REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19864
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorElisondo, Romina-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-03-19T08:13:33Z-
    dc.date.available2026-03-19T08:13:33Z-
    dc.date.issued2016-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 194-210pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19864-
    dc.description.abstractThe article explores the social essence of creativity. Two studies where interactions with others shape the development of creative processes are presented; first, theoretical perspectives on creativity as social process are discussed. The first study analyzes social aspects of creative processes developed during leisure activities. Men and women (N=150) living in Córdoba (Argentina) were interviewed in the re search. The second study is a form of biographical research. The sample includes 22 Argentine personalities prominent in the scientific and artistic fields. As a main result, in the two studies we observed that links with family, teachers, peers, colleagues, mentors, tutors and disciples shape the possibilities of developing everyday creativity as well as Big-C creativity. Finally, considerations and suggestions for future re search on creativity as a social process are presented. Creativity emerges from dialogues, interactions and practices with others. It is not a solitary process: it involves languages, knowledge and actions that are socially constructed.pl
    dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was conducted under the PIP (2014-2016) project subsidized by the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research of Argentina (CONICET) and the PICT 2615/2013 project subsidized by the Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion of Argentina.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International Deed-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectEveryday Creativitypl
    dc.subjectBig C Creativitypl
    dc.subjectLeisurepl
    dc.subjectPsychology of Creativitypl
    dc.subjectContextpl
    dc.subjectInteractionspl
    dc.titleCreativity is Always a Social Processpl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2016 Romina Elisondo, published by University of Białystokpl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Licensepl
    dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2016-0013-
    dc.description.Emailrelisondo@gmail.compl
    dc.description.AffiliationUniversidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Argentinapl
    dc.description.referencesBraceli, R. (1997) Borges-Bioy. Confesiones, confesiones. (Borges-Bioy. Confessions, confessions). Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. (1996) Creatividad. El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención. (Creativity. The Psychology of Discovery and Invention). Barcelona: Paidós.pl
    dc.description.referencesCsikszentmihalyi, M. & Sawyer, K. (2014). Creative Insight: The Social Dimension of a Solitary Moment (pp 73-98). In Csikszentmihalyi (Comp.) The Systems Model of Creativity. Netherlands: Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesChadwick, W. & I. Courtivron (1993). Los otros importantes: creatividad y relaciones íntimas. (Significant Others. Creativity & Intimate Partnership). Madrid: Editorial Catedra.pl
    dc.description.referencesEisler, R., Donnelly, G. & Montuori, A. (2016). Creativity, Society, and Gender: Contextualizing and Redefining Creativity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, 3(2). Retrieved July 14, 2016, from http://pubs.lib.umn.edu/ijps/vol3/iss2.pl
    dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. (2008a). Creatividad en alumnos universitarios. Relaciones entre creatividad y variables académicas, cognitivas y de personalidad. (Creativity in university students. Relations between creativity and academic, cognitive and personality variables). Thesis presented at Murcia University. Unpublished.pl
    dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. (2008b). Creatividad y sus contextos. Estudios en la Universidad. (Creativity and contexts. Studies at the University). Master Thesis presented at Río Cuarto University. Unpublished.pl
    dc.description.referencesElisondo, R., Donolo, D. & Rinaudo, M. (2013). The Unexpected and Education: Curriculums for Creativity. Creative Education, 4(12b). Retrieved June 14, 2016, from http://www.scirp.org/journal/ce/pl
    dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. (2013). Potencialidades creativas en contextos cotidianos. (Creative potential in everyday contexts). In D. Donolo & R. Elisondo (Eds.) Estudio de Creatividad. Las travesías de Alfonsina, de Astor, de Julios y de Marías (Creativity study. Alfonsina, Astor, Julio y Maria´s cruises). (pp. 47-390). Tenerife: Sociedad Latinoamericana de Comunicación Social. Retrieved June 24, 2016, from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/067/cuadernos/10CBA.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. (2015). La creatividad como perspectiva educativa. Cinco ideas para pensar los contextos creativos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. (Creativity as educational perspective. Five ideas to think creative contexts of teaching and learning). Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 15(3), 1-23. Retrieved June 2, 2016, from http://revista.inie.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/aie/article/view/855/913pl
    dc.description.referencesElisondo, R., Donolo, D. & Rinaudo, M. (2012). Docentes inesperados y Creatividad. (Unexpected teachers and Creativity). Revista Electrónica de Investigación Docencia y Creatividad, 1, 103-114.pl
    dc.description.referencesElisondo, R. & Melgar, F. (2016). Las ratas y los estudiantes. El poder de la novedad en la educación. (Rats and students. The power of innovation in education). Congreso Internacional de Ciudades Creativas. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, January 14-16, 2016. Retrieved July 14, 2016, from http://congreso2016.ciudadescreativas.es/Ciudades_Creativas_2016_tomo1.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesGalasso, N. (2004). Discepolo y su época. (Discepolo and his time). Buenos Aires: Corregidor.pl
    dc.description.referencesGarcia, F. (2004). Los ojos. Vida y pasión de Antonio Berni. (The eyes. Life and passion of Antonio Berni). Buenos Aires: Planeta.pl
    dc.description.referencesGardner, H. (1993). Mentes creativas. (Creative minds). Barcelona: Paidos.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79-93.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69-81.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. (2014a). Distributed Creativity. Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Springer Briefs.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. (2014b). The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 1(1), 10-32.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. (2015a). The Status of the Social in Creativity Studies and the Pitfalls of Dichotomic Thinking. Creativity. Theories-Research- Applications, 2(1), 102-119.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2015b). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165-180.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P., & Lubart, T. (2014). Decentring the creative self: How others make creativity possible in creative professional fields. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 29-43.pl
    dc.description.referencesGruber, H. & Walace, D. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. En R. Sternberg, (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. New York.pl
    dc.description.referencesHennessey, B. & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 61, 569-598.pl
    dc.description.referencesHoff, E. (2015). She, You and They - More Actors on the Creativity Research Stage! Creativity. Theories-Research- Applications, 2(1), 38-43.pl
    dc.description.referencesHooker, C., Nakamura, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The Group as Mentor (pp 207-225). In Csikszentmihalyi (Comp.) The Systems Model of Creativity. Netherlands: Springer.pl
    dc.description.referencesJohn-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesKozbelt, A., Begheto, R. & Runco, M. (2010). Theories of Creativity. In J. Kaufman, R. Sternberg (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 447-463). Cambridge: Crambridge Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesLebuda, I. (2015). Big C Research - The Big Challenge? Reflections from Research into Eminent Creativity in the Light of the Investment Theory of Creativity Creativity. Theories-Research- Applications, 2(1), 33-45.pl
    dc.description.referencesLong, H. (2014). An Empirical Review of Research Methodologies and Methods in Creativity Studies (2003-2012). Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 427-438.pl
    dc.description.referencesManes, F. (2014). Usar el cerebro. (Using brain). Buenos Aires: Planeta.pl
    dc.description.referencesMontoya, A. (2007). La vida en danza. (Life in dance). Buenos Aires: Aguilar.pl
    dc.description.referencesMontuori A. & Purser, R. (1995). Deconstructing the Lone Genius Myth: Toward a Contextual View of Creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 35(3), 69-112.pl
    dc.description.referencesPaladini, A. (2007). Leloir. Una mente brillante. (Leloir. A brilliant mind). Buenos Aires: Eudeba.pl
    dc.description.referencesPiazzolla, D., R. Chavero & Fuentes Rey. G (2002). Astor Atahualpa. Los caminos de la identidad. (Astor Atahualpa. The paths of identity). Retrieved July 14, 2016, from http://www.buenosaires.gob.ar/areas/cultura/cpphc/archivos/libros/astor_atahualpa.pdfpl
    dc.description.referencesReiter-Palmon, R. (2014). Can we Really Have an Integrative Theory of Creativity? The Case of Creative Cognition. Creativity. Theories-Research- Applications, 1(2), 256-260.pl
    dc.description.referencesSabato, E. (1998) Antes del fin. (Before the end). Buenos Aires: Planeta.pl
    dc.description.referencesSawyer, K. (2006). Explaining creativity: the science of human innovation. New York: Oxford Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesStake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Londres: Sage.pl
    dc.description.referencesTanggaard, L. (2015). Reaching Out For Everyday Life Creativity. Creativity. Theories Research- Applications, 2(1), 75-78.pl
    dc.description.referencesTherivel, W. (1999). Why Mozart and Not Salieri. Creativity Research Journal, 12(1), 67-76.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume3pl
    dc.description.issue2pl
    dc.description.firstpage194pl
    dc.description.lastpage210pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2016, Vol. 3, Issue 2

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_3_2_2016_R_Elisondo_Creativity_is_Always_a_Social_Process.pdf537,88 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons