W BIAŁYMSTOKU
Proszę używać tego identyfikatora do cytowań lub wstaw link do tej pozycji:
http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19841Pełny rekord metadanych
| Pole DC | Wartość | Język |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tang, Min | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-17T07:57:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-17T07:57:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 79-84 | pl |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/19841 | - |
| dc.description | The author would like to thank Martin Kulessa for his support and valuable comments on the initial version of the paper. | pl |
| dc.description.abstract | In responding to Glăveanu’s critical views on the psychology of creativity, this commentary summarizes seminal work that has been carried out on creativity since 1950s. It underscores the value of the systems approach and discusses key methodological issues related to this approach, including creativity assessment, the necessity for multi-level analyses, the bandwidth-fidelity-dilemma, the challenge of operationalizing creativity for empirical studies and the lack of communication across disciplines. It calls for more external support, cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural collaboration and the establishment of a more open, tolerant and creativity-conducive environment to encourage and unleash creativity in creativity research from creativity researchers. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl |
| dc.publisher | University of Białystok | pl |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | Systems approach | pl |
| dc.subject | Methodology | pl |
| dc.subject | Creativity assessment | pl |
| dc.title | Revisiting the Systems Approach: Commentary on Glăveanu’s Paper “The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading” | pl |
| dc.type | Article | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2015 Min Tang, published by University of Białystok. | pl |
| dc.rights.holder | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. | pl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/ctra-2015-0012 | - |
| dc.description.Email | Min.Tang@fham.de | pl |
| dc.description.Affiliation | University of Applied Management, Germany | pl |
| dc.description.references | Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 5, 997-1013. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Amabile, T., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior 46, 1, 3–15. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. | pl |
| dc.description.references | De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756. | pl |
| dc.description.references | EMCI IP summer school 2013 and 2014: www.emci.fham.de | pl |
| dc.description.references | Friedman R. S., Forster, J., & Denzler, M. (2007). Interactive effects of mood and task framing on creative generation. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 141-162. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Gino, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445-459. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1, 1-12. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Polzer, J., Milton, L. P., & Swann, B. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Moren, S. (2009). Creativity: A systems perspective. In T. Rickards, Runco M. A., & Moger, S. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Creativity (pp. 292-301). UK: Routledge. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 2, 229-240. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Runco, M. A., & Pagnani, A. (2008). Psychological research on creativity. In J. SeftonGreen, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 63-71). London: Routledge. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Scott, G. M., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 36, 361-388. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Simonton, D. K. (1995). Exceptional personal influence. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 371-376. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Simonton, D. K. (2006). Historiometric methods. In A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 319-335). New York: Cambridge University Press. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Tang, M. (2010). China’s young inventors: A systemic view of the individual and environmental factors. Dissertation of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, University of Munich, Germany. Retrievable under http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14898/ | pl |
| dc.description.references | Werner, C., Tang, L. M., Schmidt, J., Mielke, A., Spörrle, M., Neber, H., Zhou, Z., Zhao, X., & Cao, G. (2011). Applied creativity across domains and cultures: Integrating Eastern and Western perspectives. Creative Personality, 9, 228–240. | pl |
| dc.description.references | Westmeyer, H. (1998). The social construction and psychological assessment of creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 1, 11-21. | pl |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2354-0036 | - |
| dc.description.volume | 2 | pl |
| dc.description.issue | 1 | pl |
| dc.description.firstpage | 79 | pl |
| dc.description.lastpage | 84 | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation2 | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications | pl |
| Występuje w kolekcji(ach): | Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 1 | |
Pliki w tej pozycji:
| Plik | Opis | Rozmiar | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creativity_2_1_2015_M_Tang_Revisiting_the_Systems_Approach.pdf | 206,95 kB | Adobe PDF | Otwórz |
Pozycja ta dostępna jest na podstawie licencji Licencja Creative Commons CCL
