REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19870
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorTorre, Ilaria-
    dc.contributor.authorLoesche, Frank-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T10:10:50Z-
    dc.date.available2026-03-19T10:10:50Z-
    dc.date.issued2016-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 244-260pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19870-
    dc.description.abstractThe ability to communicate complex meanings is a specific human ability which plays a crucial role in social interactions. A habitual example of these interactions is conversation. However, we observe that spontaneous conversation often hits an impasse when none of the interlocutors immediately produces a follow-up utterance. The existence of impasses in conversations, and the way that interlocutors overcome them provide evidence for our argument that conversation is a sequence of creative problem solving. In this work we use techniques from Conversation Analysis (CA) on publicly available databases of naturally-occurring speech and we suggest a framework to understand how impasses are reached and overcome. As a result, we hope to reveal yet another instance of the bond between language and creativity.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by CogNovo (FP7-PEOPLE2013-ITN-604764), a project funded by the EU Marie Curie programme.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International Deed-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectImpassepl
    dc.subjectConversationpl
    dc.subjectCreative problem solvingpl
    dc.subjectConversation Analysispl
    dc.titleOvercoming Impasses in Conversations: A Creative Businesspl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2016 Ilaria Torre, Frank Loesche, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2016-0016-
    dc.description.EmailIlaria Torre: Ilaria.Torre@Plymouth.ac.ukpl
    dc.description.EmailFrank Loesche: Frank.Loesche@Plymouth.ac.ukpl
    dc.description.AffiliationIlaria Torre - Plymouth University, UKpl
    dc.description.AffiliationFrank Loesche - Plymouth University, UKpl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.pl
    dc.description.referencesAustin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesBeeftink, F., Van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2008). The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: do you need a break right now? Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 358-364.pl
    dc.description.referencesBoden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd edition). Routledge.pl
    dc.description.referencesBoersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: doing Phonetics by computer.pl
    dc.description.referencesBowden, E. M. & Jung-Beeman, M. (2006). Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods, 42, 87-99. doi:doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007pl
    dc.description.referencesCanavan, A., Graff, D., & Zipperlen, G. (1997). Callhome American English speech. Linguistic Data Consortium.pl
    dc.description.referencesChambliss, C. A. & Feeny, N. (1992). Effects of sex of subject, sex of interrupter, and topic of conversation on the perceptions of interruptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(3f), 1235-1241.pl
    dc.description.referencesClark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesCranford, E. A. & Moss, J. (2012). Is insight always the same? a protocol analysis of insight in compound remote associative problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4. doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1129pl
    dc.description.referencesCummins, F., Li, C., & Wang, B. (2013). Coupling among speakers during synchronous speaking in English and Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 432-441.pl
    dc.description.referencesde Jong, N. H. & Wempe, T. (2009, May). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385-390. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.385pl
    dc.description.referencesDemuth, C. & Glaveanu, V. P. (2016). Creativity - A New Vocabulary. In V. P. Glaveanu, L. Tanggaard, & C. Wegener (Eds.), (Chap. Language, pp. 52-60). Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137511805pl
    dc.description.referencesDonaldson, S. K. (1979). One kind of speech act: How do we know when we’re conversing? Semiotica, 28(3-4), 259-300.pl
    dc.description.referencesFischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63, 482-512. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs. 2005.04.014pl
    dc.description.referencesFleck, J. I. & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436-463. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.779248pl
    dc.description.referencesGilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611-625. doi:10.1348/096317907X173421pl
    dc.description.referencesGrice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 377-388.pl
    dc.description.referencesGrice, H. P. (1975). Syntax and semantics: Speech acts Volume 3. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), (Chap. Logic and conversation. pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesGuilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.pl
    dc.description.referencesHalliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.pl
    dc.description.referencesHocevar, D. (1979). Ideational Fluency as a Confounding Factor in the Measurement of Originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 191-196.pl
    dc.description.referencesHoward, T., Culley, S., & Dekoninck, E. (2007). Creativity in the Engineering Design Process. In International conference of engineering design.pl
    dc.description.referencesJacewicz, E., Fox, R. A., O’Neill, C., & Salmons, J. (2009, July). Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change, 21(02), 233-256. doi:10.1017/s0954394509990093pl
    dc.description.referencesJefferson, G. (2004). Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), (Chap. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction, pp. 13-31). John Benjamins Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesJordan, M. E., Lanham, H. J., Crabtree, B. F., Nutting, P. A., Miller, W. L., Stange, K. C., & McDaniel, R. R. (2009). The role of conversation in health care interventions: Enabling sensemaking and learning. Implement Sci, 4(15), 1-13.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaplan, M. A. (1997). Learning to converse in a foreign language: The reception game. Simulation & Gaming, 28(2), 149-163.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229-236. doi:10.1037/a0033295pl
    dc.description.referencesLerner, G. H. (2004). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins Publishing.pl
    dc.description.referencesMacWhinney, B. (2007). The Talkbank Project. In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora (pp. 163-180). Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesMcCarthy, M. (2001). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. In D. Nunan & R. Carter (Eds.), (Chap. Discourse, pp. 48-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesMoss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2011). The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, or after an impasse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(1), 140-148. doi:10.1037/a0021206pl
    dc.description.referencesNewell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesOhlsson, S. (2011). Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesÖllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the ninedot problem. Psychological Research, 78(2), 266-275.pl
    dc.description.referencesPark, I. (2010). Marking an impasse: The use of anyway as a sequence-closing device. Journal of Pragmatics, 42. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.002pl
    dc.description.referencesReed, S. K. (2015). The Structure of Ill-Structured (and Well-Structured) Problems Revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 1-26. doi:10.1007/s10648-0159343-1pl
    dc.description.referencesRunco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092pl
    dc.description.referencesSacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I and II (G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.pl
    dc.description.referencesSacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 696-735.pl
    dc.description.referencesSalvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Thinking & Reasoning. doi:10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798pl
    dc.description.referencesSchegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSearle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSelting, M. (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turnconstructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6, 371-388.pl
    dc.description.referencesSilvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., ... Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68-85. doi:doi:10.1037/1931-3896. 2.2.68pl
    dc.description.referencesSimon, H. A. (1973). The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.pl
    dc.description.referencesStein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and Culture. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 36(2), 311-322. doi:10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897pl
    dc.description.referencesStivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., ... Yoon, K.-E., et al. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587-10592.pl
    dc.description.referencesWallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children. A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence distinction. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.pl
    dc.description.referencesWallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. Jonathan Cape London.pl
    dc.description.referencesWarren, M. (2006). Features of Naturalness in Conversation. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. John Benjamins Publishing. doi:10.1075/pbns.152pl
    dc.description.referencesWeisberg, R. W. (2015). Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 5-39. doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.886625pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume3pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage244pl
    dc.description.lastpage260pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_3_2_2016_I_Torre_F_Loesche_Overcoming_Impasses_in_Conversations.pdf598,76 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons