REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19874
Pełny rekord metadanych
Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
dc.contributor.authorFormiga Sobrinho, Asdrúbal Borges-
dc.contributor.authorGlăveanu, Vlad Petre-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T10:53:16Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-19T10:53:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 4, Issue 2, 2017, pp. 178-197pl
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19874-
dc.description.abstractHow can hierarchy influence individual creativity in the work environment? In the contemporary literature about creativity in organizations sometimes factors like this are considered constraints. However, the question remains as to how the meaning of hierarchy can change or what causes changes in a given organizational culture. This paper aims to document these processes in a Brazilian public organization, by considering the creative actions of employees, in particular those meant to enhance communicability or the potential for making communication effective. To reach this goal, thematic content analysis was applied to individual interviews of two employees. Considering the contradictions and ambiguities in their discourses and actions, the results point to the fact that environmental factors like hierarchy can change their meaning according to employees’ actions and interactions with colleagues and managers. This makes the communication stimulating or constraining for creativity, at least as expressed in the generation of new meanings or novelties. Thus, the practical question to reflect upon be comes: how can individual actions change the meaning of hierarchy and make the work environment more favorable to creativity?pl
dc.language.isoenpl
dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Licensepl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pl
dc.subjectInterpersonal communicationpl
dc.subjectCommunicabilitypl
dc.subjectCreativitypl
dc.subjectHierarchypl
dc.subjectOrganizational culturepl
dc.titleCreativity, Communicability and Organizational Culture: an Introduction to the Study of Hierarchy as Both a Facilitator and Constraint in Organizational Changepl
dc.typeArticlepl
dc.rights.holder© 2017 Asdrúbal Borges Formiga Sobrinho, Vlad Petre Glăveanu, published by University of Białystok.pl
dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2017-0010-
dc.description.EmailAsdrúbal Borges Formiga Sobrinho: asdru_bal@uol.com.brpl
dc.description.EmailVlad Petre Glăveanu: vlad@hum.aau.dkpl
dc.description.AffiliationAsdrúbal Borges Formiga Sobrinho - Universidade de Brasília, Brazilpl
dc.description.AffiliationVlad Petre Glăveanu - Aalborg University, Denmarkpl
dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: Perseus Books.pl
dc.description.referencesBakhtin, M. M. (1997). Estética da criação verbal (2a ed). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.pl
dc.description.referencesBakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBarron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.pl
dc.description.referencesBauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2002). Qualidade, quantidade e interesses do conhecimento – Evitando confusões. In M. Bauer, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: Um manual prático (pp. 17-36). Petrópolis: Vozes.pl
dc.description.referencesBruno-Faria, M. de F. (2003). Criatividade, inovação e mudança organizacional. In S. M. V. Lima (Ed.), Mudança organizacional: Teoria e gestão (pp. 111-141). Rio de Janeiro: FGV.pl
dc.description.referencesChoi, J. N., Anderson, T. A., & Veillette, A. (2009). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 34, 330-357.pl
dc.description.referencesCollins, M. A., & Amabile, T. (2006). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesCurvello, J. J. A. (2012). Comunicação interna e cultura organizacional. Brasília: Casa das Musas.pl
dc.description.referencesEisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.pl
dc.description.referencesEisenberg, E. M., Goodall JR., H. L., & Trethewey, A. (2010). Organizational communication: balancing creativity and constraint. (6th ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.pl
dc.description.referencesElmholdt, C., & Fogsgaard, M. Power. (2016). In V. P. Glăveanu, L. Tangaard, & C. Wegener (Org.). Creativity - A new vocabulary (pp. 111-120). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesGaskell, G. (2002). Entrevistas individuais e grupais. In M. Bauer, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: Um manual prático (pp. 64-89). Petrópolis: Vozes.pl
dc.description.referencesGillespie, A. (2010). The intersubjective nature of symbols. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformation – The mind in movement trough culture and society (pp. 23-37). New York: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (2014). Rethinking creativity: contributions from social and cultural psychology. Didcot, UK: Routledge.pl
dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New ideas in psychology, 28 (1), 79-93.pl
dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2012). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five a's framework. Review of General Psychology, 3, 1-13.pl
dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2016). Things. In V. P. Glăveanu, L. Tangaard, & C. Wegener (Eds.). Creativity – a new vocabulary (pp. 164-171). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P., Lubart, T. (2014). Decentring the Creative Self: How Others Make Creativity Possible in Creative Professional Fields. Creativity and Innovation Management, 46(1), 29-43.pl
dc.description.referencesJuelsbo, T. (2016). Rules. In V. P. Glăveanu, L. Tangaard, & C. Wegener (Eds.). Creativity - A new vocabulary (pp. 137-146). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesLotman, I. (1978). A estrutura do texto artístico. Lisboa: Editorial Estampa.pl
dc.description.referencesLahlou, S., & Beaudouin, V. (2016). Creativity and culture in organizations. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 475-498). London: Palgrave Macmillan.pl
dc.description.referencesLudwig, A. M. (1992). Culture and creativity. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46(3), 454-469.pl
dc.description.referencesLubart, T. (2007). Psicologia da criatividade. Porto Alegre: Artmed.pl
dc.description.referencesMachado, I. (2003). Escola de semiótica. São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial/Fapesp.pl
dc.description.referencesMarcondes Filho, C. (2010). O princípio da razão durante: O conceito de comunicação e a epistemologia metapórica. São Paulo: Paulus.pl
dc.description.referencesMarcondes Filho, C. (2016). Teorias da comunicação hoje. São Paulo: Paulus.pl
dc.description.referencesMartino, L. C. (2001). De qual comunicação estamos falando? In A. Hohlfeldt, L. C Martino, & V. V. França (Eds.), Teorias da Comunicação: Conceitos, escolas e tendências (pp. 11-25). Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.pl
dc.description.referencesNegus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. Londres: Sage.pl
dc.description.referencesPaulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., & Kohn, N. W. (2012). Collaborative creativity: Group creativity and team Innovation. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.). Handbook of organizational creativity. (pp. 327-357). Taramani, Chennai: Elsevier.pl
dc.description.referencesSternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Constraints on Creativity: Obvious and not so obvious. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 467-482). New York: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.description.referencesStokes, P. D. (2007). Using Constraints to Generate and Sustain Novelty. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 107-113.pl
dc.description.referencesThayer, L. O. (1973). Comunicação e teoria da organização. In F. E. X. Dance (Ed.), Human communication theory – Original essays (pp. 94-148). São Paulo: Cultrix.pl
dc.description.referencesTejerina, J. C., & Rosa, A. (2007). Psychology within time. Theorising about the making of sociocultural psychology. In J. Valsiner, & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 62-81). Cambridge: CUP.pl
dc.description.referencesValsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage Publications.pl
dc.description.referencesVigotski, L. S. (1998). Pensamento e linguagem. (2a ed.). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.pl
dc.description.referencesVigotski, L. S. (2000[1929]). Psicologia concreta do homem. Educação e Sociedade, 71, 23-44.pl
dc.description.referencesWallon, H. (1979). Psicologia e educação da criança. Lisboa: Editorial Vega.pl
dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
dc.description.volume4pl
dc.description.issue2pl
dc.description.firstpage178pl
dc.description.lastpage197pl
dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2017, Vol. 4, Issue 2

Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons