referencesCheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045-1060.pl
    dc.description.referencesCheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69, 58-71.pl
    dc.description.referencesCheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzof, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,1-8.pl
    dc.description.referencesChua, S. L., Chen, D., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A metaanalysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 609-623.pl
    dc.description.referencesDiekman, A. B, & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the Changes: A Role Congruity Perspective on Gender Norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 369-383.pl
    dc.description.referencesDiekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M. & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles: A New Look at Why Women Opt Out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers. Psychological Science, 2,1051-1057.pl
    dc.description.referencesDiekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Of men, women, and motivation: A role congruity account. In J.Y. Shah & W.L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 434-447). New York: Guilford.pl
    dc.description.referencesEagly, A., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from distributions of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.pl
    dc.description.referencesEagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19-35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.pl
    dc.description.referencesFiske, S.T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). First judge warmth, then competence: Fundamental social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.pl
    dc.description.referencesFlorida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class, New York: Basic Books.pl
    dc.description.referencesGilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21-28.pl
    dc.description.referencesGralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students' gender moderates accuracy of teachers’ ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290-304.pl
    dc.description.referencesGralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Are Teachers' Implicit Theories of Creativity Related to the Recognition of Their Students' Creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 0, 1-17.pl
    dc.description.referencesHeilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 269-298). Greenwich, CT: JAI.pl
    dc.description.referencesHelgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin,116, 412-428.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising g college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 913-917.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62-70.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Jankowska, D.M., Gralewski, J., Wiśniewska, E., & Lebuda, I. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity: A latent variables approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 159-166.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-beliefs is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 1-8.pl
    dc.description.referencesKwaśnik, M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Please, Mind the Gap. Gender and Computer Science Education. Journal of Gender and Power, 67-90.pl
    dc.description.referencesMargolis J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: women in computing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesMarkus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.pl
    dc.description.referencesMoskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761pl
    dc.description.referencesProudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A Gender Bias in the Attribution of Creativity: Archival and Experimental Evidence for the Perceived Association Between Masculinity and Creative Thinking. Psychological Science, 1-11.pl
    dc.description.referencesRosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 235-297.pl
    dc.description.referencesSaleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A. M. (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1922-1936.pl
    dc.description.referencesSaunders, D., & Thagard, P. (2005). Creativity in Computer Science. In J.C. Kaufman & J.Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domain: Faces of the muse (pp.153-167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbraum.pl
    dc.description.referencesTang, CH., Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Implicit theories of creativity in computer science in the United States and China. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49,137-156.pl
    dc.description.referencesTang, M., Werner, C., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Differences in creative mindset between Germany and Poland: The mediating effect of individualism and collectivism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 31-40.pl
    dc.description.referencesTwenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in Masculine and Feminine Traits over Time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.pl
    dc.description.referencesTwenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women’s assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.pl
    dc.description.referencesWhitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.pl
    dc.description.referencesWojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.pl
    dc.description.referencesWojciszke, B., & Szlendak, M. (2010). Skale do pomiaru orientacji sprawczej i wspólnotowej [Scales for measuring the agentic and communal orientation]. Psychologia Spoleczna, 5, 57-69.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume3pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage363pl
    dc.description.lastpage378pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_3_2_2016_M_Kwasnik_From_Big_Bang_to_Big_Gap.pdf1,08 MBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons