REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19876
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorGralewski, Jacek-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T11:07:32Z-
    dc.date.available2026-03-19T11:07:32Z-
    dc.date.issued2016-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 292-329pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19876-
    dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to research teachers’ beliefs about creativity and possibilities for its development in Polish high schools. The study consisted of in-depth interviews. It was conducted with a group of 15 high school teachers, all of whom taught the key subjects (math, Polish and foreign languages) for the final school-leaving examination. The qualitative thematic analysis applied to the collected data revealed eight themes. Each of them concerned the teachers’ understanding of what creativity really is, their attitude towards students’ creative activity at school, aims that they formulated to stimulate their creativity, as well as the role and place of students’ creative activity at school. In addition, the themes referred to actions that had been taken by the teachers to stimulate their students’ creativity and factors that inhibited or stimulated the development of students’ creativity at school. The teachers, who were the subject of the analysis, understood creativity as creative potential, that is, the ability to think independently, to give new and original solutions to all sorts of tasks and problems, as well as creative activity oriented towards everyday innovation. Additionally, the study revealed that there exists a creativity gap between verbal support for developing students’ creativity at school and classroom practice.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThe research was financed as part of the “Iuventus Plus” Programme of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education for 2015-2016, Project No. IP2014 013373, implemented by Jacek Gralewski.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International Deed-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectCreativitypl
    dc.subjectCreative potentialpl
    dc.subjectEducationpl
    dc.subjectTeachers’ beliefspl
    dc.subjectTeachers’ conceptionspl
    dc.subjectImplicit theoriespl
    dc.titleTeachers’ Beliefs About Creativity and Possibilities for its Development in Polish High Schools: A Qualitative Studypl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2016 Jacek Gralewski, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2016-0019-
    dc.description.Emailjacekgralewski@o2.plpl
    dc.description.AffiliationThe Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Polandpl
    dc.description.referencesAljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17-34.pl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Co: Westvie Pres, Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesAndiliou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5, 201-219.pl
    dc.description.referencesBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.pl
    dc.description.referencesBarbot, B., Besançon, M., Lubart, T. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education 3-13, 43, 371-381.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R. A. (2007). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29, 265-270.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can’t get there from here” (pp. 316-332). In J. Kaufman, & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesBraun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.pl
    dc.description.referencesBurgess, L., & Addison, N. (2007). Conditions for learning: Partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 26, 185-198.pl
    dc.description.referencesBurnard, P. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 667-682.pl
    dc.description.referencesBurnard, P., Craft, A., & Cremin, T. (2006). Documenting ‘possibility thinking’: A journey of collaborative enquiry. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14, 243-262.pl
    dc.description.referencesChan, D. W. & Chan, L. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers` perception of students characteristics in Hong-Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185-195.pl
    dc.description.referencesCheung, W. M., Tse, S. K., & Tsang, H. W. (2003). Teaching creative writing skills to primary school children in Hong Kong: Discordance between the views and practices of language teachers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(2), 77-97.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.pl
    dc.description.referencesCraft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 113-127.pl
    dc.description.referencesCremin, T., P. Burnard, & A. Craft. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 108-119.pl
    dc.description.referencesCropley, A.J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity in the classroom. Norwood: Ablex.pl
    dc.description.referencesCropley, A. J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runco, S. R. Pritzker (Eds.). Encyclopedia of creativity. Volume 1 (pp. 511-524). San Diego: Academic Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCropley, A. J. (2010). Creativity in the classroom: The dark side. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (Eds.). The dark side of creativity (pp. 297-315). Cambridge: University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCumming, R. (2007). Language play in the classroom: Encouraging children’s intuitive creativity with words through poetry. Literacy, 41(2), 93-101.pl
    dc.description.referencesDawson, V. L., Andrea, T., Affinito, R., & Westby, E. L. (1999). Predicting creative behavior: A reexamination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 57-66.pl
    dc.description.referencesDavies, D., D. Jindal-Snape, C. Collier, R. Digby, P. Hay, & A. Howe. (2013). Creative learning environments in education - A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80-91.pl
    dc.description.referencesDiakidoy, I. N., & Kanari, E. (1999). Student teachers’ beliefs about creativity. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 225-244.pl
    dc.description.referencesEckhoff, A. (2011). Creativity in the early childhood classroom: Perspectives of preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32, 240-255.pl
    dc.description.referencesFasko, D. (2000-2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317-327.pl
    dc.description.referencesFleith, D. de Suoza (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148-153.pl
    dc.description.referencesFryer, M., & Collings, J. A. (1991). British teachers’ views of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(1), 75-81.pl
    dc.description.referencesGajda, A., Karwowski, M., Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79-93.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2011). Children and creativity: A most (un)likely pair? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 122-131.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories ‒ Research ‒ Applications, 1(1), 10-32.pl
    dc.description.referencesGralewski, J., Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students' gender moderates accuracy of teachers' ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290-304.pl
    dc.description.referencesGralewski, J., Karwowski, M. (in press). Are teachers’ implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students’ creativity? The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 0, Iss. 0, pp. 1-17, Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1002/jocb.140pl
    dc.description.referencesGuilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.pl
    dc.description.referencesJankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1591, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591.pl
    dc.description.referencesKampylis, P., Berki, E., & Saariluoma, P. (2009). In-service and prospective teachers’ conceptions of creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 15-29.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 547-558.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M. (2015). Development of the Creative Self-Concept. Creativity. Theories ‒ Research ‒ Applications, 2(2), 166-180.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Gralewski, J., Lebuda, I., & Wiśniewska, E. (2007). Creative teaching of creativity teachers: Polish perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 57-61.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development and correlates (pp. 302-326). In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development (2nd Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M. & Lebuda, I. (2015). Big Five, Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214-232.pl
    dc.description.referencesKarwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E, & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five personality factors as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 215-232.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J.C. & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.pl
    dc.description.referencesKharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity.4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338-352.pl
    dc.description.referencesLee, E. A., & Seo, H. A. (2006). Understanding of creativity by Korean elementary teachers in gifted education. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 237-242.pl
    dc.description.referencesLevenson, E. (2015). Exploring Ava’s developing sense for tasks that may occasion mathematical creativity. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 18, 1-25.pl
    dc.description.referencesLiu, S., & Lin, H. (2014). Primary teachers beliefs about scientific creativity in the classroom context. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1551-1567.pl
    dc.description.referencesMakel, M. C. (2009). Help us creativity researchers, you’re our only hope. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 38-42.pl
    dc.description.referencesMaksić, S., Pavlović, J. (2011). Educational researchers’ personal explicit theories on creativity and its development: A qualitative study. High Ability Studies, 22(2), 219-231.pl
    dc.description.referencesMontgomery, D., Bull, K. S., & Baloche, L. (1993). Characteristics of the creative person. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 68-78.pl
    dc.description.referencesNewton, L., & Beverton, S. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of creativity in elementary school English. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 165-176.pl
    dc.description.referencesNęcka, E. (1999). Proces twórczy i jego ograniczenia [The creative process and its limitations]. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.pl
    dc.description.referencesPark, S., Lee, S., Oliver, J. S., & Cramond, B. (2006). Changes in Korean science teachers’ perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 37-64.pl
    dc.description.referencesPearlman, C. (1983). Teachers as an informational resource in identifying and rating student creativity. Education, 103, 215-222.pl
    dc.description.referencesPerkins, D. N. (1981). The Minds Best Work. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesPlucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.pl
    dc.description.referencesPlucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.pl
    dc.description.referencesRichards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In R. Richards (Eds.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature (pp. 25-54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.pl
    dc.description.referencesRubenstein, L. D., McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for creativity scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 324-334.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 317-324.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A. (2009). Creativity, definition. In: B. Kerr (Eds.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity and talent. Volume 1 (pp. 200-202). Los Angeles: Sage Reference Publication.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96.pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents` and teachers` implicit theories of chidren`s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23(2), 91-113.pl
    dc.description.referencesSak, U. (2004). About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review, 26, 216-222.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.pl
    dc.description.referencesSkiba, T., Tan, M., Sternberg, R. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Roads not taken, new roads to take. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.). Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 252-269). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSommer, U., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. (2008). Detection of high ability children by teachers and parents: Psychometric quality of new rating checklists for the assessment of intellectual, creative and social ability. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 189-205.pl
    dc.description.referencesUrhahne, D. (2011). Teachers` judgments of elementary students` ability, creativity and task commitment. Talent Development & Excellence, 3, 229-237.pl
    dc.description.referencesWestby, E. L. & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1-10.pl
    dc.description.referencesWood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 84-96.pl
    dc.description.referencesEuropean Parliament and Council Decision, 1350, § 1-9 (2008).pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume3pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage292pl
    dc.description.lastpage329pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_3_2_2016_J_Gralewski_Teachers’_Beliefs_About_Creativity.pdf949,08 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons