REPOZYTORIUM UNIWERSYTETU
W BIAŁYMSTOKU
UwB

  1. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
  2. Czasopisma naukowe / Journals
  3. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications
  4. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 1

Szukanie zaawansowane
  • Zespoły i Kolekcje


  • Zaloguj się
  • Zarejestruj się
  • Mój RUB
  • FAQ
  • Polityka
  • Regulamin
  • DOI
  • Instrukcja
  • Aspekty prawne
  • Open Access
  • Archiwum


  • Kontakt
  • O Dspace
  • Strona Biblioteki
  • Strona Uczelni



    • Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji: http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19842
    Pełny rekord metadanych
    Pole DCWartośćJęzyk
    dc.contributor.authorTan, Ai-Girl-
    dc.date.accessioned2026-03-17T08:17:11Z-
    dc.date.available2026-03-17T08:17:11Z-
    dc.date.issued2015-
    dc.identifier.citationCreativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 85-89pl
    dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11320/19842-
    dc.description.abstractIn this commentary an indispensable aspect of creativity, knowing creativity, is articulated as a response to Glăveanu’s (2014) inquiry into advancement of the field of the psychology of creativity. Connotations of knowing are presented such as perceiving and understanding ourselves within our environment. Accordingly, knowing creativity is about genuinely seeing, sensing, feeling, and relating creativity for self and the common good.pl
    dc.language.isoenpl
    dc.publisherUniversity of Białystokpl
    dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License-
    dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/-
    dc.subjectKnowingpl
    dc.subjectKnowledgepl
    dc.subjectCreativity theorypl
    dc.titleKnowing Creativity. Commentary on Glăveanu, V. (2014). The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Readingpl
    dc.typeArticlepl
    dc.rights.holder© 2015 Ai-Girl Tan, published by University of Białystok.pl
    dc.rights.holderThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.pl
    dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ctra-2015-0013-
    dc.description.Emailaigirl.tan@nie.edu.sgpl
    dc.description.AffiliationNanyang Technological University Singapore, Singaporepl
    dc.description.referencesAmabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377.pl
    dc.description.referencesBergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. New York: Henry Hill and Co.pl
    dc.description.referencesBirgerstam, P. (2002). Intuition – the way to meaningful knowledge. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 4, 431-444.pl
    dc.description.referencesKaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1, 1-12pl
    dc.description.referencesGadamer, H. (2004). Truth and method (2nd Ed, translated by J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marschall). New York: Crossroad.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 1, 69-81; DOI: 10.1037/a0029528.pl
    dc.description.referencesGlăveanu, V. (2014).The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 1, 10-24; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.pl
    dc.description.referencesGurm, B.K. (2013). Multiple ways of knowing in teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7, 1, 1-7.pl
    dc.description.referenceshttp://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v7n1.htmlpl
    dc.description.referencesLawrence, R.L. (2002). Intuitive knowing and embodied consciousness. New Direction for Adult and Continuing Education, 134, 5-66.pl
    dc.description.referencesPolanyi, M. (1968). Logic and psychology. American Psychologist, 23, 1, 27-43; DOI: 10.1037/h0037692.pl
    dc.description.referencesPolanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.pl
    dc.description.referencesPonomarev, Ia. A. (2008). Prospects for the development of the psychology of creativity (I). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 46, 3, 17–93.pl
    dc.description.referencesSchon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.pl
    dc.description.referencesSimonton, D. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl
    dc.description.referencesSundararajan, L., & Raina, M. K. (2014, August 18). Revolutionary creativity, East and West: A critique from indigenous psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037506pl
    dc.description.referencesTan, A.G. (2013). Creativity in cross-disciplinary research. In E. Shiu (Ed.), Creativity research: An interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research handbook (pp. 68-85). London: Routledge.pl
    dc.description.referencesTorrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel/Ginn.pl
    dc.identifier.eissn2354-0036-
    dc.description.volume2pl
    dc.description.issue1pl
    dc.description.firstpage85pl
    dc.description.lastpage89pl
    dc.identifier.citation2Creativity. Theories – Research – Applicationspl
    Występuje w kolekcji(ach):Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 1

    Pliki w tej pozycji:
    Plik Opis RozmiarFormat 
    Creativity_2_1_2015_Ai_Girl_Tan_Knowing_Creativity.pdf201,12 kBAdobe PDFOtwórz
    Pokaż uproszczony widok rekordu Zobacz statystyki


    Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL Creative Commons